Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - Falkirk Bairn
It is Ins time again - renewal request through the door.

I have tried the comparison sites in the past but their guide prices can differ from the actual premium when you log on to the Ins Co Site - so I tried a few Ins Co sites directly.

Prices as you would expect varied from £150 - £220 for Comp - On the Zurich site they gave a premium of just under £150 (Competitive Premium and a £200 excess) - for interest I clicked the TPF&T button so see what I could save:

SURPRISE - TPF&T £175 - £26 more for less cover.
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - Pugugly {P}
They're trying to shake it off that's why.
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - pendulum
It's the same story with TP vs TPF&F. Selecting TP only is often more expensive than TPF&F. Again more money for less cover. No idea why!
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - Stuartli
I've just switched from DirectLine to Zurich - comprehensive cover renewal cost down from just over £180 to £148 and includes recovery service.

This morning, a few days after the documents came through, I got a credit card size plastic version of the certificate of insurance, which saves having to fold the big paper version up to carry around and is accepted as evidence when renewing the VEL at post offices.

Paper version only required if you go abroad; it details the cover available in several languages.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
What\'s for you won\'t pass you by
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - L'escargot
In the long run comprehensive could well be cheaper than tpf and t. One accident which you have to pay for yourself might wipe out a lifetime of saving on the premiums by only having tpf and t. I like to play safe ~ good quality comprehensive (not all comprehensive policies give the same quality of cover) plus protected NCD, with a company that doesn't penalise you at the next renewal if you happen to make a claim.
--
L\'escargot.
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - Xileno {P}
Too right. When I worked in insurance, you were the type of customer we loved ;-)
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - pendulum
One accident
which you have to pay for yourself might wipe out a lifetime of saving on
the premiums by only having tpf and t.


Or it might not. I know someone with 40 years claim-free experience and he'd have saved thousands by going TPF&F over that time. Instead, every year he went fully comp and opted for protected no claims whenever he could. In hindsight he made the wrong decision.

I have done a lot of quotes and for me, fully comp always seems to be between £200 and £400 more expensive. I'm a young driver though.
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - L'escargot
Or it might not.


I had an occasion where it did. In about 1985 my 18-month old car was badly damaged whilst parked by the side of the road ~ it cost about half the value of the car to repair it and it took 11 weeks. That meant 11 weeks of hire car charges for which I had to pay. With the financial help of my insurer I tried to sue the other driver but for various reasons the costs became prohibitive and I had to give up. If I hadn't been comprehensively insured I would have been wiped out. At that time if the other driver didn't report the accident to their insurer (and he didn't) then their insurer wasn't liable. I gather that the rules have since changed.
--
L\'escargot.
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - Stuartli
>>Paper version only required if you go abroad; it details the cover available in several languages.>>

To add a rider about a topic in another thread, Zurich doesn't require notification that you are taking your vehicle into another EU country.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
What\'s for you won\'t pass you by
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - LHM
My guess is the popular perception that TPF&T and - in particular - TPO cover has been traditionally sought by higher-risk drivers.

In many cases, of course, the opposite could be held true. I am quite happy to drive an older car on the basis of, 'if I damage it by my own stupidity then that's my tough luck'. Fire and theft are pretty unlikely, so I'd be fine with TPO cover.

Despite ever-increasing attempts by insurance companies to grade driver risk, it seems odd that this doesn't apply in this case.
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - ziggy
Whatever happened to 'road traffic act' insurance, AFAIR the absolute legal minimum.

Also AFAIR some insurers wont even offer TPF&T cover if value of car is too high (was 3000 grand).

Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - Falkirk Bairn
Whatever happened to 'road traffic act' insurance AFAIR the absolute legal minimum.


You are showing your age - Road Traffic Act" (damage to people and not property) was abandoned umpteen canteen years ago - say 30+yrs
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - L'escargot
Also AFAIR some insurers wont even offer TPF&T cover if value of car is too
high (was 3000 grand).


3000 grand? That is high!
--
L\'escargot.
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - doctorchris
Don't forget to add your Mam to the cover cos for you bairns this drops the premiums even further in my experience.
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - Falkirk Bairn
Don't forget to add your Mam to the cover cos for you bairns this drops
the premiums even further in my experience.


Dr Chris
I must explain all people born in Falkirk are "Falkirk Bairns" - whether you are 2 or 102 it makes no difference - I am 60+.

The local Football Team are also known as the Bairns - when they lose the papers up here are full of Sharp Lesson for the Bairns, Good Spanking for the Bairns etc etc
Comp can be cheaper than TPF&T - expat
I usually go for fully comp until the value of the car drops to such a level that I could afford to replace it myself without insurance. At that point it doesn't seem worthwhile to insure comp. Going to 3rd party only usually results in a very large drop in the premium. Mind you I am in Australia and things are no doubt different in the UK.