Berlingo Multispace vs Grand Picasso - Rochdale Pioneers

We want to buy an MPV and have whittled the choice down to these two. Criteria was that it must have 3 full size seats in the 2nd row, have a big boot but not be a mahoosive bus. And so we're kind of torn.

I love the sliding doors, the small footprint and the cheap insurance on the Berlingo. Van looks aren't an issue, but the everything is an extra spec is - I want the full complement of airbags please.

Or the Grand Picasso which ticks every box on the spec and functionality list but has that loooong nose in front making it a big car.

I'm coming from a company car onto an allowance so budget ian't an issue, could buy new for the right deal and there are a few out there. I know that there are quite a few Berlingo owners on here so wondered if there any any things we should watch for, problems with the 1.6HDi engine etc. And I read very mixed reviews of the EGC box - quite fancy an auto especially as it's as efficient as the manual, but know its a marmite choice. And we could consider petrol as mileage likely to be 10k a year - is their 1.6 petrol worth a look?

Having spent 12 years in vompany

Berlingo Multispace vs Grand Picasso - Rochdale Pioneers

Err, can't seem to edit on my phone! Was saying that after years on a company car its liberating to get to choose what I want, but so much choice....

Berlingo Multispace vs Grand Picasso - gordonbennet

Under the skin they are basically the same vehicle, sensibly the Berlingo has a proper handbrake instead of the failure waiting to happen that is the electric jobbie standard on C4 Pic, old Berlingo sported rear drums but the current shape gained rear discs, proper spare tyre too.

No auto option on Berlingo, terrible oversight IMO, but otherwise i'm a big Berlingo fan, if they had offered the proper auto box in them, as found in the incredibly rare petrol only C4 Pic Lounge hatch then i would have had one long ago, though in manual form i think they are a good drive, supremely comfortable over Britains cratered and pot holed roads.

What i always noticed when driving all Berlingo's is that whichever engine is fitted, petrol or Diesel, always seem able to lug right down to stall speed without a murmer, almost impossibe to stall, much more tractable than with the same engine fitted to cars, maybe the vans were set up differently to account for their likely workload, makes them a pleasant drive IMO.

The automated manual box on C4 Pic is about standard for the gearbox type from most makers, ok on the open road where few changes are needed, sluggish and jolts (don't know how they manage that) when driven briskly, doesn't have a clue what gear it wants at junctions and absolutely useless for close manoeuvering, the same as all the other automated manuals then...i am biased i spent years delivering them, and getting these things onto the transporter didn't endear them to me...but don't let my one tiny criticism sway you..;)

EDIT...its been 3 years since i packed the cars deliveries in, so its possible i suppose that Berly could by now have an auto option, if thats the case i apologise for the wrong info...still couldn't pay me to have one though...:-)

Another edit...from HJ car reviews above....'

17-7-2011: Now apparently available with 1.6 HDI 90 and 6-speed EGS automated manual box.

Edited by gordonbennet on 05/09/2012 at 22:21

Berlingo Multispace vs Grand Picasso - SteveLee

The Grand Picasso has a lot more electronic trickery to go wrong - I'd go for the Berlingo if I were fixing it with my own cash. As a company car - I guess this doesn't matter.

Berlingo Multispace vs Grand Picasso - daveyjp
A friend has a Berlingo van for his business. His old one did 130,000 over 5 years and never missed a beat so he has bought the updated one.

An area where Citroen could have had a USP was to fit the van bench seat in the car version.

Also consider the Nemo Multispace if you need a little more room.
Berlingo Multispace vs Grand Picasso - Ald

I have just traded in a Xsara Picasso after over three years ownership. I loved it, it was no bother at all and averaged around 50 mpg, aircon on all the time and lots of town work. We needed a meatier car to tow the caravan so I looked at Berlingo's would have had one in a shot if they put a bigger engine in! Love the space and the neutrality of the car from the ownership perspective, I guess people don't think you are a knob owning one. I didn't consider the new Picasso, looks too complicated, sometimes basic is better.

Berlingo Multispace vs Grand Picasso - Rochdale Pioneers

A bit of an update. I think we're headimg towards Picasso territory on a number of grounds. I think we'd like some warranty so we're looking at no more than 18 months old, or new if the broker prices can be believed. Dealers doing no VAT and 0% for 3 years which undercuts some of the nearly new on the market. Berlingo bought new makes less sense, but I think finding one with the full complement of both airbags and family friendly trim at the kind of age we want is hard. Peugeot do a Partner Tepee Family trim which ticks all the boxes, but none out there used and new theyre almost as expensive as a Grand Picasso.

A couple of questions which probably apply to more Citroens than just the one I'm interested in. We'll do 10kish a year, is the 1.6 petrol decent/reliable or do we need diesel for reliability/useability? Diesel is +£1,500 if we buy new. And secondly there are quite a few cars out there with the EGS box - if we get a 2011 on car with the software mods I read about is it a good box? BTW to answer a point made earlier I'm coming off a company car scheme, new firm pays an allowance which will pay for some of the cost of whatever we get.

Berlingo Multispace vs Grand Picasso - Rochdale Pioneers

Okay another option - one of our local dealers has a glut of Grand Picasso's, all about 3 years old and on for £8,500 or so with 40k miles. Is the extra £5k or so worth it to get a car a couple of years younger....?

Berlingo Multispace vs Grand Picasso - BigJohnD

My view is that it's the C3 Picasso which is the nearest to the Berlingo. The C3 Pic's styling is not to everyone's taste, but it's extremely practical and based on proven designs.

The Berlingo has a great track record, largely becuase it's pretty basic. The C4 Pics are expensive if the EGS transmission decides to play up (they're generally not as bad as the press would have you believe though personally I'd go for the manual) and the pneumatic suspension on Exclusives can be troublesome though it seems to be OK on the latest models. Otherwise it's driectly comparable with a Ford Galaxy.

However, have no fears about the 1.6HDi (DV6) engine, it's powerful, econmical, reliable and unburstable - provided the correct grade of oil is used and it's changed every 20K km / 12.5K miles and no later. It's found in all PSA cars and vans, Mazdas, Minis, Fiats and Fords.

It's hard to calculate the £££ break even point of diesel v petrol, as there's several factors to consider, but it's probably nearer 15K miles/year than 10K.

Berlingo Multispace vs Grand Picasso - Rochdale Pioneers

Quick update. After a bit of searching around and a few test drives I've bought an 09 Grand Picasso VTR Plus 1.6 HDI with the EGS box - ex Motability car with 17k on the clock and 2 services under its belt. According to What Car I've paid £700 below dealer price and the car looked in great condition (as you'd hope for one with low mileage on it). My dad's had Motability cars for years so I know that they're pretty rigorous with maintenance and checks before they're handed back, so hopefully it'll do the job. Will know more when I pick it up tomorrow....