What is life like with your car? Let us know and win £500 in John Lewis vouchers | No thanks

Transmission transition

Last October we replaced our 10-year-old Nissan Micra 1.3 automatic under the scrappage scheme, buying the new equivalent Micra 1.4 automatic. Comparing the brochures and specifications for the two cars, I noted that the official tests showed improved fuel consumption figures for the new car. However, the new car is using considerably more fuel than the old one. Can you suggest any reason why? I am not aware that I drive the new car any differently to the old one. It has a 4-speed auto gearbox, which in my view is vastly inferior to the old CVT and the car is fitted with 16 inch 185/50 tyres. Considering its performance (sufficient for my needs but modest by modern standards) its stated CO2 emissions seem high. The old car returned 47mpg overall whilst I am lucky to get more than 41mpg from the new one. There was a very marginal improvement in fuel economy as the engine of the first car loosened up but this was a tiny fraction of the difference in fuel consumption I’m seeing. The new car runs nicely and I’m not aware of any problem with the engine but I wonder why it’s using so much fuel. I’m not trying to compare the fuel consumption I achieve with the theoretical figures in the brochure, just the difference between the two cars.

Asked on 21 August 2010 by IB, Reading

Answered by Honest John
The old K11 Micra had a CVT auto. The current K12 Micra has a torque converter auto that is less fuel-efficient. The next K13 Micra will revert to CVT. See video at: www.honestjohn.co.uk/road-tests/nissan/nissan-micr...3 The 185/50 tyres won't help, unless they are Michelin Pilot Primacy HP. But 41mpg isn't actually bad for a 1.4 automatic.
Similar questions
I own a Ford Focus 1.6 Automatic Reg 2009 on mobility. I have done approximately 2,000 miles but get only 33.3 mpg. This feels low to me. Dealer said that it would improve over time. I don't feel this...
If an 11 year old car, worth say £200 or so, was damaged in an accident and would naturally be 'written off', would insurers pay out the £200 or £2,000 that the car would be ‘worth’ under the scrappage...
My car was stolen. Before the insurance paid me, the police found it, did forensic tests and then notified me it is ready for collection. By phone the police told me there was no visible damage. However...