Is this a warranty repair?

My automatic transmission needs a complete reconditioning. The gear box was dismantled at a specialist transmission place and they reported that the fluid was black, burnt, smelly & low.

A full exam showed the direct clutch had failed due to loss of hydraulic pressue through the direct clutch teflon sealing rings. The warranty company sent their own inspectors to write a report and this says there was no mechanical failure and it was expected wear & tear on a vehicle of this age - enabling the warranty company to get out of paying for any repairs.

But this second report did say they were unable to examine the fluid as it had already been drained. Did the fact that the fluid was black & smelly and at a low level make any difference?

Did this cause the subsequent damage to the transmission? Or would general wear and tear on the transmission cause the fluid to degenerate? How long does it take for fluid to get like this and damage the transmission?

Asked on 27 February 2013 by JBrown

Answered by Honest John
I don't think this is a warranty repair. I think the problem is caused by poor maintenance and consequential wear.
Similar questions
Having checked your site when I bought an A5 with a major oil problem (the independent dealer has subsequently gone bust) I went to my main dealer (Sheffield Audi) who was great and agreed with Audi to...
I read about the long warranties on Hyundais and KIAs. Do you need to take your car to the dealers to keep the 5 and 7-year warranties? I also read about Volkswagen Polo 1.4s having premature bore or piston...
The p/ex value of my Freelander 2 via a dealer makes the economics of selling unappealing, given its low utility of 27,800 miles. Following a substantial bill to repair the rear differential last week...