HJB : your reply to skidpan's post was rather rude. Not really required.
Just because someone says something you don't agree with, doesn't mean they are wrong. The simple fact is that a lot of manufacturers WILL use that sort of reasoning to invalidate any 'goodwill' that might otherwise have been forthcoming.
We get plenty of people on here who post about problems, and then bite the head off anyone who replies and doesn't agree with their pre-conceived ideas about how it will all pan out. Basically, they'd come on here for validation of their genius, and anyone who points out any flaws in that plan is viewed as an idiot, butting in, being 'unhelpful', etc.
As it is, I tend to agree with skidpan. Yes, there is a known problem with these engines, and a lot of them use a lot of oil. However, by skimping on the servicing costs you have given them an open door to refusing/restricting any goodwill. If I was you, I'd be prepared for them to make a small-ish offer as to the percentage of costs to fix, and also getting some prices off independent engine rebuilders to get the work done.
So is that 'an opinion' (which you don't want), or 'advice' (which you do want) ? Only you can decide ...
|