Why does coasting downhill use more fuel than staying in gear?
The leaflets sent out with tax disc renewal notices headed “Be a smarter driver and save money” give the advice “Stay in Gear. Don't coast downhill or towards lights in neutral as this uses more fuel.” While I appreciate that it is safer to keep a car in gear, I don't understand how or why coasting should use more fuel than being in gear. Can you explain?
Asked on 15 September 2012 by TC, Canterbury
Answered by
Honest John
Coasting in neutral uses a tiny amount of fuel to keep the engine idling. If you lift off in gear, the fuel supply is shut off entirely, the wheels turn the engine via the drivetrain and the engine uses no fuel at all.
Tags:
fuel economy
Similar questions
We have a 2014 Land Rover Freelander (15,000 miles) and a 2013 Kia Rio (22,000) on 17-inch rims (big mistake for country roads). We have a budget of about £20,000 and would like to change the Kia Rio for...
I have an MG HS and since I purchased I have had a issue with the miles in tank reporting incorrectly. e.g. I can do a motorway journey with the car showing 300 miles in the tank travel 195.5 miles and...
A couple of months ago my Honda Jazz was doing just over 70 mpg. Then suddenly it went down to 52mpg. I asked at my local garage and they showed me how to have AC turned off. It’s improved a little but...

