Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - Luv_Herbie
2005 54 Reg RENAULT Scenic 1.5 Dci Dynamique v 2006 06 Kia Carens 2.0 CRDi LE

Any help on this one would be greatly received!

I am a mum of 2 (one two year old and a new born) and I need to purchase a car. I have a budget of £5000 and so far have only found two cars that seem to fit the criteria of being able to fit 2 car seats in the back with space between them and also have a large enough boot to haul around all the bits I need - mainly the double buggy, that fall within my price range - although today I was offered a Zafira with only 30,000 on the clock for £5,000 (1.6 petrol on 54 plate)

The Renault has 60,000 on the clock and is £3000 and the Kia has 41,000 on the clock and is £5,300. I have trawled the internet looking at reviews of both cars and both seem to be equally matched in terms of their problems etc! Which one is the better buy?

HELP!

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - WellKnownSid

What sort of mileage are you planning on doing? Are you buying privately or through a dealer (i.e. with a warranty)?

The Renault and Kia options you've given are diesels - and given your budget could easily wipe you out if they turn out to be problem cars. Unless you're covering high a mileage, I would consider petrols like the Zafira you've quoted.

I can't help on UK prices or reliability of the models quoted, other than to point out that a friend of ours in the UK has a 2005 Scenic and is facing a £1,500 repair bill for engine troubles at the moment.

On another note, I think you'll actually find that most cars will happily take 2 car seats + 1 in the back - and it's the boot space which is probably the killer. This is because some buggies don't fold, or are the wrong shape when they do.

How about looking at different buggies as an alternative - might open up your choice of car a bit Finding the right size/shape buggy for our eldest before she was born meant that the wife could keep and enjoy her two-seater car for two more years, despite its tiny boot. Mothercare 'own-brand' range to the rescue...

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - primeradriver
If you don't mind the Kia then the 1.6 petrol would be my choice. This engine is a simple, well-proven old-school Hyundai lump which is itself based on the Mitsubishi Orion engine which is one of the most proven lumps available anywhere.

The petrols are also dirt-cheap -- a 2004-5 would be around the £2500 mark.
Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - Avant

You might get a trouble-free Scenic but it's more of a gamble. French cars aren't rubbish (a Citroen Picasso is worth putting on your list as well), but they're more vulnerable to abuse / unsympathetic driving. Japanese and, I believe, Korean cars are better able to cope with it because more money has been put into making durable components.

Are you sure a Toyota Verso won't fit your family? Worth a serious look if it could.

Unless you do a very high annual mileage, I agree with those above who say go for a petrol (too many horror stories on here of major failure with older diesels). Also buying from a dealer is more expensive but you get more protection from the Sale of Goods Act and you may also get, or be able to buy or extend, a warranty.

Edited by Avant on 16/04/2010 at 23:02

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - Luv_Herbie
Unlikely to do much more than 6K miles a year -

Will definately take a look at the Verso -
I looked at the Matrix - but there is just no boot to it!

I have the smallest double buggy that is available on the market - so not sure that I can do much more in that area.

I have looked at the Picasso - but I'm a bit on the short side and could not see much past the dash board!

Thanks for all the advice so far!
Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - Ben79

If doing under 6k, then it's probably not worth buying a diesel.

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - WellKnownSid
Unlikely to do much more than 6K miles a year

DEFINATELY avoid all diesels. They will be FAR more trouble than they are worth at that mileage...

I have looked at the Picasso - but I'm a bit on the short side and could not see much past the dash board!

That surprises me - the wife is tiny, but had no problem driving a Picasso around for four years.

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - davmal

Just had a weeked away, 500 mile round trip and the motorway hard shoulder was littered with broken down diesel cars, they're just so unreliable, no wonder they're so unpopular.

Terrific piece of advice, based on what?

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - WellKnownSid

Actually, the issue isn't reliability, it's about risk.

Common Rail diesel engines bring with them a high cost of repair, regardless of failure rate ('reliability') - which notably also can INCREASE with lower usage.

6,000 miles a year - at say 25mpg is 240 gallons of petrol.  If the equivalent diesel did 35mpg, that's around 69 gallons a year saving.  Less than £400?

One EGR gummed up through lack of usage would soon eat into that budget - let's hope the DPF (if fitted) doesn't clog!

I'm not against diesels, Common Rail, or high mileage - my car has almost 300,000km on the clock, but I do >40,000km a year.

To me, a £1,500 turbo failure would be nothing more than 'routine maintenance' - because it's amortised over the high mileage I do.  Given the budget, I very much doubt the OP with a limited budget would welcome a £1,500 repair bill!

It's a risk which can be mitigated by choosing a petrol.

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - primeradriver

Agree totally about the risk.

Manufacturers seem to have forgotten about the requirement for a simple car that doesn't cost an arm and a leg to fix. Nowhere is this need more important than for a private, family owner who doesn't do too many miles and needs to watch the budget.

As far as I am concerned cars for this market should have basic, proven mechanicals, the minimum of complex electronics and modern diesels just don't match up to this requirement IMO.

Looking at something like a Mitsubishi Space Star you see more of the kind of vehicle I'd be looking at. An engine that dates back to 1978 and is proven to be solid, electrics that are kept to a minimum and look more like something from the early 1990s and solid build where it matters (although they could have made more of an effort inside). Cheap as well, and shedloads of space in the engine bay so dead easy to work on.

For a motorway hack, the needs are totally different. Refinement and mpg are the order of the day. 150K in five years then sc***. That's what these cars are designed for pretty much, and if they manage more than that then it's a bonus.

Put the engine from the latter into the body of the former and you have completely unnecessary risk.

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - WellKnownSid

150K in five years then sc***. 

My friend in the UK facing the £1,500 bill has been told exactly that.  Turbo failed, engine has drunk its own oil (screeching turbo, blue smoke everywhere), and even if the turbo (and several other parts) are replaced then no guarantee it will run again.

Less than five years old, just over 60,000 miles on the clock - new engine will cost more than the car, therefore sc***.

She's had the car since just before Christmas (private buy!), barely used it with all the snow, and effectively has to write it off.  This isn't the only time it's been into the garage either - presumably the PO got rid for a reason!

Instead of buying a high mileage, five year old diesel family car, she should have leased a new E class Mercedes for 12 months for about the same money.  Madness!

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - b308

One of the original Skoda Roomsters will do you, should get a petrol at £5k, its got a bigger boot than most larger estates. Also have you considered the estate versions of the superminis? Skoda Fabia estates are very common, also 206/7s, though not as good as the skoda for space.

People tend to think that for internal space they need something large, but in reality some of the sameller cars such as those mentioned (and possibly the Meriva, though the boot is smaller) can be just as big inside, I know that my Roomie is bigger inside than most much larger 4x4s for instance! There's also the Astra/Focus sized estates which should be big enough...

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - ifekas

I can agree with the suggestion of the Roomster, but I'm a bit biased as I have one and love it. You may find the movable rear seats useful in your situation.

I don't think the petrol engined ones are particularly economical but for the mileage you do it won't make much of a difference.

Even if you go for a diesel Roomster, it should be reliable as the engines used are the older 1.4 and 1.9TDi's which are good though not the most refined. They won't have a particulate filter (unless the new ones do). The 1.4TDi models don't even have a dual mass flywheel. Having said that, my previous car had a 1.9TDi engine and although I held onto it for nine years, I never had any problems with the dual mass flywheel.

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - b308

, but I'm a bit biased as I have one and love it.

They won't have a particulate filter (unless the new ones do). The 1.4TDi models don't even have a dual mass flywheel. Having said that, my previous car had a 1.9TDi engine and although I held onto it for nine years, I never had any problems with the dual mass flywheel.

And me, ifekas... I think that its a very overlooked car simply because of its looks... it outdoes most cars two sizes up in useful space and gives many MPVs such as the Zafera a run for their money... just look beyond the looks!

None of the PD engined Roomies had a DPF, only the new 1.6 CR one does and thats only just been launched... so no probs there... and I've not had any DMF issues either in over 100k PD miles...

I had to laugh with the comments earlier, I've just driven back from France (nearly 600 miles) and the only cars I saw broken down were petrol ones... when will people realise that modern petrol engines are just as complicated as diesels these days... I agree that they are cheaper to fix (in most cases), but overall most modern cars can go on forever if looked after correctly... and thats the key, most breakdowns are caused by neglect rather than engine failure... if diesels were as unreliable as the petrolheads would have it they wouldn't be able to sell any... the numbers around speaks for itself.

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - DP

We bought a 2 yr old Grand Scenic 1.9 dCi Dynamique on a 54 plate when we were in similar circumstances to yourself. You will not find a better family car at anything like the money. Practical, good looking (in my opinion), loads of space, comfortable, smooth, quiet, lots of toys to play with etc etc.

But they are not built to last, and on ours, 60,000 miles was where it all started going wrong. They are unbelievably (unneccesarily) complex cars both mechanically and electronically, and when things do go wrong, the bills are eye watering. You will also find that many mechanics simply don't want to work on them.

After a list of niggly (but live-with-able??) problems, ours sprung a clutch slave cylinder failure on us which dumped us at the side of a busy dual carriageway, and cost us a grand to fix. On top of that it was starting to have problems with its power steering and dash panel, which would have come to another £1500 or so to sort. We outed it while it was still worth something.

It would be a fantastic car to own new and under warranty, but trust me this is not a car you want to own as it gets older, and without warranty cover.

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - Avant

I'm intrigued that some people are so sharp-eyed that they can tell, while driving along a motorway, what sort of engine is powering (or failing to) the car broekn doewn on the hard shoulder.

My Octavia has no badge on it saying whether it's a diesel (it is) and you'd have to take our eyes off the road to spot the badge on most cars. VW and Audi are probably the most conspicuous with TDI.

Generally the less stressed an engine is, and the fewer electronic complications it has, the longer it will last. Long may - for example - VAG con tinue to build cars with the old 1.9 PD engine - but they'll do so only if new buyers choose it. I'm as guilty as anyone in choosing a 2.0 CR TDI because it offers better performance and less noise.

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - Mr Fox

We have a Renault Grand Scenic 1.6, 2005. It was chosen exactly for the reasons given above, to avoid complications with diesel engines. So far it has been completely trouble free and we even found a local private specialist to take care of servicing etc.

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - barney100

Have you cosidered a small estate? something like an Astra or Focus or maybe Skoda. At your mileage a petrol would be better suited and personally I would avoid the Scenic as I know one or two folks with largiish bills recently..

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - jords

you could consider a honda stream they are 7 seater. Not a massive boot but we get a phil and teds two seater buggy in no problem .Our one has done 100k, last 30k with us and hasnt required anything apart from routine oil and filters .The ride is a bit firm but overall its been a good buy

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - bazza1603

Try doing a hillstart in the Carens with that stupid park brake.

We opted for a petrol Zafira after looking at the Carens. Its a nice car and great for kids to see out of the windows.. However fuel economy its bad, and for that reason I regret buying a van!

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - kerbed enthusiasm

It all depends what you want the car to do and, of course, how much you're prepared to pay. The two cars you mention have quite a price difference.

I currently run a Mazda Premacy and couldn't recommend it highly enough. The model ceased production on a 54 plate though and has been replaced by the Mazda 5 which is a much larger car with a less than pleasing seating arrangement. The Premacy has been utterly reliable over the past five years and, other than routine servicing (and replacing the front discs) nothing has been spent on it although I must admit to having had to replace a number plate bulb the other week. It's a direct injection diesel so it's rough but bomb proof, especially in comparison to common rail (which I've also owned). The downside is that its NCAP rating is lower than newer cars. That said, the passive safety features of good handling and excellent visibility make it feel much safer than the Meriva that we also own.

If I were to buy a similar car again I'd definitely look at the Roomster - lower centre or gravity than most MPVs, good quality interior, proven mechanicals and rave reviews...

Renault Scenic v Kia Carens - Which one is the better buy - MarkSh

I have had a 2006 (56) Kia Carens for just over a year, it is worth considering the latest model, post November 2006 as you will have the remainder of the manufacturers 5 year warranty (extended to 7 years for 2010 registered vehicles). I have found that Kia service from my local dealer is second to none. I have had 3 problems, a broken catch on the central storage box (replaced under warranty), screen washers stopped working (filter cleaned and replaced under warranty even though it was now over 3 years old, how many other manufacturers would regard this as a warranty job and not a service item) and recently a faulty EGR valve (again replaced under warranty along with a diesel particulate and throttle response upgrade carried out). I do around 12,000 miles p.a. and tow a caravan and the automatic Carens is a real dream to drive, the foot operated parking brake is not an issue with the auto box. It is also very economical for a large vehicle and is very well equipped (I have the LS version). If you can afford it a carens with some warranty remaining could be a star buy.