A sensible EU move at last? - unthrottled

www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-23152918

Heartily approve. Now get rid of the silly 56mph speed limit and the job's a good 'un.

A sensible EU move at last? - RT

An increase the 40mph limit for trucks on single carriagways not subject to a lower limit.

A sensible EU move at last? - jamie745

Whether the EU makes a good or bad move, it doesn't change the fact we could've done it ourselves and saved £53million a day.

A sensible EU move at last? - MrDanno

If cylists actually took notice of the indicators on the side of trucks waiting to turn left at traffic lights, Then that would reduce the number of fatalities and injuries every year by a huge amount.

I must say that truck does look nice though.

A sensible EU move at last? - jamie745

Well, quite. A lorry is hardly something which just leaps out of nowhere. Cyclists who merrily go up the foot-wide path between pavement and lorry at junctions, blindly assuming they'll be seen are beyond stupid.

A sensible EU move at last? - Bromptonaut

If cylists actually took notice of the indicators on the side of trucks waiting to turn left at traffic lights, Then that would reduce the number of fatalities and injuries every year by a huge amount..

But that's not actually what's happening in many of these cases.

Instead the truck either turns across the cyclist or passes ignoring fact that rear of vehicle (in London fatalities it's nearly always a construction tip/skip truck) will run tighter than front.

Too many of the drivers are simply not up to the task. Google the name Dennis p*** - perhaps the most egregious example but he is by no means alone.

A sensible EU move at last? - gordonbennet

If cylists actually took notice of the indicators on the side of trucks waiting to turn left at traffic lights, Then that would reduce the number of fatalities and injuries every year by a huge amount..

But that's not actually what's happening in many of these cases.

Instead the truck either turns across the cyclist or passes ignoring fact that rear of vehicle (in London fatalities it's nearly always a construction tip/skip truck) will run tighter than front.

Too many of the drivers are simply not up to the task. Google the name Dennis p*** - perhaps the most egregious example but he is by no means alone.

The strange thing is that a professional drivers accident history is not officially recorded and any prospective employer has no way of knowing the standard of driver they are employing, i've always thought that accident history should be reportable and then available (linked to pro drivers digi card) to parties with justified interest.

This should apply to all people employed as drivers, whatever type of vehicle they control including cars, that way poor drivers become unemployable as they should be and those who pay peanuts to employ those monkeys lose out as uninsurable, win win all round.

You'd think that the bigger/better (not always the same) employers would allow trusted long term professionals to sit in on interviews too, but no instead interviews are often conducted by those who wouldn't know a real lorry driver from a bar of soap, and some driving assessments* are often little more than box ticking exercises where ironically some of the finest real drivers fail miserably and incompetent half wits pass with flying colours.

*where i work there is no box ticking, the assessments are completely (and rightly) based on driving and vehicle handling ability, as they should be.

All this needs international agreement (and equal standards of ability for test pass), otherwise people move countries to lose their history as ever was the case.

A sensible EU move at last? - dan86

WHERE I currently work even tho I passed the interview I hsd to habe a strict driving examination plus every one has a 6 month probation where everything is looked at whem you have ypur 6 month review. Also if you are involved in a incident ypu are pulld in and interviewed by transport management and taken back out on an assessment whether you are at fault or not.

A sensible EU move at last? - gordonbennet

That sounds fair Dan.

Some of this assessment stuff needs tempering with a bit of good old fashioned common sense.

Friend of mine is (good old school) driver trainer, following an accident some years ago where one idiot had overtaken another lorry on a blind bend, when the inevitable vehicle came the other way the overtaker simply pushed the overtakee into the ditch.

Management asked my mate to assess the driver at fault...his retort was to ask them ''whats to assess, should we practice overtaking on blind bends till we eventually get it right''? it was obviously to ensure the sacking was legit, but for goodness sake has common sense flown the nest?

Another assessor i still know from 30 years back concentrates on box ticking, happy to fail very capable drivers of umpteen years provable track record because they failed to check some tiny irrelevant box on the check sheet yet had thoroughly competent drives in complete control of the vehicle at all times, you really couldn't make it up.

A sensible EU move at last? - MrDanno

the days of companies asking for a minimum of 2 years checkable commercial driving experience is long gone. Now all they want is for someone to get the vehicle from A to B at the cheapest possible costs.

I know of a driving assesor who was pulled in the office and asked why he had failed all of the applicants, Apparently the fact their driving had not met the standard required was not a good enough reason for him to fail them. Which begs the question, Why are they doing driving assesments if they are not allowed to fail unsuitable applicants..

The same firms monthly vehicle damage cost increased by 10 times what it used to be with these drivers, Companies these days don't seem to care who they have driving for them, As long as they will work for the minimum wage.

The problem is in this country, HGV drivers are not classed as professionals, They are just to most "some numpty lorry driver" and I doubt it will change anytime soon.

A sensible EU move at last? - Bromptonaut

Too many of the drivers are simply not up to the task. Google the name Dennis p*** - perhaps the most egregious example but he is by no means alone.

Don't know why the swear filter took umbrage at surname p***. There's a link here to his history and killing of Catriona Patel tinyurl.com/7bwpb59 (link to Daily Mail).

A sensible EU move at last? - Avant

I don't know why either. It should work if we put spaces in - P u t z. Let's hope this individual is still in jail.

A sensible EU move at last? - Bromptonaut

If cylists actually took notice of the indicators on the side of trucks waiting to turn left at traffic lights, Then that would reduce the number of fatalities and injuries every year by a huge amount.

If only you could rely on truckers using the indicators.

Arrived at junction of Melton St with Euston Road around 09:30 this morning. Third vehicle back from lights was a long fixed wheelbase flatbed; a contractors vehicle used for shifting small/medium plant between sites. No indicator so presumably going straight ahead. Could have tried to pass him nearside to access the cycle box at lights but didn't as I'd not seen them go red so uncertain how long before they changed again - sequence gives well over 30secs red while Euston Rd and peds have greens.

Waited behind only to see him, still no indicator, turn left. Same again with an extra LWB VW Crafter at Russell Sq.

A sensible EU move at last? - gordonbennet

If only you could rely on truckers using the indicators.

Bromp the ones you mention are not and never will be lorry drivers as long as they have a certain orifice, and its nothing to do with training, the employer has bought cheaply exactly what they paid for.

Indicators are all, the drivers responsibility does not end there, things such as setting up mirrors correctly keeping them and windows clean and last but not least using them correctly and actually controlling the vehicle not just attending the wheel.

Your post is telling though, you used your loaf, you saw the archtypical potential poorly driven lorry and kept yourself out of harms way as you (rightly) suspected it was driven by a chimp, and you lived to tell the tale.

Now i'm not saying it's your responsibility to drive these idiots vehicles for them, but then neither is it the good lorry drivers fault if some fool with a death wish insists on putting themselves repetitively or seemingly deliberately in the line of fire (and some do this continually, often the ones with video cameras attached to their helmets) despite the good drivers best efforts to protect idiot cyclists from themselves.

If a crunch comes the half wit at the wheel of the lorry walks away and nothing will ever change that imbalance.

A sensible EU move at last? - Bromptonaut

Bromp the ones you mention are not and never will be lorry drivers as long as they have a certain orifice, and its nothing to do with training, the employer has bought cheaply exactly what they paid for.

Not seen that expression for a long time. First and last time was about 20 years ago; somebody at work saying X would never be a cashier as long as he had a hole in his bum!

A sensible EU move at last? - MrDanno

Bromptonaut, Have you ever heard the saying "two wrongs don't make a right?"

well, In the on the road conflicts between a cyclist and a truck, two wrongs make a dead or injured cyclist.

Luckily you seem to be a diligent cyclist and you recognised the dangers of travelling up the inside of a truck and your still alive and well to tell that tale but, Many cyclists like Gordon Bennet has pointed out, They seem to leave their brain behind when they strap on that helmet cam.

As I often say, It is very easy to see the faults of other while completely ignoring our own.

I could tell many a tale of the cyclists I have come across in my time as a HGV driver and even when using indicators they still ride up the side at red lights and then sit in your blind spot where you can't see them. For a good HGV driver this is not soo much of a problem as they will be scanning that nearside mirror constantly while waiting for a green and will have seen that cyclist before they get into the blind spot and will know they are there but, For the chimps (as Gordon bennet called them) They won't be looking.

One company I worked for used to take a full size artic and a bicycle out to town centres and invite cyclists to sit in the driving seat and see just how it is for the driver to see the cyclist and where the blindspot is.

Before you brand all lorry drivers as incompetent, Remember we are not all the same.

A sensible EU move at last? - Bromptonaut

@Mr Danno,

My interest, as a daily commuter is in the spate of cyclist deaths in London under the wheels of skip/tip and other construction vehicles. I did not brand all other lorry drivers incompetent but recorded that I'd met on of dubious competence this morning.

There is a point of view, implicit in your 15:34 Saturday post, that these collisions are wholly/mainly the result of cyclists ignoring indicators and other cues. I dispute that and suspect a significant proportion, more than indicated by convictions, are down to drivers. Probably those GB decribes as chimps, including P u t z and Joao Correia-Lopes, the driver who killed Elidh Cairns on her bike in Notting Hill and susequently a pedestrian in Marylebone, but nonethless in charge of large vehicles in London.

If the events logged meticulously by Olaf Storbeck http://tinyurl.com/cuta43p were all down to recklessness by bike riders it'd be testosterone soaked young men dying. The victims of tippers and cement mixers are often young, female and non British.

Of course there's a need to train cyclists, focussing particularly on each years new intake of students and junior office staff. Road design too has its part; too many cycle lanes lead one straight into danger.

Rules of engagement with trucks are never go up nearside unless (a) you know it cannot move eg stopped in jam or for lights and (b) you have an escape route onto the pavement in case your judgement of (a) was wrong.

In my example this morning (a) was not met as I didn't see lights go red so no clue as to how long before green came up again.

Edited by Bromptonaut on 16/09/2013 at 14:33

A sensible EU move at last? - Bromptonaut

Rules of engagement with trucks are never go up nearside unless (a) you know it cannot move eg stopped in jam or for lights and (b) you have an escape route onto the pavement in case your judgement of (a) was wrong.

In my example this morning (a) was not met as I didn't see lights go red so no clue as to how long before green came up again.

Why did I want to get to box at front rather than wait? At this particular junction at least 25% of left turners of all vehicular types but mainly taxis out of Euston fail to indicate.

Then, when lights change, they cannot turn into Euston Rd for several seconds because of box junction restriction. Those wanting to go straight on are left either fuming behind the stopped or having to join moving line in outside lane.

A sensible EU move at last? - Pondlife
I could tell many a tale of the cyclists I have come across in my time as a HGV driver and even when using indicators they still ride up the side at red lights and then sit in your blind spot where you can't see them. For a good HGV driver this is not soo much of a problem as they will be scanning that nearside mirror constantly while waiting for a green and will have seen that cyclist before they get into the blind spot and will know they are there

I'm often worried about cyclists when I drive in London, and I'm only in a car (albeit a fairly big one). I can only imagine the worries of a lorry driver in the same environment.

I actually have less of a worry with those cyclists who ride in the middle of the road: they may be doing the wrong thing (wrong side of road, going slower than traffic on left etc), but at least you can see them. Not saying that riding in the middle is a good thing, but just that I can understand why some do it.

The other thing I worry about is skip lorries. They seem to drive like cars, and sometimes go faster than I would. They must have massive engines, and hopefully very good brakes.

A sensible EU move at last? - Bromptonaut

I actually have less of a worry with those cyclists who ride in the middle of the road: they may be doing the wrong thing (wrong side of road, going slower than traffic on left etc), but at least you can see them. Not saying that riding in the middle is a good thing, but just that I can understand why some do it.

That's actually what modern training tells you to do. Ride well out from kerb where motor drivers can see you.

Too close in and you're vulnerable to multiple risks including

  • Dropping out of vision of cars approaching from behind as their focus is directly ahead - risk of close passing or 'left hooking'
  • not being seen by drivers emerging from sideroads
  • Not being seen by pedestrians who then step in road
  • Stuff in the gutter (broken glass and other detritus
  • Degraded surface in the gutter
  • Slippy thermoplastic paint in the gutter
  • Wheel trap drains in the gutter
  • Too close to parked cars (risk form opening doors).

A sensible EU move at last? - Ben 10

Just have to criticise cyclists on here and a certain person is straight on defending their actions to the hilt. He will not listen to any negative points about them and will act like a dog with a bone. Those new on here are warned. He is spoiling for a tussle on the motorists opinions about cyclists. Right or wrong. The same arguments from him over and over. He never concedes that cyclists are to blame for many issues on the road. And wont listen to negative views.

In my book they deserve what that get, if they are too thick to read the road properly. They think they are above the law. They think they should ride about without personal protection.No official road test. In dark clothing and no lights. And they moan ALL the time about drivers. Yet as a cyclist they do not pay tax, insurance or think they should. They are below caravaners, white van drivers and cabbies on the road food chain of irritance and annoyance. I have no time for their constant whinging about how hard done by they are. "The roads are too narrow, unsafe or busy". Well maybe the fact is that they are for motorised vehicles.

I wish cyclists were banned from the road. They ARE the hazard. Yet they don't want to admit it. Everyone else apart from them is the problem.

Wait for it....................The pin is out................Throws grenade.............Here he comes...........................;-) Can't resist can you.

A sensible EU move at last? - dan86

Not all cyclists are bad but there ate many that do stupid things that to be honest they deserve it when it goes wrong for them.

A sensible EU move at last? - Pondlife

Sorry, I can't agree with cyclists "deserving it", when the consequences are sometimes life-changing and occasionally fatal.

Yes, they often deserve admonishment, and I'd support better enforcement and fining. But noone deserves serious injury for inconveniencing or annoying others.

Yes, I've been annoyed by cyclists. And sometimes I've been pretty angry - in the "I could have b***** killed you" way - but I'd never wish serious injury on any of them.

A sensible EU move at last? - Bromptonaut

@ Ben 10

Whatever.

You may like to re-read what I've said in this thread but hey ho, if you've got the image I'm a lycra warrior you'll mever recognise me in real life.

Which is probably a bonus.

Edited by Bromptonaut on 16/09/2013 at 21:54

A sensible EU move at last? - Avant

I think this thread has delighted us enough.