Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - argybargy

Evening all

Regular users of this forum will have noticed that every now and again I ask about a replacement for my trusted 2013 Honda Jazz. Its now 7 years since she arrived, and annual servicing along with a proactive attitude to MOT advisories and the sheer reliability of the brand have combined to ensure trouble free motoring. Just recently I drove 200 miles each way from North Wales to Somerset, and not a beat missed. However, she is getting a bit long in the tooth.

I asked a while ago about replacements and mentioned the Nissan Juke. I was told in no uncertain terms to leave well alone, and flagged instead towards the no doubt excellent Mazda CX3 and its slightly bigger sibling, the CX30. Still thinking along those lines, and I now have the money in the bank to do something decisive.

Question this time, however, is about the Nissan Qashqai. There are loads about, and I really like the look of them. But that's all I know about the model at this point in time: how they look, although I did note that according to HJ reviews, the 2021 version improves significantly on what came before. Is the Qashqai a viable alternative to the CX3/ CX30, or not?

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - Adampr

Well, let's just say I'd look at the alternatives from Mazda, Honda, Toyota, Suzuki, Kia and Hyundai first.

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - Orb>>.

Brother in law had several on Motability and was always happy but he didn't have to worry about reliability. Last one was a 2021 petrol auto. As Adam says look at the alternatives first.

Budget ? age ? fuel? auto or manual? leccy?

Edited by Orb>>. on 25/05/2025 at 18:22

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - Bromptonaut

Looked vaguely at a 'Squashie' to replace our Berlingo and pull a 1400kg caravan.

It failed some criteria or another but I can't remember which one.

Ended up with a Skoda Superb but now we're in different categories of vehicle.

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - gordonbennet

A colleague just replaced his 3 year leased QQ with another, the one that went back never gave him a moments trouble and covered a decent mileage economically, hence the replacement.

Presumably you arn't talking brand new, so length of warranty will be important to you, where Toyota wins hands down so long as you get it serviced at the dealer for another year's warranty up to 10 years.

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - Steveieb

I commend you for thinking about a Nissan as this model is built in the Uk so supporting British workers but if it’s true it has Renault underpinnings I would think twice ?

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - SLO76
As much as I’d like to say “buy British” the Nissan is sadly nothing more than an uglier, heavier rebadged Renault Megane. Reliability is no better than you’d find with said French brand either. Fine if buying new and offloading before the warranty is up, less so if you plan on longterm ownership.

The Mazda’s already mentioned are good news, ditto any petrol Toyota or possibly a Kia, which will have the remainder of its original 7yr warranty if you find one with a full main dealer history.

The Honda HRV is a bit dated but the 1.5 non-turbocharged petrol is reliable and they’re surprisingly spacious. We ran a diesel for a while and suffered no issues at all.
Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - argybargy

Thanks, all. Perhaps not a sufficient number of gushing plaudits for the Qashqai to justify moving my sights away from Mazda.

Budget not much more than 13k, auto would be nice but not essential, I'd prefer petrol or maybe even a hybrid but not attracted to diesel. Can't remember what else was asked, so I'll have to post, check back and edit...ah. Age wise, preferably no more than 5 years old

Edited by argybargy on 25/05/2025 at 21:29

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - badbusdriver

Question this time, however, is about the Nissan Qashqai. There are loads about, and I really like the look of them. But that's all I know about the model at this point in time: how they look, although I did note that according to HJ reviews, the 2021 version improves significantly on what came before. Is the Qashqai a viable alternative to the CX3/ CX30, or not?

Thing is, even with the most (statistically) unreliable cars, you will always find folk who have had one with no issues, or know someone who has had one with no issues. One of my customers had a B-Max auto for nearly 10 years and had no problems with it!.

auto would be nice but not essential

Regarding auto, 1st, I had a look on Autotrader and while your budget will get into a CX30, there are no autos listed under £14k. As for an automatic Qashqai, I'm fairly certain one of these would have a DCT, i.e, same type of auto as your B-Max.

Another point regarding CX3/CX30, the CX3 is a completely different animal which, despite what the name implies, is actually based on the Mazda 2 rather than the 3. As such, while fine in the front and a decent boot volume (about the same as the Jazz), rear seat space is poor. They are decent wee cars otherwise, very reliable, and you definitely would get into an auto for your budget, but the youngest would be 2019. The CX30 is based on the Mazda 3, so while by no means the most spacious car of its type, is going to be fine for most.

But ultimately for me, between a CX30 and Qashqai, it would be the CX30 all day long. I seem to remember you being in the North Wales/Chester area, if that is the case, there is a CX30 on Autotrader not too far away in Whitechurch/Prees:

202505192569588

Dealer reviews very good at 4.9 out of 5 over 580 reviews.

I do also feel obliged to point out that the Honda Jazz (not including current model) is on of the most reliable cars available at any price. If you are keeping it serviced regular and treat the underside with something appropriate to keep rust at bay, there is no reason for it not to keep on proving reliable service for another decade.

But if you just want a change, fair do's!

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - argybargy

Question this time, however, is about the Nissan Qashqai. There are loads about, and I really like the look of them. But that's all I know about the model at this point in time: how they look, although I did note that according to HJ reviews, the 2021 version improves significantly on what came before. Is the Qashqai a viable alternative to the CX3/ CX30, or not?

Thing is, even with the most (statistically) unreliable cars, you will always find folk who have had one with no issues, or know someone who has had one with no issues. One of my customers had a B-Max auto for nearly 10 years and had no problems with it!.

auto would be nice but not essential

Regarding auto, 1st, I had a look on Autotrader and while your budget will get into a CX30, there are no autos listed under £14k. As for an automatic Qashqai, I'm fairly certain one of these would have a DCT, i.e, same type of auto as your B-Max.

Another point regarding CX3/CX30, the CX3 is a completely different animal which, despite what the name implies, is actually based on the Mazda 2 rather than the 3. As such, while fine in the front and a decent boot volume (about the same as the Jazz), rear seat space is poor. They are decent wee cars otherwise, very reliable, and you definitely would get into an auto for your budget, but the youngest would be 2019. The CX30 is based on the Mazda 3, so while by no means the most spacious car of its type, is going to be fine for most.

But ultimately for me, between a CX30 and Qashqai, it would be the CX30 all day long. I seem to remember you being in the North Wales/Chester area, if that is the case, there is a CX30 on Autotrader not too far away in Whitechurch/Prees:

202505192569588

Dealer reviews very good at 4.9 out of 5 over 580 reviews.

I do also feel obliged to point out that the Honda Jazz (not including current model) is on of the most reliable cars available at any price. If you are keeping it serviced regular and treat the underside with something appropriate to keep rust at bay, there is no reason for it not to keep on proving reliable service for another decade.

But if you just want a change, fair do's

Thanks as always, BBD, for your very helpful input, and for flagging up that CX30. My niece bought one a few months ago and she loves it, though she paid upwards of 17k, perhaps because she lives in London.

I would consider another Jazz, though the latest hybrid model looks to my eyes smaller than the Mk2 that I have at present, and "shrinking interior space" is not where I want to be. I briefly considered the Mk 3 Jazz Sport which Honda marketed with upwards of 120 bhp, but to my mind that sporty styling looks wrong on such a car. So the other Jazz option is the slightly bigger standard Mk3, which has a couple of extra BHP and (I think) a longer wheelbase.

Having said all the above and given your comments about the CX3 perhaps I might be better looking at the CX30 after all.

By the way, any chance of issuing a warning before mentioning the...gulp.... B-Max auto? 7 years after getting rid of that car I'm still partially traumatised by the experience....

Edited by argybargy on 26/05/2025 at 21:40

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - Big John

. Is the Qashqai a viable alternative to the CX3/ CX30, or not?

Nissan Qashqai basically has Renault oily bits and you'd receive similar advice as you did with the Juke.

I had a Mazda CX30 as a courtesy car a few months ago, In some respects I liked it especially the fact it had knobs and buttons including a large control that cold be used to control the infotainment etc. It also had a great heads up display. What I didn't like was the 2.0 skyactive petrol engine, personally I found it gutless, you had to really rev to find any power. It was also rather "bingy bongy" trying to alert you it was about to crash when you were simply passing a parked car or spotting a speed limit sign somewhere stage left in a factory site of 5mph and the car then bitterly complaining. This could be the case with many other cars, so a good long test drive of any car is important - things have change since 2013.

Personally I'm now hooked on cars with Toyota hybrid running gear - suits my driving style and the modern gubbins isn't so in your face. If your are coming from a Jazz how about looking at a Yaris Cross?

Or how about another Honda Jazz?

Edited by Big John on 26/05/2025 at 09:40

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - argybargy

. Is the Qashqai a viable alternative to the CX3/ CX30, or not?

Nissan Qashqai basically has Renault oily bits and you'd receive similar advice as you did with the Juke.

I had a Mazda CX30 as a courtesy car a few months ago, In some respects I liked it especially the fact it had knobs and buttons including a large control that cold be used to control the infotainment etc. It also had a great heads up display. What I didn't like was the 2.0 skyactive petrol engine, personally I found it gutless, you had to really rev to find any power. It was also rather "bingy bongy" trying to alert you it was about to crash when you were simply passing a parked car or spotting a speed limit sign somewhere stage left in a factory site of 5mph and the car then bitterly complaining. This could be the case with many other cars, so a good long test drive of any car is important - things have change since 2013.

Personally I'm now hooked on cars with Toyota hybrid running gear - suits my driving style and the modern gubbins isn't so in your face. If your are coming from a Jazz how about looking at a Yaris Cross?

Or how about another Honda Jazz?

Yes, as i said above ( and thanks for your comments about the CX30 courtesy car) I would consider another Jazz, though I was hoping for a bit more power without having to compromise on appearance. For now I'll keep a foot in both camps and focus on Mazda, meantime keeping my eye out for another Jazz, if the mileage and age is right.

Edited by argybargy on 26/05/2025 at 21:39

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - Big John

, though I was hoping for a bit more power without having to compromise on appearance. For now I'll keep a foot in both camps and focus on Mazda, meantime keeping my eye out for another Jazz, if the mileage and age is right.

Re power - consider the latest Honda Civic hybrid, rather lively to say the least (0-60 in 7.8 secs).

PS I think the CX30 courtesy car I drove would probably have been a more basic spec. There are much faster versions in the range.

Extensive test drives are essential to make sure you like the different approaches to modern drivetrains & gubbins. It can be a bit "Marmite" re liking or disliking. It took me ages, mind you as well as finding a car I really loved I also had the Yorkshire requirement re price!

Edited by Big John on 26/05/2025 at 22:08

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - Steveieb

When reliability and customer service are considered Honda have not done themselves any favours in their response to the brake compensator failures which often happen just out of warranty.

£3000 bill and a long wait for the part from Nissin.

My friend has changed his Civic for a new one to be sure he has a five year guarantee to cover this .But Honda s response to life long customers hasn’t been encouraging.

Mazda has not suffered from any such failures so unless anyone else has evidence I guess they are a safer bet when faced with manufacturing faults . Also I don’t believe they have tried the wet belt technology like Honda ?

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - Chris M

"Mazda has not suffered from any such failures so unless anyone else has evidence I guess they are a safer bet when faced with manufacturing faults."

Didn't do very well with owners of their diesels though did they.

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - gordonbennet

"Mazda has not suffered from any such failures so unless anyone else has evidence I guess they are a safer bet when faced with manufacturing faults."

Didn't do very well with owners of their diesels though did they.

Quite

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - argybargy

When reliability and customer service are considered Honda have not done themselves any favours in their response to the brake compensator failures which often happen just out of warranty.

£3000 bill and a long wait for the part from Nissin.

My friend has changed his Civic for a new one to be sure he has a five year guarantee to cover this .But Honda s response to life long customers hasn’t been encouraging.

Mazda has not suffered from any such failures so unless anyone else has evidence I guess they are a safer bet when faced with manufacturing faults . Also I don’t believe they have tried the wet belt technology like Honda ?

Disappointing to hear about that. I've had no interaction with main dealers since buying this car except for the purchase of small items which aren't available elsewhere. The only weakness of the Mk2 Jazz that I know of is the rear brake calipers, and they're a straight replacement. I didn't know about the problems you mention, which presumably affect newer cars and other models.

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - skidpan

Re power - consider the latest Honda Civic hybrid, rather lively to say the least (0-60 in 7.8 secs).

0-60 for the latest Jazz is 9.7 seconds, same as the Yaris. The Yaris feels very lively but the difference between it and the Superb IV (a 7.4 second car) is huge. But we can forget 0-60 times, only useful for willey waving down the pub.

We looked very briefly at the Jazz and were very disapointed. The packaging was poor. The boot was tiny with no space for a spare and whilst the rear legroom was good it was only there because the front seats would not go back far enough for a 5' 9" male to be comfortable behind the wheel.

The Yaris boot measured bigger with my tape and had a standard space saver under the floor. With the drivers seat set for me there was space for me in the back. Trim materials were better as well.

It was also £4000 less with a good PCP.

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - argybargy

Re power - consider the latest Honda Civic hybrid, rather lively to say the least (0-60 in 7.8 secs).

0-60 for the latest Jazz is 9.7 seconds, same as the Yaris. The Yaris feels very lively but the difference between it and the Superb IV (a 7.4 second car) is huge. But we can forget 0-60 times, only useful for willey waving down the pub.

We looked very briefly at the Jazz and were very disapointed. The packaging was poor. The boot was tiny with no space for a spare and whilst the rear legroom was good it was only there because the front seats would not go back far enough for a 5' 9" male to be comfortable behind the wheel.

The Yaris boot measured bigger with my tape and had a standard space saver under the floor. With the drivers seat set for me there was space for me in the back. Trim materials were better as well.

It was also £4000 less with a good PCP.

The boot is indeed small, but "horses for courses". Our Jazz is rarely required to transport more than two people, so rear legroom is irrelevant and at 5ft 8in I find the driver's seat positions perfectly, even if there's someone of a similar stature sitting behind me ( though admittedly their knees may be up against the back of my seat). The boot is borderline pathetic I agree, but the flexibility of the rear seats more than compensates. It only takes seconds to change the car into a small van, all assuming the seating in the newer Jazz works the same way.

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - argybargy

, though I was hoping for a bit more power without having to compromise on appearance. For now I'll keep a foot in both camps and focus on Mazda, meantime keeping my eye out for another Jazz, if the mileage and age is right.

Re power - consider the latest Honda Civic hybrid, rather lively to say the least (0-60 in 7.8 secs).

PS I think the CX30 courtesy car I drove would probably have been a more basic spec. There are much faster versions in the range.

Extensive test drives are essential to make sure you like the different approaches to modern drivetrains & gubbins. It can be a bit "Marmite" re liking or disliking. It took me ages, mind you as well as finding a car I really loved I also had the Yorkshire requirement re price!

Thanks again, and yes, there are definitely more powerful versions of the CX30. The advert that BBD linked to the other day was for a model with over 170bhp, which is perhaps a bit much for me after 7 years in a Jazz. Unlikely that in current circumstances I'll have time for extensive test drives, so I need to select from a small number of options. Mazda remains top of the list but I'm getting a notion that a newer Jazz might be a possibility also.

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - SLO76
My mother has a Mk III Jazz which replaced her Mk II. It’s a much nicer wee car all round in my opinion. It’s more spacious and it rides much better than the previous model. Engines are simple and there’s nothing complex to go wrong or scare off local garages from offering servicing and repairs. It’ll be much cheaper than the current hybrid models and the Mazda. They’re not so great for longer distance runs, but compared to what you have now they’re a step up.
Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - argybargy
My mother has a Mk III Jazz which replaced her Mk II. It’s a much nicer wee car all round in my opinion. It’s more spacious and it rides much better than the previous model. Engines are simple and there’s nothing complex to go wrong or scare off local garages from offering servicing and repairs. It’ll be much cheaper than the current hybrid models and the Mazda. They’re not so great for longer distance runs, but compared to what you have now they’re a step up.

Thanks again. I have taken this Mk2 Jazz on a couple of longish runs and its coped pretty well. It overtakes safely on country routes if you give yourself plenty of road, and keeps up on the motorways. Road noise can get a bit wearing and SWMBO often complains about the effect that the hardish suspension has on her back, but we cope. If the newer models are any better in that regard then that's definitely a bonus.

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - John F

.....trusted 2013 Honda Jazz. Its now 7 years since she arrived,.... she is getting a bit long in the tooth.

It's a machine. As construction workers and farmers know, hours of use, of which mileage is a rough guide, is more important than age. Assuming average annual mileage of c. 8000 and careful maintenance and corrosion prevention, a modern car should last at least 20yrs. As usual, the recommendations so far are the usual mainly Asian suspects. When we needed a replacement for our 19yr old Focus (which lasted another two years with our son) in 2019 we chose a last-of -the-line Mk1 Peugeot 2008 130 with EAT6 - a reliable user-friendly Aisin autobox. We would either choose the same again or consider a BYD EV and use our solar panels to charge it when the FIT contract runs out.

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - badbusdriver

Would you consider electric Argy?. If you were to say a £14k budget, there is a lot of tempting cars with a (quoted) range of 200+ miles out there as young as 2024...........

I briefly considered the Mk 3 Jazz Sport which Honda marketed with upwards of 120 bhp, but to my mind that sporty styling looks wrong on such a car. So the other Jazz option is the slightly bigger standard Mk3, which has a couple of extra BHP and (I think) a longer wheelbase.

Yeah its a shame Honda decided to only the 1.5 (130bhp) engine to the Jazz in sport trim, but even if that wasn't the case, it still wouldn't be everyone's cup of tea. With peak torque coming in at 4600rpm, it is very much a "traditional" Honda engine, i.e, needs a heavy right foot to get the best out of it!

We had a 3rd gen Jazz 1.3 with the CVT. Brilliant car in most respects and i didn't find its performance lacking (but then i was prepared to use the revs necessary to access what it could give!), not really a car for relaxed travel at the 70mph limit though. The peaky nature of the engine (peak torque was 5k rpm!) and the CVT's long legged ratios meant the least sign of a hill would send the revs flaring (dramatically so on a steeper hills) if you wanted to maintain the speed.

The car we had most recently was a Hyundai Bayon 1.0 turbo (120BHP) DCT. The engine on that was pretty much the polar opposite of the Jazz with plenty of torque at low revs (peak torque ran from 1500-4000rpm). It would lope along at 70mph pulling a relaxed 2500rpm. But i found the auto transmission hard to like, it was OK just trundling along, but if you wanted a shift on it never seemed to do what i wanted to and didn't seem to be well matched to the engine (out of all the automatic cars i've driven, the CVT on the Jazz was unquestionably the best match of engine and transmission, and doing what i wanted it to)

Edited by badbusdriver on 27/05/2025 at 18:41

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - John F

But i found the auto transmission hard to like,..... it never seemed to do what i wanted to and didn't seem to be well matched to the engine (out of all the automatic cars i've driven, the CVT on the Jazz was unquestionably the best match of engine and transmission, and doing what i wanted it to)

Have you actually tried the Stellantis 1.2 puretech EAT6 powertrain? I find this intelligent TC box hard to fault in our Pug 2008, only occasionally overriding it to slip it into 6th when trundling along a level road at 50mph (it only changes up at around 55mph.) I've never tried a CVT but I've read that the whining revs unrelated to road speed when accelerating hard, reminiscent of a slipping clutch, is unpleasant.

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - badbusdriver

But i found the auto transmission hard to like,..... it never seemed to do what i wanted to and didn't seem to be well matched to the engine (out of all the automatic cars i've driven, the CVT on the Jazz was unquestionably the best match of engine and transmission, and doing what i wanted it to)

Have you actually tried the Stellantis 1.2 puretech EAT6 powertrain? I find this intelligent TC box hard to fault in our Pug 2008, only occasionally overriding it to slip it into 6th when trundling along a level road at 50mph (it only changes up at around 55mph.)

No John, never tried one.

The last t/c auto i drove was a 6 speed unit in our Hyundai i30 turbo diesel. It was fine most of the time and way smoother than the DCT in the Bayon, but it seemed to also suffer from the same mismatch of shift programming(?) and engine as the DCT when pushing on. If you floor the accelerator to overtake at (say) 50 mph, you'd end up in the "wrong" gear, at rpm where the engines power had come and gone. So there would be little progress until the gearbox to change up and get into the meat of the plentiful torque on offer. One had to learn how much to push down on the accelerator to get the maximum (overtaking) acceleration because (counterintuitively) pushing it all the way down didn't. With the Jazz, it did!

I've never tried a CVT but I've read that the whining revs unrelated to road speed when accelerating hard, reminiscent of a slipping clutch, is unpleasant.

Yeah that is the perceived notion of CVT's. I was concerned about the general opinion on CVT's by the motoring press before we chose it, indeed that was the reason i joined this forum, to try and get opinion from owners. Probably is true of some (probably more so in the past), but certainly not with the Jazz. Not sure if this is simply because it is a more modern CVT, because it is (electronically) stepped to mimic having (seven) gears, or a combination. Not saying it didn't rev because it did, but that had nothing to do with it being a CVT. It revved because peak torque was at 5k rpm and peak power at 6k rpm.

My only other "experience" of a CVT was as a passenger in my Dad's Daf 55, memories of which are pretty vague, it being so long ago and my being 5-8 years old!

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - argybargy

Would you consider electric Argy?. If you were to say a £14k budget, there is a lot of tempting cars with a (quoted) range of 200+ miles out there as young as 2024...........

I briefly considered the Mk 3 Jazz Sport which Honda marketed with upwards of 120 bhp, but to my mind that sporty styling looks wrong on such a car. So the other Jazz option is the slightly bigger standard Mk3, which has a couple of extra BHP and (I think) a longer wheelbase.

Yeah its a shame Honda decided to only the 1.5 (130bhp) engine to the Jazz in sport trim, but even if that wasn't the case, it still wouldn't be everyone's cup of tea. With peak torque coming in at 4600rpm, it is very much a "traditional" Honda engine, i.e, needs a heavy right foot to get the best out of it!

We had a 3rd gen Jazz 1.3 with the CVT. Brilliant car in most respects and i didn't find its performance lacking (but then i was prepared to use the revs necessary to access what it could give!), not really a car for relaxed travel at the 70mph limit though. The peaky nature of the engine (peak torque was 5k rpm!) and the CVT's long legged ratios meant the least sign of a hill would send the revs flaring (dramatically so on a steeper hills) if you wanted to maintain the speed.

The car we had most recently was a Hyundai Bayon 1.0 turbo (120BHP) DCT. The engine on that was pretty much the polar opposite of the Jazz with plenty of torque at low revs (peak torque ran from 1500-4000rpm). It would lope along at 70mph pulling a relaxed 2500rpm. But i found the auto transmission hard to like, it was OK just trundling along, but if you wanted a shift on it never seemed to do what i wanted to and didn't seem to be well matched to the engine (out of all the automatic cars i've driven, the CVT on the Jazz was unquestionably the best match of engine and transmission, and doing what i wanted it to)

I don't think I could afford electric, BBD, and I'm not sure that I would go for that option even if I could. Perhaps a hybrid though, yes.

i remember you mentioning your CVT Jazz a few years back and wondering at the time whether yes, I should have gone auto. I did drive a Jazz auto before buying our current car but it seemed sluggish, although that could be due to problems caused by lack of maintenance. Or maybe it was my reluctance to "flog" a car that didn't belong to me, which probably makes me a rather unusual "test driver" of cars.

That Jazz Sport would probably have ticked most of our boxes except one the crucial one of ride quality. I used to laugh when my missus complained about bumps in the road that I couldn't feel, but I ain't laughing now because I'm feeling them too.

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - argybargy

.....trusted 2013 Honda Jazz. Its now 7 years since she arrived,.... she is getting a bit long in the tooth.

It's a machine. As construction workers and farmers know, hours of use, of which mileage is a rough guide, is more important than age. Assuming average annual mileage of c. 8000 and careful maintenance and corrosion prevention, a modern car should last at least 20yrs. As usual, the recommendations so far are the usual mainly Asian suspects. When we needed a replacement for our 19yr old Focus (which lasted another two years with our son) in 2019 we chose a last-of -the-line Mk1 Peugeot 2008 130 with EAT6 - a reliable user-friendly Aisin autobox. We would either choose the same again or consider a BYD EV and use our solar panels to charge it when the FIT contract runs out.

Many thanks. The Jazz is now 12 years old and soon to become the oldest car we've ever owned, equalling my very first which was a 1976 Ford Escort that I purchased in 1987 and sold two years later. Mechanically it has been looked after but no corrosion protection has ever been applied, and that's where I think the problems will occur, when they do. I feel as if its time for an upgrade in performance and ride quality, and there's not much I can do maintenance wise to enhance either of those factors.

Honda Jazz - Replacement for Honda Jazz - badbusdriver

The advert that BBD linked to the other day was for a model with over 170bhp, which is perhaps a bit much for me after 7 years in a Jazz.

Up to you of course, but I'd suggest not discounting this engine in the CX30 purely for this reason. The 178bhp of the might seem a reasonably high power output, but you need to bear in mind that it is naturally aspirated, i.e, no turbo. Most other cars of this type and age will be, and while many will have less than 178bhp, most will have more torque at lower revs and so will feel faster more of the time. The torque figure in the 130bhp 1.2 turbo fitted to the Peugeot 3008 (along with many other Stellantis nee PSA cars) is 230nm @ 1750rpm, the 178bhp Skyactiv X engine fitted to that CX30 makes 224nm @ 3000 rpm. So it isn't going to feel that fast unless you are really extending it (that peak bhp figure arrives at 6k rpm!)

I don't think I could afford electric, BBD

I don't understand this comment?. You said earlier that your budget was "not much more than £13k", so I was using £14k as maximum budget. Because of the heavy initial depreciation, nearly new electric cars can be a spectacular bargain. I'm using a tablet and haven't sussed out how to link an advert, but right now on Autotrader there is a 2024 Vauxhall Mokka e 50kWh with 14.5k miles for £13.5k. Unless you are dead set against EV's, they are well worth a look (and they will all be auto!)