Breathing more easily

Is it me or have recent emissions laws resulted in the motorist being lined up for a nasty surprise? I refer to the EGR valve setup on many Euro IV engines. This allows spent gases to be recycled back through the engine to lower final emissions. In itself perhaps a good idea but it seems many engines also vent the crankcase to the same inlet manifold and the combination of soot from the recycled gases and small amounts of oil from the breather mean that over time the inlet manifold, intercooler and turbo get nicely gummed up, particularly on a turbo diesel engine. Why don't manufacturers at least fit an oil catch tank to prevent oil from the breather entering the inlet manifold and thereby stop the creation of the sludge in the first place? Would you recommend this as sensible thing to fit as an owner who can see the problem is likely to develop over time and wants to take action now rather than wait for the inevitable and no doubt expensive alternative?

Asked on 20 June 2009 by

Answered by Honest John
I don't have technical knowledge. I was a trader, not a mechanic. But EGR valves have been doing this for 20 years. Even worse, some types of Diesel Particulate Filter have been re-introducing uncombusted fuel to the sump oil, resulting in contaminated sump oil and in some cases to the level getting so high the engine starts to run on the sump oil and can't be stopped. Petrol engines are now a more sensible solution than over complex diesels, especially for anyone running a vehicle in towns.
Similar questions
My question arises out of the discrepancy revealed by all road tests I have seen between official fuel consumption figures of hybrid cars and those found by road testers. These appear to be far larger...
Last September, in the interest of economy and the environment, I traded in a Mercedes for a new Toyota Prius Hybrid. The chief attraction of the Prius lay in its claim that the fuel efficiency was an...
I have a 2010 Volkswagen Golf Plus 1.6 turbodiesel which had its emissions 'fix' done at 43,000 miles. Is it better to get rid of it or should I just wait and see if the DPF lasts for a couple more years?