There have been a few discussions on here regarding SUV type estate cars or hatchbacks, suggesting that they handle and ride like Golfs etc. I cannot see how this can be possible bearing in mind that most are a good deal heavier than an equivalent car with a ground clearance of 8 or 9 inches moving the C of G up accordingly. I understand that they can be relatively comfy, but handling and ride on par with a Golf?
Perhaps somebody who understands vehicle dynamics could explain for me.
|
>>understands vehicle dynamics could explain for me.
The way that you have put your question and the choice of words you have made suggest that you already know at least a little about the subject.
|
|
I am informed that Porsche Cayenne and BMW X5 handles very well and much better than the Golf too
|
I suspect a wide track, and flashy computerised suspension help offset the CofG issues.
|
All other things being equal, the OP is correct.
But all other things aren't equal....
|
|
|
|
|
I have driven lots of SUVs (including M Class, X5) and have yet to experience one that handles as well as a normal car. To be perfectly honest, the X5 and M Class don't even ride as comfortably as the equivalent 5 Series and E Class. Mostly to do with centre of gravity.
|
|
plus anything genuinely intended for any off road use (I know that rules out most of the SUVs) will have significant suspension travel whihc I guess equates to more body roll.
|
|
|
|
|
Where exactly Ago? I hadn't noticed that comparison made in posts or roadtests - not sure why a Golf (of undefined spec. )is a benchmark anyway.
|
|
Having driven, briefly, both an X5 and a Range Rover I would say that you are very aware of the high centre of gravity of these vehicles. No doubt there is good ultimate grip but I dont particularly like the high and remote feel that these cars have. The Range Rover was worse in this respect. Personally I didnt like the sensation at all, I didnt feel fully in control.
|
|
Me neither. Hated a friend's Disco. It felt like floating on jelly.
|
|
|
|
