A Labour MP has spoken in the Commons about misleading parking charges.
Nick Smith, Labour MP for Blaenau Gwent, made a speech in the House of Commons on 28th September 2012 asking that leave be given to bring in a Bill to make provisions relating to signage and ticketing technology for parking charges used in publicly-available car parks. He stated that “Misleading and confusing signs are inexcusable; it should be simple to get the signs and pay machines right.”
He went on to say, “I am also worried about a developing business model for this sector, in which the landowner receives the hourly charge from the motorist but the car park operator receives the income from any extra charges. So, from the car park operator’s point of view, the more confusing the signage is, the better. When it is confusing for the motorist, the car park operators make more money. That cannot be right. This Bill will end the open season on motorists; it will deliver clear, easy-to-read signs in all car parks used by the public. Payment systems, too, must be as simple as possible. Motorists who pay should not face extra charges when they have done the right thing… When I met the Transport Minister, I was told that an independent appeals service for unfair ticketing would be introduced under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. That safeguard is welcome, but it fails to address the large-scale and deliberately exploitative ticketing operations of some in the sector.”
Nick Smith accordingly presented the Bill. Bill read the first time; to be read a second time on Friday 25 January 2013, and to be printed.
He went on to say, “I am also worried about a developing business model for this sector, in which the landowner receives the hourly charge from the motorist but the car park operator receives the income from any extra charges. So, from the car park operator’s point of view, the more confusing the signage is, the better. When it is confusing for the motorist, the car park operators make more money. That cannot be right. This Bill will end the open season on motorists; it will deliver clear, easy-to-read signs in all car parks used by the public. Payment systems, too, must be as simple as possible. Motorists who pay should not face extra charges when they have done the right thing… When I met the Transport Minister, I was told that an independent appeals service for unfair ticketing would be introduced under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. That safeguard is welcome, but it fails to address the large-scale and deliberately exploitative ticketing operations of some in the sector.”
Nick Smith accordingly presented the Bill. Bill read the first time; to be read a second time on Friday 25 January 2013, and to be printed.
Asked on 11 October 2012 by NM, via email
Answered by
Honest John
At last. A good MP who has properly understood the situation and acted honestly. Every Telegraph reader should support this Bill and end the exploitation of motorists for minor breaches of parking contracts, which is set to cost all of us more than £125,000,000 over the next year. And much of that £125,000,000 goes into the pockets of the former clamping gangs, now banned, actually doubling the income they have lost from no longer being allowed to clamp. What kind of country bans a heinous form of exploitation, then compensates the perpetrators with a fresh licence to exploit?
Similar questions
I am severely disabled with arthritis and incontinence and have undergone an upsetting and lengthy ordeal with Excel Parking Services Limited. I realise the saga is too long to publish, but at least you...
I received a parking ticket from a private operator when parking at my local college. I thought it was a student prank and threw it away. A few weeks later I got a demand for £80 as I had not paid the...
A letter published in your column this week reminded me of an experience at Oxford station a few years ago. I bought a ticket for my day's parking and because I had parked right up to the perimeter fence...
Elsewhere on 
.jpg)
