Car by car break-down

It seems that car manufacturers in Europe have been keen to create their own individual Monopoly Areas and have colluded by drivers means to restrict repair, maintenance and supply of parts to their own individual channels. The object being to force Joe Public to purchase new cars from and to take his/her car only to franchise dealers for repair etc. As the car makers have forced franchise dealers to invest in very grand premises at the dealers cost, that has to be paid for and emerges in the hourly rates, parts costs etc that Joe Public has to pay. Relief from much of this was achieved in the UK but I understand that some of it may be re-introduced in 2010 if carmakers have their way. (Fronted of course by their lobbying of our dear friends in Brussels). The carmakers are not strangers to the art of obfuscation either. Forget any idea you may have had of trying to set up in business maintaining/repairing cars unless you have lots of money saved. Why? Because the car makers have set about making their cars so complicated that a huge investment in electronic and diagnostic gadgetry is required plus the cost of annual up-grades and of course, the magic boxes to house it all. This puts the small independent garage at an enormous financial disadvantage and I suppose they will all quietly expire as a result. This brings us in sight of the end-game: MONOPOLY. Monopoly means high prices, expedited scrapping of older cars because of the cost to maintain and a premature visit to the car sales department. What say you?

Asked on 7 March 2009 by

Answered by Honest John
You are right that safety and emissions regulation have made cars so electronically complex that they cannot be maintained by general small garages; only independent specialist who can afford to invest in the diagnostic kit for a particular marque. You are also correct that EC lobbying is behind this, but, of course, because the EC is a bureaucracy, not a democracy, all the lobbyists have to do is slip a bung to some senior bureaucrat and he makes sure that what is wanted becomes EC law. There is a 'right to repair' campaign against this (www.r2rc.co.uk). The other side of the argument is that car manufacturers are currently losing money hand over fist. And they employ a lot of people. So restricting the 'life' of new cars to around 7 years or so by making them excessively complex, ensures a replacement cycle that keeps the carmakers in business.
Similar questions
Is it me or have recent emissions laws resulted in the motorist being lined up for a nasty surprise? I refer to the EGR valve setup on many Euro IV engines. This allows spent gases to be recycled back...
My question arises out of the discrepancy revealed by all road tests I have seen between official fuel consumption figures of hybrid cars and those found by road testers. These appear to be far larger...
Last September, in the interest of economy and the environment, I traded in a Mercedes for a new Toyota Prius Hybrid. The chief attraction of the Prius lay in its claim that the fuel efficiency was an...
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer