>>> That would be because the Kia Pride was a turkey. <<<
Not a bad little mota was the Pride, one of the 1st imports from Kia into the UK and an ideal little runabout IMO.
|
>>The missus would like to know the reason for putting all that stuffing in there.
It is there to provide acoustic absorption or damping.
Silencers will work reasonably well without any absorption material in there, becasue there are two sudden changes in section. When an acoustic wave meets a change in section, this represents a change in acoustic impedance, and, some of the wave is reflected back up the pipe. The silencer effectively acts as a trap with the wave bouncing back up and down its length, and only a small portion getting out of the end of the pipe.
While the impedance mismatch effect above makes the waves bounce around, there isn't any mechanism there to actually dissipate any of the wave's acoustic energy. By interacting with the acoustic waves, the absorption material will act to turn the acoustic energy into heat energy, and thus further reduce the sound pressure.
>>I'd still appreciate anyone telling me how the second choke on the carb is operated.
I don't know much about these cars, but, if it's not a straight forward linkage, then, it's most likely vacuum operated from the first venturi.
Edited by Number_Cruncher on 06/10/2009 at 13:18
|
>> I don't know much about these cars but if it's not a straight forward linkage then it's most likely vacuum operated from the first venturi.
I had one like that on a Volvo. Movement of the first throttle spindle past a certain point permitted the spring-operated second to move, but it didn't do so until actually activated by a vacuum device.
You could test it by moving the first manually (engine off), then sucking on a pipe to simulate the vacuum. If nothing happened then either the diaphram was punctured or the mechanism was stuck. This could easily happen if you hardly ever pressed the pedal down far enough to keep it free.
|
|
|
|
Odd little car...... like Ladas and Skoda Estelles, they tend to have a loyal band of devotees who defend them to the hilt despite their acknowledged failings.
My experience of them is via Mrs. H who had one when we first met. Have to admit it pulled well and the headlights were good, but reliability wasn't its strong point. Can't say I was overly impressed with it myself, the Punto which replaced it was a much nicer drive.
Herself's Pride was one of the last batch, on a "V" plate. I understand that these weren't quite as good as the earlier ones, any other owners present and previous know why?
Oddly enough, despite Tom's comments above ours failed MOT due to extensive rust; possibly because of its location, spent much of its life in Aberwristwatch where there is a thriving colony of Kia Prides, think the local dealer bought a job lot!
Edited by Harleyman on 06/10/2009 at 14:41
|
|
|
|