Another thing is we presently have a ?1.5? litre engine on the Civic which we have been told has ?Turbo?.
I was confused when you said you'd had your Civic for 20 years and it was a 1.5 (because there was no 1.5 option on a 20 year old Civic), but then I thought it must have been bought used rather than new. In that case, it would be the one that shared a lot with the Rover 400/45, which did have a 1.5 option. But unless the car is a diesel, it definitely doesn't have a turbo.
As well as what has already been mentioned, I'd put forward the Mazda 2, but this would be on the assumption that the lack of rear seat space wouldn't be a problem. Very reliable and well built wee cars. They all use a 1.5 engine, but this comes in a few different power outputs, 75, 90, 105 and 115bhp.
I'd also suggest a Skoda Fabia 1.0TSI. This is a turbo, and while it may not actually be that much (If any) faster outright than a non turbo equivalent (in terms of power), it will feel faster and more muscular due to the torque provided by the turbo, which in turn will make it a more relaxing thing to drive. There are two power outputs at the budget you'd be looking at, 95 or 110bhp. The lower powered car would be fine for most, but (I believe) the higher powered version comes with a 6 speed gearbox as standard, which (along with the torque) would make for more relaxed motorway cruising. There are a few other VAG cars based on the same platform and running gear, Audi A1, Seat Ibiza and of course the VW Polo, but the Fabia is probably the sweet spot in terms of value, space and comfort.
One other suggestion (which applies to anything you may consider) is to avoid sporty or high spec trim levels using larger diameter alloy wheels on low profile tyres. These invariably have a detrimental effect on the ride comfort, are more prone to being damaged by potholes or kerbing, will cost more to replace, create more road noise and worse economy (albeit not necessarily by much).
Edited by badbusdriver on 06/06/2025 at 21:29
|