Government interference

Technically, with ‘Intelligent Speed Adaptation’ by GPS, speeding can be prevented. There is no need to cover the country with expensive "speed sensitive stop lights". The object is not to punish anybody, but to prevent the problem in the first place. Your "lights" are an after the event solution, too late, and likely to delay any drivers following the offending vehicle.

Asked on 8 August 2009 by

Answered by Honest John

Unfortunately Intelligent Speed Adaptation has been proved not to work and could be a killer. A public-spirited guinea pig involved in the testing turned mole and e-mailed me. If, for instance, ISA curbs the speed of a car where its speed is getting it out of trouble, then ISA could cause a multiple fatality. Then, whoever installed the Intelligent Speed Adaptation would have to be held responsible in law. It’s also much more expensive than speed sensitive traffic lights and could only be fitted to a small percentage of the 30,000,000 vehicles on UK roads anyway. I suspect that the promotion of ISA is due to strong lobbying by the manufacturers who stand to make millions out it.

Tags: speeding intelligent speed adaptation gps driving

Similar questions

Central Intelligent Agency?

I was interested in a recent letter about Intelligent Speed Adaptation for cars. I live in the New Forest and our local paper is full of ideas to prevent animal accidents, speeding, etc. One wished to...

Intelligence pest

I have been reading with interest and shock that Transport for London is looking at the idea of Speed curbing - also known as intelligent speed adaptation (ISA). Bar the obvious reduction in speed camera...

The Fact Controller

Intelligent Speed Adaptation. Let me tell you my experience a with cruise control which was switched off. Went into a parking place when the engine suddenly raced at full throttle and I was nearly sent...