Is it reasonable for a dealer to replace my RX-8 alternator three weeks after sale?

I've just bought a 2006 Mazda RX-8 with only 32,000 miles from a local independent dealer. The alternator on the car has failed after only owning the car for three weeks, resulting in a recovery by the RAC back to our local mechanic. The selling garage didn't want it recovered to his premises as “he doesn't have any facilities to fix it". The car was sold with a three-month warranty backed by Warranty 2000 and, looking at the details of the cover, it excludes the alternator. Is it reasonable for the selling dealer to be expected to fully recompense me for the alternator replacement (around £300)? As an aside, credit where credit is due, the service received from the RAC was excellent.

Asked on 4 May 2013 by AH, Northallerton

Answered by Honest John
In a word, yes. See: www.honestjohn.co.uk/faq/consumer-rights/ Tell the dealer you know his obligations and he will probably capitulate rather than be taken to court.
Similar questions
I bought my Peugeot 307 HDI 2-litre diesel just over a year ago and have had nothing but problems with it since I got it. The dealer turned out to be unreliable but as my car is financed he gets away with...
I jhd a new alternator fitted 18 months ago (20K miles) on my Mercedes 220 CDI and the bearings are now shot so it has to be replaced. How long is a fair life of an alternator?
The alternator on my 2017 Honda Civic has gone after only 33,000 miles, which suggests the parts was not fit for purpose or faulty. The dealer has contacted Honda but they are offering no assistance. The...
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer