There seems to be a lot of criticism of NextBase battery life and I'm very surprised that the company hasn't, it seems, successfully addressed this issue. I'm considering getting a dash-cam and the amount of negativity which surrounds this problem is a bit perplexing.
On one hand we have the journos extolling NextBase's virtue across their entire model range, on the other, there seem to be buyers who have had less than a satisfactory experience.
What I fail to understand in all of this, is that repeated incidences of the same fault could (and should) be construed as an inherent defect plus the fact that that would probably make individual units unfit for purpose so why hasn't anyone bought this up and mentioned The Consumer Rights Act? (The latest incarnation of the Sale of Goods Act) If I bought a product that had failed due to a relatively well documented problem then it would be returned for a refund or a new unit as inherent defects are not subject to the limitations of a 12 month guarantee.
The location of a dash-cam is going to be in the windscreen, in the sun. We all know how hot a vehicle's interior gets after even after just a short period of time when, in summer, there is hot sunshine. I'm wondering how NextBase's cameras fare in Australia or even southern Spain. I have many NiMh rechargeable batteries which are more than three years old and the premature failure rate is minimal. Lithium based batteries have, by and large, been proved to be superior and lithium iron (Li/Fe) is the most common type of consumer battery. I suspect that the lithium cells used here are the cheaper Li/MnO2 which not as robust.
Currently there are 187 1star reviews for one of the models (302G?) and I'm genuinely surprised at this.
|