Does my Honda FR-V really need new discs at just 62,500 miles?
I took my Honda FR-V diesel in for its 62,500 service and was surprised they told me the rear brake discs need changing. Apparently they're worn out. The pads still have wear so there is no damage to the discs because of worn-out pads. I have never had to change discs on a car before. Is it realistic they've worn out in only 62,500 miles or are they on the make?
Asked on 23 June 2010 by ralph atherton
Answered by
Honest John
They rust through lack of use. 98pc of a car's braking is on the front so surface corrosion does not get cleaned off rear discs as effectively as the fronts.
Similar questions
I own an 18 month old BMW 2 Series Active Tourer which has just had it's first service at 17,100 miles. I'm told that the rear brake pads are worn and need replacing (£275). Having owned many cars, I've...
In May this year I purchased a new Volkswagen Scirocco costing £23,000. My present mileage is 2,000 and my problem is traces of rust appearing on the ‘drums’ between the brake discs of all four alloy wheels....
We are experience a continuing groaning noise when bringing our 2004 KIA Sedona automatic to a stop. We have been back and forth to our local dealership with no joy. We have had the front discs and pads...
Related models
.jpg?width=115&height=75&rmode=crop)
Clever way to carry 6 in 2 rows, like a Multipla, but with Honda quality. 1.8, 2.0 and 2.2 all chain cam engines.
Elsewhere on 
.jpg)
