Unsupported conspiracy theory
Really ?
First off, describing anything as a 'conspiracy theory' basically says to the world 'I've lost the argument, and since I've not got a valid point to make against it, and since everyone is against me, I'm going to put all those people who are against me into the same 'nutjob' pile as the JFK/Roswell lot.'
Real good way to go.
Got some news for you. Einstein's theory of relativity. Ever heard of it ? It's still a theory. As in, it has (so far) been impossibly to prove - though it's also been impossible to disprove too. All we have is a theory. And yes, we can't PROVE it as yet.
BUT ... what we do have is a large amount of observational evidence.
For starters, HJ himself. 40+ years in the motor trade. His THEORY is that these extended oil changes are terrible for engine longevity.
Then, dozens of independent garages - notably including ones who specialise in the marques that do a lot of longlife oil changes - BMW, Audi, Merc. Go on, pick up the phone. Call one of them, and ask what oil change interval they recommend. Ask why. Again, what they tell you is only a THEORY.
Then, the experience of people who've worked in oil formulation (me, for example). I'll tell you now, clear as day. Engine oil (especially so for diesels, due to the acidic combustion products) that has done 15k or more is basically worn out. That's a THEORY.
But, in spite of the fact that we can't prove our theory, it's backed up by observational evidence.
Want a conspiracy theory ? I'll give you one. You work for BMW/Audi/Merc/an engine rebuilders, in their new engines dept. If people start changing oil more frequently, you'll be out of a job.
That, or you're in fleet marketing, and are scared of prices going through the floor on cars that have done 60-80k on 2 or 3 oil changes.
|