The F1 & motorsport thread - Vol 15 - Dynamic Dave

***** This thread is now closed, please CLICK HERE to go to Volume 16 *****


As the title suggests, this thread is for all things Formula One and other general motorsport related stuff.

This is Volume 15.

Usual rules apply. When we get to around 100 posts, the thread will be locked and the next volume will start.

PLEASE NOTE

As with the IHAQ & the Computer threads, When posting a NEW topic, please "Reply to" the first message in this thread, i.e. this one. This keeps each topic in it's own separate segment and stops each new topic from getting mixed up in amongst existing topics. Also please remember to change the subject header.


Edited by Webmaster on 09/10/2007 at 02:00

WMSC hearing - Paris - Dynamic Dave
I'm sure we haven't heard the last of the McLaren debate, so continue here with your discussion:-
WMSC hearing (contd.) - J Bonington Jagworth
"Ferrari will not drop their legal cases" (said jbif)

Pretty unwise, IMHO. They should quit while they're ahead, or who knows what will be uncovered...
WMSC hearing (contd.) - cheddar
jbif said:

>>So according to Cheddar, McLaren rebuilt their car from scratch sometime after 28 April 2007.>>

No I did not say that. Coughlan had Ferrari data as early as mid March, by this time the McLaren car was clearly complete however the cars are developed from race to race and test to test as indicated by the exchnage of e-mails indicating that they wanted to to try Ferrari weight distribution on their car.


>>Incidentally in a reply above you said " itv-f1 mention e-mails, Autosport dont. "
The same story as at ITV was carried by Autosport www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/62376

The point is that Ron has not said that he informed the FIA about e-mails on the 5th August. The reference to e-mails in the Autosport article applies to after the FIA had received info on e-mails from the drivers and is not within the quote from Ron Dennis.
WMSC hearing (contd.) - jbif
! * No I did not say that. *

eh? Cheddar, then what did you say here:
www.honestjohn.co.uk/forum/post/index.htm?v=e&t=55...4
www.honestjohn.co.uk/forum/post/index.htm?t=55800&...e
" having at the beginining of the season, a 780 page dosier enabling a competitors car to be built from scratch "

WMSC hearing (contd.) - cheddar
Come on jbif, saying that McLaren had a 780 page dosier enabling a competitors car to be built from scratch is not the same as saying that McLaren actually rebuilt their car from scratch!

The objective was to illustrate the depth of the data available to them however the value of the document would have been in knowing what Ferrari were doing, comparing Ferrari data with their own thus refining their understanding, perhaps being able to try some of Ferrari' ideas at a component level, though certainly not rebuilding an entire car.
WMSC hearing (contd.) - J Bonington Jagworth
I understood that it was a manual for the car, not the plans for it!

If yesterday's race was anything to go by, McLaren haven't benefitted much...
WMSC hearing (contd.) - jbif
" Come on jbif, etc.etc. "

Come on, Cheddar.
You said "beginning of the season" - end of April 2007 was not the beginning.
You said "780 page dosier [sic] enabling to be built from scratch" . McLaren did not even copy a tiny little single item from the Ferrari documents.

As I said in the preious volumes, FIA decision was based on conjecture as to what McLaren could ahve done had they been so inclined to tap in to the information that one allegedly rogue employee was obtaining from some yet unconfirmed source in Ferrari. Remember that Stepney has so far denied his alleged part in this saga). The two main alleged parties, Stepney and Coughlan, for some mystrerious reason, have not been brought in front of the FIA kangaroo court.

"seems", "could have", "may have" etc etc. All inuendo and no substance. The hard evidence is simply not there. Not a single instance of "did copy Ferrari design" or "did benefit from Ferarri secrets".

I think I have exhaused all I have to say on this subject. It has curdled my brain cells to cheese.

WMSC hearing (contd.) - cheddar
You said "beginning of the season" - end of April 2007 was not the beginning.


Who said anything about April, Coughlan says he first received info from Stepney in mid March, the first race was around the 16th March IIRC.


>>McLaren did not even copy a tiny little single item from the Ferrari documents.
>>

How do you know?

.......... FIA decision was based on conjecture as to what McLaren could ahve done .......... "seems" "could have" "may have" etc etc. All inuendo and no substance. The hard evidence is simply not there. Not a single instance of "did copy Ferrari design" or "did benefit from Ferarri secrets".


The WMSC report says "The evidence leads the WMSC to conclude that some degree of sporting advantage was obtained".


Regards.


PS: Coughlan and Stepney are another issue. The WMSC council knew that McLaren had Ferrari data and ruled on that matter, how they got the data is , I suggest, outside of the WMSC juristiction and hence is a legal matter.
WMSC hearing (contd.) - jbif
point 1
! * >> You said "beginning of the season" - end of April 2007 was not the beginning.>> Who said anything about April,

see
" having at the beginining of the season, a 780 page dosier enabling a competitors car to be built from scratch "
www.honestjohn.co.uk/forum/post/index.htm?v=e&t=55...4
www.honestjohn.co.uk/forum/post/index.htm?t=55800&...e

Let me try one more time: The 780 page document was passed to Coughlan at the end of April 2007. End fo April is not beginning of the season.

pont 2
! >>McLaren did not even copy a tiny little single item from the Ferrari documents.>> How do you know?

Cheddar, do you have any such evidence? If so, you had better follow the example of the copy shop employee.
The WMSC report says there is no evidence. There is absolutely no evidence that McLaren used any of the info to change any of their designs. McLaren's design and manufacturing team of 150 or so people have given legal written statements saying so. The FIA and Ferrari have produced no such evidence either. The WMSC do say that there is a lack of real evidence. But that lack of evidence still leads them to come to a bizarre conclusion. I think they should really have said in their report "The lack of real evidence still leads the WMSC to conclude etc.etc. "

It seems that Cheddar is indulging in a circular argument even against himself. Witness your denial the meaning behind what that you said:
" having at the beginining of the season, a 780 page dosier enabling a competitors car to be built from scratch ".

WMSC hearing (contd.) - cheddar
Cheddar do you have any such evidence? >>


No I dont have evidence as to what McLaren copied, the point is that the WMSC have evidence that lead them to say "The evidence leads the WMSC to conclude that some degree of sporting advantage was obtained". That may or not include evidence regarding copying the Ferrari data howevber in the context of the case being proved to have posessed or copied are little different I would suggest.

It seems that Cheddar is indulging in a circular argument even against himself. Witness your denial the meaning behind what that you said: "having at the beginining of the season a 780 page dosier enabling a competitors car to be built from scratch ".>>


Circular argument? Denial?

Really not sure where you are coming from there jbif though if you are taking issue with me that I said 780 page doc at beginning of season when perhaps Coughlan got it at the end of April - though that is unclear, then I apologise for misleading you.

However Coughlan has said that he received info from Stepney from mid March (Quote: "But he did not pass any technical information about Ferrari to me until mid-March 2007.") and IIRC the published e-mail exchange was end March. In the context of now, you could argue that it was the beggining of the season, just after the 3rd race afterall.


jbif, you seem keen to argue two minor points in the context of the case, so I assume we concurr otherwise ;-)
WMSC hearing (contd.) - Cardew
Cheddar,
I asked this question before; and didn't get an answer.

If Stepney(who was unhappy at not getting Ross Brawn's job) had gone to work for Mclaren in, say, March 2007 what are your views on what he could have brought with him? and would that have saved Mclaren $100,000,000 and loss of points etc?
F1 secrets left on the web - rtj70
You'll all love this I'm sure... it transpires the document posted by the FIA included a lot of info weshould not have seen. But they didn't blank it out of the PDF document properly. It's gone now apparently.... :-(

www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/20/formula_one_sensi.../

Exerpt:

"Fédération Internationale de l' Automobile (FIA) diligently published transcripts from those hearings on its website including a 115-page document released on 13 September, the day the McLaren verdict was reached.

But, despite blacking out secret information on the PDF transcript before posting it on the internet, the French-based motor sport council failed to realise that a simple copy and paste of the document into any text-based file revealed the hidden data."



Doh!
F1 secrets left on the web - rtj70
And some comments on that article make me laugh:

1. How much will the FIA fine itself for passing the secrets to all teams.
2. It will be interesting with 22 Ferrari's on the grid.
F1 secrets left on the web - Lud
1. How much will the FIA fine itself for passing the secrets to all teams.

>>

Tee hee!
F1 secrets left on the web - rtj70
Finding the doc would be good. I've started reading it and things like the Mclaren designer salary and weight distrubution are mentioned... but not visible anymore.

F1 secrets left on the web - martint123
If you read the comments there's a link to a site that hosts this:-
www.rtl.nl/sport/rtl_gp/components/formule1/nieuws...f

Find a bit of text blacked out and just cut and paste it to see what lies underneath. - computer illiterates!
F1 secrets left on the web - rtj70
I obviously didn't read all comments or some not there when I read them ;-) Thanks. But it looks busy :-(
F1 secrets left on the web - rtj70
So the silly Coughlan was on £300-400k pa! What an idiot. I'll have his job. Not that I'm qualified.
F1 secrets left on the web - J Bonington Jagworth
"It's gone now apparently.."

Thanks to El Reg pointing it out to them! I wish they'd pointed it out to us first...
F1 secrets left on the web - rtj70
I've got a copy if you let me know where to send. In the end not too much is blanked out though :-( Not too many juicy bits at all.
F1 secrets left on the web - J Bonington Jagworth
"Not too many juicy bits at all"

Pity. Nice to know you've got it, though. Not enough for McLaren to sue over, I suppose?
F1 secrets left on the web - jbif
J B Jagworth; the links given in the Register article and rtl.nl link allow you to download the original FIA pdf file which can be re-read on a text reader to reveal the hidden stuff.

Incidentally, the following bits are not hidden, and to me they were interesting as they answered my questions asked in this thread's earlier volumes.

QUOTE1:
Nigel TOZZI: That is not quite right. You know what Mr Mosley said in his letter dated 6 September 2007. You know what the explanation is: Mr Alonso apparently showed some information to someone else.
Ron DENNIS: I have not seen anything anywhere indicating who said what to whom. To this day, I do not know how this came to Max's attention, apart from my telling him. Only Bernie may said that he had seen something and said he would pass it to Max. I do not know what that is. I do know that Bernie said it was in Spanish, but I do not know how this material came to the knowledge of the FIA.

QUOTE2:
Nigel TOZZI: If Alonso had not shown the documents to Mr Ecclestone, and Mr Ecclestone had not alerted Mr Mosley, who then wrote to the drivers, we would not have found out about these e-mails. Is that not so?
Ron DENNIS: The simple fact is that they did not even exist, as far as I was concerned. Nothing existed, because he said that he retracted it, that it did not happen. I phoned Max and said that he had retracted it and calmed down.

QUOTE3:
Nigel TOZZI: Why is Mr Alonso not here?
Ron DENNIS: Mr Alonso is not here because he does not want to be here. He does not speak to anyone much. He is a remarkable recluse for a driver. He is not here by choice. Moreover, he said he had other things to do by previous arrangement. I cannot force him to come. We asked him to come.

QUOTE4:
Nigel TOZZI: The computer searches carried out by both your experts and ours did not turn up the e-mail exchanges which Mr de la Rosa and Mr Alonso have now disclosed.
Ron DENNIS: Nor was anything found on the computers that you held on the morning of the 3rd.


F1 secrets left on the web - ForumNeedsModerating
I skimmed the pdf in question - yes, the 'censored' bits did seem a bit lame. Overall & prima facie, the 'evidence' looked remarkably thin & certainly wouldn't have supported a conviction in a proper court (well, maybe in Italy..) A decent brief would have torn it to tiny shreds. I think McLaren in not challenging the FIA decision directly may have done themsleves a disservice - or maybe (and rather admirably) they bit the bullet for the good of F1 in general.

My initial thoughts about the competence & impartiality of the FIA & their cohorts are reinforced.

F1 secrets left on the web - henry k
>>My initial thoughts about the competence & impartiality of the FIA & their cohorts are einforced.

news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/70...m
"Was the McLaren spy verdict wrong? "
Other than the FIA, where does the money go? - umistim
This huge sum to be paid by Mclaren, it goes to the FIA I understand, what right have they to benefit financially from this spat between two teams.
It is a punishment for an alleged transgression but they should not be the beneficiary.
Other than the FIA, where does the money go? - rtj70
I believe the sum will be divided between all other teams including Ferrari.
Other than the FIA, where does the money go? - mjm
I think Bernie or Max said that at least some of it would be used to fund the lower echelons of the sport at youngster level.
Japanese Grand Prix - Dynamic Dave
TV schedules for this weekends race:-

Live qualifying Saturday 0530-0720 ITV3

Qualifying re-run Saturday 1000-1120 ITV1


Live race Sunday 0430-0735 ITV1

Race re-run Sunday 1130-1330 ITV1
Japanese Grand Prix - ForumNeedsModerating
Race re-run Sunday 1130-1330 ITV1

FIA ruling - just in case Ferrari don't win.
Japanese Grand Prix - Robin Reliant
Hamilton was interviewed on 5 live criticising Alonso's lack of loyalty to the team. In the present climate I would be surprised if he took the decision to make a remark that would increase the tension between himself and his team-mate, I couldn't help wondering if Ron put him up to it as a way of having a dig?

Either way, I would be surprised if McLaren had the same driver lineup next season.
--
Japanese Grand Prix - dxp55
This has to have been best race all season - edge of seat for two hours -- Had to feel sorry for Webber.
Japanese Grand Prix - Manatee
Yes, and after the poor bloke had been uncle dick in his hat as well. He certainly gets his share of bad luck.

Impressive from Hamilton in his first seriously wet race - but contrast to Webber he had the rub of the green when Kubica ran into him.
Japanese Grand Prix - Dynamic Dave
Just watched it. Been avoiding news reports all day. Glad I also set the Sky+ box to record the programme that followed as well because of past problems where ITV cannot sort out their EPG times to extend programmes that overun.

Excellent race.

I wonder if the language of the owner of Red Bull was as colourful as Mark Webbers?
Japanese Grand Prix - Armitage Shanks {p}
And on a course he hadn't seen until a few days before the race! The man has gonads of steel, if not titanium to save weight!
Japanese Grand Prix - Dynamic Dave
And on a course he hadn't seen until a few days before the race!


Same applied to the other 21 drivers as well.
Japanese Grand Prix - Armitage Shanks {p}
Shows much I know! I guess it has been used before but so long ago that none of the current drivers had seen it or was a genuine 'first'
Japanese Grand Prix - AlastairW
Fuji was last used in 1978ish, when Villeneuve crashed into the crowd, killing spectators. Britons will of course remember that it was at this circuit in 1976 that James Hunt clinched his championship in a similarly wet race.
Japanese Grand Prix - Ian (Cape Town)
Fuji is still used in the Japanese domestic motor racing calendar, and as somebody commentated over the weekend, some of the drivers DO have experience there.

As mentioned elsewhere, it was the raceway where Niki Luda withdrew in 1976, due to torrential rain - thus giving the title to James Hunt, as well as severely annoying Messrs Ferrari!

Great race, I thought... and how we laughed at Louise Goodman and Mark Webber...
"We don't need that filthy language!"

Japanese Grand Prix - Citroënian {P}
Great race, but that pink fluffy dice Allen shouted over Brundle as Hamilton held up Alonso before the SC pull in. I think MB was about to say Hamilton was out of order doing what he was doing. I would love to know if that was the case. Instead, we were treated to a list of positions, which funnily enough hadn't changed in 19 laps under the safety car. He should know when to shut up.

That aside this race almost had me up at 0530 watch; a bottle of red saw to that, but it is becoming interesting. The final lap with Massa was absolutely brilliant, the way the racing should be and used to be when it was good.

Will be rooting for Lewis in China, shame that running Alonso off the circuit wouldn't win the championship for him....

Oh, and Button looked like a bit of a chump complaining about the weather, the stewards, the car, his team, in fact anything apart from his ability....ever since he got that goatee he seems to think he's better than his performances and record would suggest.
-------------------------
07 Kia Ceed LS
05 Citroën C4 VT
04 Mazda MX5
85 Mini Mayfair
Japanese Grand Prix - Cardew
>> And on a course he hadn't seen until a few days before the race!

Same applied to the other 21 drivers as well.


I thought some had seen raced on it - but not in F1 cars - they interviewed a couple of drivers.

Hamilton was seriously impressive all weekend.

At least Alonso didn't try to make excuses and seems resigned to losing his crown unless Hamilton has major problems in both remaining races
Japanese Grand Prix - ForumNeedsModerating
Good race and all that. I find myself though, becoming a little tired of LH & the butter wouldn't melt , slightly teacher's pet persona. My respect for Alonso went up a few notches - he comes across as being a bit more 'human' than his team-mate. Big rispekk for all those drivers - however much they earn, driving at 150+ mph with minimal vision requires considerable bottle.
Japanese Grand Prix - L'escargot
I'd like Lewis Hamilton a lot more if he displayed a bit more humility and didn't resort to all that frenetic pumping of the air. A modest wave would be quite sufficient. He'd do well to take a few lessons from behaviour of the such gentlemen as Graham Hill, Jim Clark, Stirling Moss, Jackie Stewart etc.

Who started the air-pumping craze anyway?
--
L\'escargot.
Japanese Grand Prix - ForumNeedsModerating
Who started the air-pumping craze anyway?

Historically attributed (from: 'Things you didn't Know about Luton' by Allun Pardue) to Brian
Westmacott when playing for Luton Town FC in Southern Area (later Vauxhall Conference)
League play-offs in 1969, after scoring a late goal to secure victory over the St. Albans Centurions.
Japanese Grand Prix - DP
Whether he pulls off the title or not, what Lewis Hamilton has achieved this year is just remarkable! Despite the incessant whining from the Spaniard who he has simply outdriven all season, despite the dirty tricks campaign from Ferrari, and despite the attention of the turnpikes in the gutter press, he's gone out there and done the job, shown unwavering loyalty to his team, and unlike another young British driver, hasn't resorted to badmouthing or mud slinging.

I wish him all the success in the world. F1 will eventually turn him into an arrogant prima-donna just like it does everyone else, but for now he's alright. I'll be cheering him on right to the end.

Cheers
DP
--
04 Grand Scenic 1.9 dCi Dynamique
00 Mondeo 1.8TD LX
Japanese Grand Prix - Lud
Can't think why everyone thinks it was a good race. Half boring procession, half spray cloud. It's true there was plenty of incident, but not the sort you watch really.

The right man won. Alonso was very rational and cool when interviewed after the race. Poor Mark Webber, rotten luck (and rotten luck for the sprog who ran into him too).
Japanese Grand Prix - colin-e
I've taken to Sky plussing (if its not a verb, it should be!) the Grand Prix.

I can have a leisurely Sunday lunch, and then fast forward through the boring bits to watch the good bits (cynics would say "the adverts").

Nineteen laps of safety car action at 12X speed actually looks exciting!
--
Colin-E
Japanese Grand Prix - peterb
"Nineteen laps of safety car action at 12X speed actually looks exciting!"

I watch most races at between 4x and 6x speed. It has the added bonus of silencing James Allen.....
Japanese Grand Prix - Vettel docked 10 places - henry k
Poor Mark Webber rotten luck (and rotten luck for the sprog who ran into him too).

>>
Following an investigation by the stewards, it was decided that Vettel had breached Article 16.1 of the F1 Sporting Regulations, for causing a collision, so will be docked 10 places at his next race.

Vettel earlier apologized to Webber about the incident and claimed he had been caught out by Lewis Hamilton braking heavily ahead of the pair of them.

"I was behind Lewis (Hamilton) and Mark (Webber) in the safety car phase and I was exiting Turn 13 and saw Lewis going really, really slow all of a sudden," he said. "I reacted and I was not on full power at the time, and at the same moment I was looking back to the front I was in Mark's rear.

"I think he reacted to Lewis, to not pass him but of course it is a shame. We were very, very strong in the race, we were very, very fast and we would have managed to finish on the podium easily."


Japanese Grand Prix - Leif
Whether he pulls off the title or not what Lewis Hamilton has achieved this year
is just remarkable!


I quite agree. To win one race in year one is remarkable. To lead the pack this late in the season is incredible. He seems a very pleasant lad to me. Good luck to him.
Japanese Grand Prix - stunorthants26
I was one of the crazies to get up for the 5:30 kick off and despite the safety car issue, it was still interesting and had me watching far more intently than normal. This season has woken up my interest again and next year looks to be well worth a few early mornings if this one is anything to go by.

LH may have a touch of arrogance about him, but he isnt stupid - he knows he's good but he is still quite modest and lets not forget he is still very young and prone to excitability, so what, who wasnt at 21?
Let him punch the air, he is setting records and performing way beyond expectation, unlike our other british drivers.
I for one cant wait to see him win the championship, he is very deserving. Atleast he isnt deliberately parking his car on corners or trying to settled the championship by driving into Alonso, unlike someone else who now hides in the background at Ferrari may have done.

I for one would like to see a few more wet races, its the unpredictability that makes it so watchable.


Japanese Grand Prix - rtj70
Surprised nobody else said this... Alonso brought in for a pit stop first and let out in traffic. Hamilton brought in next and let out in front of traffic. Did the team engineer the margin we all wanted? And then Alonso crashed himself anyway.

Lewis Hamilton drove well in the conditions but surprised how well Ferrari did after so man stops. Maybe in the dry they would have been a real challenge.

As for really good driving, Button was pretty fast without the front wing... that took some skill. Put him in the Mclaren next season and see who's better? Him or Lewis?
Japanese Grand Prix - henry k
Surprised nobody else said this...
Alonso brought in for a pit stop first and let out in traffic.
Hamilton brought in next and let out in front of traffic.
Did the team engineer the margin we all wanted?

>>
IIRC Alonso had a poor IN lap ( later reported he went off track ?) thus screwing it up so he did not emerge in front of the traffic that was planned to occur. So no blame on the team.
Japanese Grand Prix. Ferrari excuse!! - henry k
This made me smile.
Zillions of ££s spent but Ferrari depend on an email to tell them to use wet tyres.
As Brundle said " WE knew" re wet tyres so how come Ferrari did not?
Their excuse below


Ferrari's complaint that it only found out after the race that the FIA had forbidden cars to start the race without extreme wet tyres.
"The message reached the other ten teams," Haug, competition director for McLaren's engine and equity partner Mercedes, told German television.
"Ferrari always excite themselves when they do not win," said the German. "That is not new," he told the broadcaster RTL.

Haug refused to speculate as to how the FIA stewards' email about the rule change only arrived in sporting boss Stefano Domenicali's laptop inbox nearly 90 minutes too late.
"I am not the Ferrari press person - I have no idea what they were doing at noon," he added.



Japanese Grand Prix. Ferrari excuse!! - rtj70
Email was not needed was it? Conditions so bad they start behind the safety car. Had it been dry enough there would have been a normal start and even then on "wet tyres" or "extreme wets" as they are now called.

Safety car used for safety and it was out a while :-) But Ferrari did not do so bad despite the many stops which they could have avoided. And the drive through penalty (done twice due to doing it when SC out?) for Massa.
Japanese Grand Prix. Ferrari excuse!! - BobbyG
This may be a stupid question. But why start a "race" behind a safety car? If it is considered too unsafe to drive / race, then why not delay the start until conditions improve?
Was it a case of using the cars tyres to clear the track?

You would not have a football match where, for the first 30 minutes, no team is allowed to pass, tackle or score?


--
2007 Seat Altea XL 2.0 TDI (140) Stylance
2005 Skoda Fabia vrS
Japanese Grand Prix. Ferrari excuse!! - rtj70
Suspect you are right in thinking car tyres used to dry out the track. The move a lot of water with those extreme wet tyres.
Japanese Grand Prix. Ferrari excuse!! - martint123


The many millions of people watching on TV - and the advertisers and sponsors.
"The show must go on". Remember, this is entertainment, not sport!
Japanese Grand Prix. Ferrari excuse!! - Baskerville
You would not have a football match where for the first 30 minutes no team
is allowed to pass tackle or score?


You're not an Arsenal fan then.
Alonso wants split from Hamilton - henry k
news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/70...m
Alonso wants split from Hamilton - rogue-trooper
can someone explain why this spat has happened? I believe that Alonso wanted better treatment than the rookie but what is this "better treatment"?

Did the argument between them stem from the Hugarian GP and the blocking tactics during qualifying or is there something else.
Alonso wants split from Hamilton - DP
I read somewhere that the whinging Spaniard demanded no1 status in the team or he would give potentially damaging evidence in the whole Ferrari espionage row.

Not something you do to a businessman of Ron Dennis's calibre, and especially not when he's your employer.


--
04 Grand Scenic 1.9 dCi Dynamique
00 Mondeo 1.8TD LX
Alonso wants split from Hamilton - Ian (Cape Town)
If Alonso leaves, he'll probably take the Santander sponsorship with him.
Is Ron fussed? Nope - cos he has a line of blokes outside his door with chequebooks ready to take up the gap on sponsorship, thnx to LH....
Alonso wants split from Hamilton - stunorthants26
I think Alonso needs to be paired with someone who flatters his ego, not someone who makes him look redundant. LH could become one of the biggest sporting heros of this decade if he carries on as he has been.

Alonso wants split from Hamilton - DP
LH could become one of the biggest sporting heros of
this decade if he carries on as he has been.


I couldn't agree more!

Cheers
DP
--
04 Grand Scenic 1.9 dCi Dynamique
00 Mondeo 1.8TD LX
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - Screwloose
Oh; dear....

news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/70...m

{Header re-titled, etc, as per the 'Please note' message a the top of this thread - DD}
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - jbif
" Oh; dear.... news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/70...m "

I am not betting on Hamilton losing all the points from Japan, and being penalised 10 places in China.

I think it will be a shame if that happens because to keep a maximum of 5 places behind the safety car in those atrocious conditions is an impossible task. I wonder if the rules were drawn up for dry or sem-iwet conditions and flooded circuits were not in their mind at the time.

As I see it, the Japanese fan's video posted on youtube and also shown on autosportc.om shows that Hamilton brakes hard trying to avoid running in to the safety car. He then runs wide while Webber merrily speeds up within a few car lenghs of the sagety car, then brakes to avoid overtaking Hamilton who has slid off to the right. This catches Vettel unawre and Bang! Crash! and we have a new controversy.

All thanks to a spectator's video evidence.

Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - PR {P}
He did it earlier aswell, just before the safety car came in for the first time, he was really driving erratically, to the point Martin Brundle labled him stupid!
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - Kevin
So the 'best' drivers in the world are suddenly thrown into headless chicken-mode by another driver not doing what they expected him to do eh?

Someone in front braking and pulling over to the right causes such confusion that they run into each other eh?

Glub help them if they ever have to drive through central Reading.

Kevin...
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - Lud
So the 'best' drivers in the world are suddenly thrown into headless chicken-mode by another
driver not doing what they expected
Glub help them if they ever have to drive through central Reading.

>>

Tee hee Kevin, excellent.

It would never have occurred to me that anyone behind the 'safety car', excellent misnomer, would deliberately drive in such a way as to cause difficulty to others.

I find it hard to believe that anyone did anything but get fazed by the torrential rain, clouds of spray and safety car only doing 100 or so so the cars aquaplaned because no downforce to speak of.

I will be surprised if Hamilton is penalised, and a bit upset.
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - tunacat
Good!
I don't like Hamilton. Too flippin smug.

How come all the pundits never predicted more than a moderate-to-good rookie season for him, and then he looks to be walking away with it?

I suppose if Schumacher was still there and Hamilton was giving him a pasting, I'd like him then, cos I never liked Schumacher once he'd moved from Benetton.

Irrational, isn't it. But that's sport for you. A Chelsea supporter I know acknowledges Man Utd are good, but hates them all the same.

Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - Citroënian {P}
Le tour this year was destroyed by a well meaning organising body - trying to do the right thing, they ended up with a farce.

If LH loses his points and gets demoted down the grid, then the FIA will have gone down the same road and will have soured what has been probably the best season for the last few years.

Championships should be decided on the track, not in offices.

Webber and Vettel were pressing the pedals and turning the wheel. They'll have been hauled over the coals by Toro Rossa/Red Bull and rightly so. But trying to blame someone else? Poor show.

Think back to Coluthard slowing down at Spa and ending up with Schuey's Ferrari in the back of him. Racing incident, build a bridge and get over it!


-------------------------
07 Kia Ceed LS
05 Citroën C4 VT
04 Mazda MX5
85 Mini Mayfair
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - Citroënian {P}
Rossa should have been Rosso .... got to agree the genders...
-------------------------
07 Kia Ceed LS
05 Citroën C4 VT
04 Mazda MX5
85 Mini Mayfair
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - billy25
>>keep a maximum of 5 places behind the safety car in those atrocious conditions is an impossible task. <<

Struggling to keep position is one thing, but deliberate errattic driving is another. The ITV coverage definately favours the latter. Whether or not this attributed to the accident or not is to be decided, but if (erratic driving) shown to have be contributery to the incident then Hamilton should be penalised. At least it will ensure that the racing goes all the way to the wire ;-)

Billy
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - ForumNeedsModerating
I believe braking & swerving are commonly used, both in SC conditions & on 1st lap starts - have been for many seasons now. Just look at the warm-up lap of any GP - there's much brake & tyre warming going on & no doubt some gamesmanship too The only difference this time was the heavy rain & wet track - isn't the onus in any following car to maintain (and being fully aware that tyre/brake heat maintenance will occur in cars preceding & following) a safe braking distance?

I watched the video in question on EweToob, Webber has no (apparent) difficulty keeping behind LH, but Vettel has difficulty keeping behind Webber (..he crashes into him)

LH does go off the 'racing line' - but in the conditions & behind the SC, that does seems a mute & rather academic point. Webber chose to follow the 'racing line' and kept behind LH, (who in turn kepy behind the SC) - Vettel simply misjudged his stopping distance.
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - J Bonington Jagworth
"a mute & rather academic point"

Indeed. IIRC, Hamilton got penalised a while back for not staying behind the SC, so no big surprise if he reacted suddenly to its appearance! Poor bloke - damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. After this season's trials and tribulations, I'd be tempted to stash the money away and take up something more restful, like alligator-wrestling...

WRT his 'erratic driving', strange that someone so inept could stay in front of everyone else and still stay on the track in conditions that defeated several other notable contenders.
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - Muggy
Am I the only one who suspects Alonso persuading people to speak up might be behind this Hamilton complaint...?!
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - Screwloose
woodbines

Have you got a U-Toob link, as all the searches bring up is:-

"This link has been removed due to an copyright claim by Formula 1 Management..."
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - ForumNeedsModerating
>>Have you got a U-Toob link, as all the searches bring up is:

Sorry, it was pulled about 1-2 hrs ago. Does seem a bit petty minded of F1M to have claimed exclusive copyright though. Obviously don't like 'evidence' in the public domain.
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - J Bonington Jagworth
"Does seem a bit petty minded of F1M to have claimed exclusive copyright"

It does, but I expect there's some small print on the tickets about distribution of video material. I smell a rat if they're only now pursuing a matter that was transmitted around the world at the time. They don't like McLaren, do they?
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - rogue-trooper
Try this

tinyurl.com/yrw69m

Seems that Hamilton pulled wide and slowed so that others had to do the same so as not to overtake.
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - rtj70
We are all assuming the erratic driving in question is the bit before the Webber accident.

Looking at that clip a few times it seems to me LH had to go wide or he might have hit or overtaken the safety car. He did slow down too. But he was getting close to the safety car.

The others were going too fast and probably too close to not overtake and slammed on the brakes and the crash happened. Could they have not just followed his line? He might have been avoiding a big puddle or something. If Webber had gone into LH's car due to hard braking that would have been a different matter.

Now earlier in the race when behind the safety car (including the first stint) LH did break hard quite a few times and that was erratic and stupid - someone could have run into him. But maybe he was trying to get heat into the tyres because at those low speeds and in deep water on the track the tyre pressures must have been getting low.

This season has had some crazy things happen so I would not be suprised if he got punished but perhaps a 10sec drive through penalty would have been fairer.
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - Screwloose
angelman

Thanks for that link; very illuminating - I can see why Mark Webber thought that LH had a problem.

He could be in a spot of bother over that, as there are grounds for saying that the Webber/Vettel crash was directly - if inadvertently - caused by his action.

His best defence would be to say that, unsighted by the SC's spray from those appalling conditions, he missed the corner entry and had to recover slowly round the outside just to keep a cold-tyred car on the track.
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - rtj70
I wish I hadn't erased the F1 on the V+ box now.

Do I recall correctly that Hamilton was asked about this after the race. We know he said the car didn't feel right.

Watched the clip a few more times and you could see he was going to go wide before he did. His line through the corner meant he had to or he'd have either had to break hard or maybe overtake the SC or hit it.

And he did also slow down but again he might have been aquaplaning and so lifted off the throttle or something similar.

The two drivers colliding have only themselves to blame.

Personally, in such poor weather I do not think they should have raced but drivers' safety put behind TV coverage/sponsors etc. In the past races might have been stopped for weather like that.
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - Red Baron
Lh was first in line. He had a responsibility to follow the safety car, not perform theatrics behind it. He no doubt had to brake hard as he almost overtook the SC himself after he acellerated for what, exactly? The only way he could give himself enough room to slow down without overtaking the SC was to go wide in that corner.

Be the itme Vettel realised that he had to brake, he had nowhere to go but the back of Webber or LH.

Why was LH performing tyre and brake warming manouevres?!? The SC was not pulling in any time soon. The volume of water around would soon cool disperse any heat. Pointless.

All LH has to do was follow the SC. At least partially his fault.
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - rtj70
"volume of water around would soon cool disperse any heat. Pointless."

Lack of heat in the tyres will have been a problem and they will have lacked heat because they were going so slow.

I would imagine following any cars will not have been easy in those conditions and with such wide tyres it is easy to aquaplane. I don't think LH is blameless but if the others were meant to follow him maybe they should have gone wide.

No doubt we will see another FIA decision that might not be so good for sport. I still say that they maybe should have penalised him with a stop-go penalty at the weekend.

Personally I think they should have not raced in those conditions - madness. Entertaining but actual madness. The rain initially stopped but came back and will have been why Alonso crashed and others too.
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - rtj70
Here's the quote that will be difficult to place too much blame on Hamilton. It's by Vettel...

Vettel said at the time that he had hit Webber while distracted by Hamilton slowing unexpectedly... "I was exiting turn 13 and looking at Lewis, because all of a sudden he seemed to slow down really much and I thought he had a problem at that stage," Vettel told ITV Sport's Louise Goodman in Japan.

So he was distracted by Hamilton. So if Hamilton slowed down because he DID have a problem, Vettel would still have hit Webber because of the distraction. The fact Hamilton did not have a problem....

Probably find they doc him 107 points tomorrow.
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - Cardew
It is a heaven sent opportunity to take some action against LH to keep viewers interested for the next two races.

The rights or wrongs of the situation are irrelevant.

If Webber was leading the world championship by a big margin he would have had action taken against him for taking out Vettel.

If Vettel was leading the world championship by a big margin he would have had action taken against him for taking out Webber.

If LH was trailing Alonso by several points after winning the Japanese GP, it would be a certainty that no action would be taken!

Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - Screwloose
If LH was trailing Alonso by several points after winning the Japanese GP it would
be a certainty that no action would be taken!


But Alonso would be docked points for crashing and not scoring any.....
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - Robin Reliant
McLaren must be fuming at Alonso's comments. If Hamilton is docked his ten points it puts both Ferrari drivers back in with a chance of winning the championship. I can see the Hamilton/Alonso verbal sparring match turning physical in the near future, with Ron Dennis holding the Spaniard's hands behind his back.
--
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - rtj70
Hamilton did do some erratic driving in terms of brake and acclerate but that was mostly before the safety car going. He certaintly did before the SC went and I think he could do that.

The accident "behind" him was not only down to him. He may have played a part but his tyres and brakes were in need of periodic "warming" and Vettel looked at Lewis's car and ran into Webber.

Shouldn't the cars behind LH follow him. At a safe distance. And with spray reducing visibility follow far enough back to see what he was doing? I still think the race should not have run in the conditions... not really safe.

Personally would have though the RB/TR teams deserved what looked like at leasr 2nd/3rd places.
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - Screwloose

Yes; I loved Alonso's "I didn't see the race - but I'm sure he must have been at fault..." speech.

Unfortunately; if it comes to blows between the Incredible Whinge and LH, Ron won't be able to hold his arms, as he'll already have both hands round his throat.
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - BobbyG
Think we should just do away with safety cars - they are not safe!!

Lets stop wrapping these drivers in cotton wool - let them go and drive in the rain and see who really is the best driver. Best driver is not just about speed, its about adjusting both driving style and car to the conditions.

And then take a Grand Prix to Scandinavia and let us see some snow on the track......
--
2007 Seat Altea XL 2.0 TDI (140) Stylance
2005 Skoda Fabia vrS
Hamilton faces Japan win Inquiry - mike hannon
If the Vettel-Webber shunt had happened on an ordinary road it would be a no-brainer, wouldn't it?
"Sorry guv, I was watching the guy in front of you and didn't realise you were still in my way.''

The real problem here seems to me that we are entering a new phase of audience participation - every race (or match, or whatever) will be subject to a post-mortem as the whole world looks at and pronounces their verdicts on odd bits of video on You-tube shot by spectators while the cameras weren't looking.
Presumably no race result will be available for any event until a few weeks of world-wide argy-bargy.

{edit to remove last sentence requested by author - DD}

Edited by Webmaster on 06/10/2007 at 14:05

The "spying" was two way?? - martint123
Tucked into the bottom of the 'dangerous driving' story was this in the Express

Former Ferrari chief mechanic Nigel Stepney, who was sacked after being accused of sabotage and espionage, has claimed that the Italian team spied on McLaren. Stepney and suspended McLaren chief designer Mike Coughlan worked together in the spy row and the ex-Ferrari man said:

?I got information about when they were stopping. I got weight distribution, I got other aspects of various parts of their car from him.

?Ferrari got off very lightly. I was their employee at the time. I was aware of certain stuff they were doing at tests, fuel levels, for example.

I knew what fuel level they were running. They should have been docked points.



Hmmmmmmmm, I did wonder.