yes but its still on data base as a fail,
need to put car in for a pre- mot test before the officilal test
yet more money!!
I don't see the problem in an MOT fail appearing on the database - sometimes failure cannot be spotted during previous services/MOTs or on the road during the year, and as long as they've been rectified, there's no issue. Older cars will, inevitably (unless you spend a small fortune on maintenance) go wrong from time to time, parts will fail.
That said, where faults are listed over more than one year, or that SHOULD be obvious to owners (e.g. serious tyre, light or windscreen wiper defects) which then fail rightly point to an owner who, for whatever reason, cannot be bothered to effectively maintain their car. Again, I see no problem in this information being made available to potential buyers.
Before the recession and the introduction of fully computerised MOTs (during the manufacturers' UK 'good times' when prices of cars were still high compared to the rest of Europe [up to late 90s/early 2000s]), my old Nissan Micra's local main dealer always did a pre-MOT inspection during the service (I always have them done at the same time for this reason), so that any issues could be found and remedied before the car was MOTed following its service.
Sadly, with the introdution of the computerised, 'automated' MOT and latterly with tighter margins at dealerships, this could no longer be done, and lo and behold the car failed an MOT. I knew then it was time to part company with the car (too many expensive issues worth fixing compared to its worth, especially as one was structural). Amazingly, after PXing it (I told the truth about everything), it was sold on and stayed on the road for about 3-4 years.
|