BT-how to decide - concrete

Having a bit of tussle with BT. We had a lightning strike on a neighbours property. It tripped out the main trip on the consumer units in 3 properties either side. The property struck, lost the CH boiler, microwave, kettle, toaster and TV as well as the telephone and router. The adjacent properties including ours lost our telephones and routers. The trips were reset and we regained power, but our telephone and router were not working. I called out BT and they came out 4 days later and said the telephone line was working but the phone and router weren't. They sent me a new router, but I had to buy a new telephone. Ther are now trying to charge me £130 for a callout charge because it was my equipment that was faulty. I have told them I will not pay. My argument is the damage sustained was to the phone and router. The only two items connected to the telephone line. Every other appliance connected to the mains was fine, including our TV which was on at the time. Therefore the damage was only caused by being connected to the telephone line, hence down to BT to prevent or mitigate this sort of occurance. If there was a mains electrical surge, why only the telephone and router damage and not the TV and other appliances? The router was also not faulty but damaged by a force from outside, probably through the telephone line. I know there may be some specialist engineers on the forum and would like some advice please. if it is down to an 'Act of God' then fair enough I will cough up. Otherwise I think BT should shoulder this one.

Cheers Concrete

BT-how to decide - bathtub tom

I think you'll find your telephone service provider only take responsibility up to the first or major socket, after that it's up to you.

I suggest the electrical 'spike' that damaged your 'phone and router, came down your 'phone line, not the power line. Telephone service providers do not (in my experience) fit surge protection to customers lines, although they do in telephone exchanges.

If the surge had come down the power line, damaging electrical equipment, would you have held your energy supplier responsible?

On the odd occasion I've had a problem with my telephone line, I've connected a wired 'phone to my master socket and disconnected everything else. If the fault persists, then it's down to my telephone service provider. If the fault disappears, then I know it's down to me.

BT-how to decide - concrete

That is my point tom. The power surge must have come down the telephone line, therefore it eminated within the BT network. Engineer charges are only applicable when your own equipment. ie telephone is faulty but the line is good. My equipment was perfectly fine until the surge down the BT line. This damaged the phone and router, they were not faulty until after the surge. I am not really convinced this call out charge is down to me in this case.

Cheers Concrete

BT-how to decide - RobJP

Just as you can choose whether or not to fit surge protection to your electrical appliances, you can fit surge protection to your phone line

You fail to do so, your fault. Nobody else's. I suggest you either foot the bill yourself, or else make a claim on your household contents policy.

BT-how to decide - concrete

Just as you can choose whether or not to fit surge protection to your electrical appliances, you can fit surge protection to your phone line

You fail to do so, your fault. Nobody else's. I suggest you either foot the bill yourself, or else make a claim on your household contents policy.

I am unaware there is a regular problem with power suges down the telephone line. If this is a regular occurance should not BT at least advise some sort of protection? I have a filter on one socket for internet use, but that is it. I have been through my contract with BT, word by word and no mention of surge protection anywhere. Not one. I don't mind footing the bill if it can be shown I neglected some reasonable care provision. However the fact remains that the surge came down a BT line from their network and damaged my telephone and their router. Without the benefit of advice from BT about possible power surges, exactly how do I fail in my duty to take reasonable care?

My neighbour, who is an IT boffin made a cogent observation. He switched on the damaged router and it turns on, cycles and then settles down with the blue light on as if ready for operation. However if an attempt to connect to the internet is made the light turns orange and a malfunction symbol appears. This proves the router was damaged through the telephone line and not the power circuits.

I simply don't see how BT can expect to charge for an engineer visit given their own terms and conditions. These clearly state that if any equipment owned by me is faulty then the visit is chargeable. My telephone was not faulty nor was the BT router until the power surge. The router is BT equipment and they did not see fit to install any sort of power surge protection on their own equipment. QED.

Concrete

BT-how to decide - daveyjp

Refuse to pay, advise the payment is in dispute and go through BT formal complaints procedure.

BT-how to decide - gordonbennet

Isn't a lightning strike the sort of random thing that we pay insurance for.

A few years ago we had no surge protection, i hadn't ever thought about it, lightning strike close by caused lots of electrical damage, and we lost about £2000 worth of electrical equipment, which the insurer covered without any issues, by the time i contacted the local NFU office they already knew all about it, our claim was minor compared to a business down the road which took the main strike.

What was interesting was Sony and Panasonic items were unaffected, other makes were rendered useless.

BT-how to decide - concrete

Isn't a lightning strike the sort of random thing that we pay insurance for.

A few years ago we had no surge protection, i hadn't ever thought about it, lightning strike close by caused lots of electrical damage, and we lost about £2000 worth of electrical equipment, which the insurer covered without any issues, by the time i contacted the local NFU office they already knew all about it, our claim was minor compared to a business down the road which took the main strike.

What was interesting was Sony and Panasonic items were unaffected, other makes were rendered useless.

I am asuming it was the lightning strike. We did not lose any electrical items, some of which were in use at the time. Only two items connected to the telephone line. I am now of a mind to fit surge protection to the telephone and router. I am contacting BT to see if they will provide or sell such protection. Totally unaware of surges through the telephone line until now. I have replaced the telephone system at my cost and that I accept. I think an engineers visit to check the line and connections after such an event is reasonable and should be made without charge in my view. It gives peace of mind all round that the system is safe and operating correctly.

Cheers Concrete

BT-how to decide - FP

I have been aware of the possibilty of damage to telephone equipment from lightning for some time now - not that I have done anything about it.

I thought it was also possible for lightning to damage TV equipment if connected to a roof aerial. No idea if surge protection is available for that.

Edited by FP on 07/06/2018 at 17:11

BT-how to decide - concrete

I have been aware of the possibilty of damage to telephone equipment from lightning for some time now - not that I have done anything about it.

I thought it was also possible for lightning to damage TV equipment if connected to a roof aerial. No idea if surge protection is available for that.

I think modern TV sets do have some protection, but a direct strike on the ariel would be a disaster anyway I should think. The stike on a neighbouring property tripped our main circuit breaker but was easily re-set. Out TV and router were working at the time and plugged into mains, no problem. The telephone was also plugged into mains for the answering machine. Again no problem. The phone and router were damaged by a aurge down the telephone line. I have no idea yet it that is avoidable, BT have not answered my enquiry yet. I suppose Maplins or RS online might offer some guidance. I am looking into it too.

Cheers Concrete

BT-how to decide - RobJP

A simple google search for 'phone socket surge protection' will give you all the information you need.

Absolutely any metal cable can be a lightning conductor. Your TV aerial. A Sky box. Overhead electric lines. A phone line.

You don't get advised about surge protecting your TV from the aerial or sky box being hit by lightning, same as you don't get advised the same for your phone equipment. Mainly because the likelyhood of such a strike is minimal.

Do you have a lightning rod on your house, like large commercial buildings do ? Or, like 99.9% of UK residences, do you just insure against the risk and leave it at that ?

BT-how to decide - concrete

Thanks Rob. I don't have a lightning conductor, never really thought about it. My poor neighbour took the brunt. She is about 80 and was actually thrown across the room by the strike. In view of the cost it may be better to rely on insurance.

BT saw it my way after all. They accepted that the only two items damaged were damaged because they were the ones connected to the telephone line. So the engineers call is put down to identifyinf a problem and safety check. The telephone handsets are down to me.

Cheers Concrete

BT-how to decide - Falkirk Bairn

A son was hit with lightning strike - took out Sky completely, phones, wifi, cabling to sky box & LNB.

Sky replaced LNB, all cables, Sky box etc - wifi box was with BT but we just used an old box in the interim & he swapped to Sky for BB. The indifferent service from BT, a price rise made him change.

Not so lucky was this chap:

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-444271...6

House will be demolished in owners opinion - fire engufed the roof & the fire brigade drown the house with water - wooden farmed building with a brick skin are very vulnerable to fires & water damage.