Interesting replies im looking forward to hearing from others.
I only mentioned about them being dream cars so you know why these two choices. But the question is which would you have if there were no other cars on sale.
I also dont like the look of the evoque all my friends love it and say how cool and posh it looks but i roll my eyes i just see a gangster car dont know why but i do it just doesn't say sophistication and class to me.
|
Well I've often said I'd have to be paid to drive an Evoque as it's so hideous and clearly a triumph of marketing bling over function. But Volvo do seen to be slipping in terms of reliability in recent years, however, still preferable to anything currently made by JLR.
|
The Volvo. Proper estate with decent towing capacity. Wouldn't give an Evoque house room.
|
Given the confines of the question, it would be the Volvo. But it really would be a forced choice as i'd want neither. The Evoque is a triumph of style over substance, though contrary to what Avant seems to hint at, going by what i have read, it actually drives and handles really well. As for the Volvo, while i'd have one over an Evoque, i'd still take a V60 over an XC60 any day of the week. No fan of the Q3 either, the new one may look less like an Allegro than the last, but it still shares the same dumpy proportions.
I also find it most curious that these two options are being described as dream cars?. So if you won the lottery you wouldn't bother with a Ferrari, Bentley or whatever, you'd get yourself an XC60 and an Evoque for your partner?.
|
No - I'm sure the Evoque does drive and handle well, which is why it's favoured by many of the magazines. All I said was that I think it's ugly (opinion) and that it's unreliable (fact, although no doubt there are some good ones).
|
|
My partners dream car is an evoque.
My proper dream car i could never afford the volvo is my affordable dream car.
|
My proper dream car is a Lykan Hypersport.
|
I also like the look of the Xc40 but i know not a lot of people like that either.
|
|
What would i buy as a multi millionare, a 2018 on Toyota Century, and a new gen 70 series Landcruiser for general hacking, neither of which are sold here though the 70 series used to be, i had one for many years.
I too cannot abide the pretentious looks of the Ewok, it has nothing i want.
|
Gordenbennet , which car are you refering too as the Ewok?
|
Gordenbennet , which car are you refering too as the Ewok?
It's my teasing version of Evoque, maybe a little unfair to the genuine Ewoks of Star Wars fame, they did at least look cute and were quite reliable for little uns in a fight :-)
|
That made me laugh. They are cute but im a huge fan of chewy all the way.
|
I've always been a bit of a Volvo fan, even though I don't currently own one (Two older Mercs and a 2017 Q3).
So I would take them in this order:
XC60; XC40: Ewok
I don't hate the Evoque, but to me they're all fur coat and no knickers if you see what I mean, and the unreliability of Land Rover products is quite remarkable, and yet people still beat a path to their door.
|
I've always been a bit of a Volvo fan, even though I don't currently own one (Two older Mercs and a 2017 Q3).
So I would take them in this order:
XC60; XC40: Ewok
I don't hate the Evoque, but to me they're all fur coat and no knickers if you see what I mean, and the unreliability of Land Rover products is quite remarkable, and yet people still beat a path to their door.
Plastic mac and no knickers IMO. The Ewok is ugly, and vulgar, as are the other Land Rovers.
|
didn't another Ewok, ie Victoria "designer" *ahem* Beckham , design the style of the Evoke.
It's such a shame what "Spice" can do to some people's minds and bodies :( There but for the grace of God, go I
metro.co.uk/2017/07/17/car-trouble-for-victoria-be.../
If there's only 2 cars on the road, I would get a motorbike... or a tank.. or a helicopter..
Liam
|
ps my dream car is a bright green peugeot 106 1997 1.1
and when I say " dream" , I do , of course mean "nightmare " :)
Liam
|
|
My proper dream car is a Lykan Hypersport.
Interesting and rather obscure (apart from Fast and Furious fans of course) choice. What is it about the Hypersport, just the looks?. Certainly very little info available on whether or not it is any good (apart from W Motors own website). Also, should you win the lottery, you may struggle to find one at all, let alone for sale, as there only seems to have been about 7 made before it was replaced by the Fenyr Supersport. This is how EVO magazine sum up the Hypersport:
So is the Lykan Hypersport just an irrelevant indulgence or a meaningful exercise in car design and development? For those who care more about front-end grip than diamond-studded headlights probably not, but there will always be a market for this kind of vehicle.
At a reported £2.7million it's unlikely many drivers will get to experience the Lykan Hypersport, and those who do probably won't worry about how it drives. But as a car to show off in (and a star sharing the screen with Vin Diesel) there’s nothing quite like it.
Based on this, i think i'd rather have the Ruf CTR 3 it takes it's mechanical components from.
By the way, if you like the Volvo XC40, why go for the Q3?
Edited by badbusdriver on 09/02/2019 at 18:35
|
The looks were part of it but mainly due to Fast 7 love that film franchise.
Also good question regarding the Xc40 it was my first choice but waiting times were crazy compared with the Q3. Which suprised me as i thought they would be similar but the Xc40 was months more than the Q3 and i already have to wait months for the Q3.
|
Also good question regarding the Xc40 it was my first choice but waiting times were crazy compared with the Q3. Which suprised me as i thought they would be similar but the Xc40 was months more than the Q3 and i already have to wait months for the Q3.
The XC40 certainly seems to be getting rave reviews from the motoring press, so possibly the hype and publicity are contributing to the waiting list. Also, Volvo probably don't have the production capacity to meet (at least the initial) demand. The sheer number of Audi's being made means they are unlikely to have the same problem. Volvo may well be very much 'on the up', but they are still relatively small fish compared to Audi, BMW and Merc in terms of numbers and different models, which in the case of those three are getting out of hand with niches being spotted and filled as quickly as the marketing bods find/invent them!. In terms of current models, there are 32 different Audi's, 39 different BMW's and 36 Mercedes listed on this website's reviews page, compared to 12 Volvo's!.
I'm not really a fan of SUV's myself (you maybe guessed!), i'd rather have something more practical and genuinely useful like a Citroen Belingo/Peugeot Rifter/Vauxhall Combo Life. But that's just me(!), and i hope you like the Q3 when you get it.
|
32 Audis, 39 BMWs that's way too many. I remember when there was just an Audi 50, 80, 100 and 200. BMW had the 3, 5, 6 and 7 series. The world has gone mad, with manufacturers trying to fill niches that don't exist.
The Audi 50, wow, i wonder who else remembers that little gem?. Found this one for sale, according to the ad, only 4 in the UK!
www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C1066994
And if you do find another, it is unlikely to be standard!.
|
The Audi 50, wow, i wonder who else remembers that little gem?. Found this one for sale, according to the ad, only 4 in the UK!
www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C1066994
And if you do find another, it is unlikely to be standard!.
IIRC, we had the Polo in the UK, so no need for the 50 to be sold here. One of the early examples of VAG badge engineering.
Correct Trilogy.
I like the change up points marked on the speedo in red. 112km/h for third gear, that's 69 MPH, bet the little engine was screaming at that point.
|
The world has gone mad, with manufacturers trying to fill niches that don't exist.
I think they're more cruelly cynical than that, someone creates a niche which suddenly appeals for a variety of reasons, usually by accident, the big players see the possibilities and their marketing hyenas go into overdrive to make that niche the new must have by the most crass advertising imaginable.
Everyone had to have a hot looking hatch at one time, now it's an infinite variation of pseudo SUV's half of which would get stuck on a kerb if it didn't wreck their stupid wheels trying to mount it, maybe we're seeing the electric must have gradually stuttering into life, a fad which could easily be the next and very costly Betamax farce because we simply don't have the charging infrastructure to cope and i doubt we can afford to construct it, nor provide enough reliable affordable power if we did.
|
I think the Evoque is one of the ugliest cars around. It also seems much favoured by Skool Runners. So it would be the Volvo out of the two. One car for all time; either a Bentley Turbo or a '64 Ford Galaxie!
|
Volvo, please. Evoques always make me smile - they look as though a giant has sat on a Range Rover and squashed it!
Affordable dream car is somewhat oxym****ic. My two are the RR Dawn for the day car and Bugatti Chiron for fun.
|
I think the Evoque is one of the ugliest cars around. It also seems much favoured by Skool Runners. So it would be the Volvo out of the two. One car for all time; either a Bentley Turbo or a '64 Ford Galaxie!
To me, the Evoque looks like some crushed the roof. Its brother, the Disco Sport, is a nice looking car. Shame they aren't well engineered, in my view.
|
Interesting. A friend has an XC40 and he loves it , my partner and my friend both still think im an idiot for going for the Q3 as for the same price i could have had an inscription pro Xc40. The Q3 is the base model. Maybe i did make the wrong decision but it is what it is.
My partner says its not to late to cancel and change to the Xc40 and my friend said its worth the extra wair for an inscription pro Xc40. But im just so stubborn once i have made my mind up.
|
You're paying for it Sarah, your choice, when they are stumping up the cost they can have a say.
It sounds like the equivalent XC40 would be fully loaded with toys and trinkets, where the Q3 won't have quite so many, if you wanted a car jammed full of toys (to go wrong) you would have searched one out, they didn't mean that much to you so quite rightly you've chosen what is for you, and more power to your elbow.
I stubbornly stick to my old Landcruisers, despite people like Clarkson telling anyone who will listen how wonderful Range Rovers are and how awful and slow and old fashioned my choice is, well i stick with what i know is likely to give me years of trouble free service, yes they cost a lot to buy even when many years old, and they don't handle like a hot hatch, but they suit me and what i use them for...when someone else is paying for my motoring i'll take some notice of what they suggest, until then...
Edited by gordonbennet on 10/02/2019 at 11:45
|
The list price of the base model (new) Q3 is a lot less than an XC40 Inscription, so maybe you were offered a good deal on the Volvo.
I had a good long test drive in an XC40, and it doubtless suits many people's style of driving. If you like driving a Nissan Qashqai, you'll like the XC40: too wallowy for me and there was a feeling of remoteness in the steering. Very like the V60 that I was going to trade in. And it has given in to that infuriating (and possibly dangerous) trend of having heater and A/C controlled by a touchscreen.
BMWs are the opposite: rightly beloved of many, but you have to concentrate rather than relax behind the wheel to get the best out of one. For me (and these things are always personal) Audis and other VW Group cars hit the sweet spot in between. I can relax while still enjoying the drive, and of course concentrate on the road ahead.
So you're in no way an idiot in going for the Q3 rather than the XC40. Both are very good cars, but your choice is as good as your friend's.
Edited by Avant on 10/02/2019 at 12:40
|
Thanks Guys for your support. Im a very tough women who follows her mind not her heart and i never follow the crowd. I dont know if anyone will agree with me but i picked the Q3 instead of the Xc40 not just because of waiting times but also Avant your right i got a very good deal on the xc40 but even that did not tempt me.
The thing is i most of my female friends are always only bothered in if there car is "on trend" , what colour the seats are can they come in white , does it have the latest tech. But not me im more bothered in is it comfty , quite, can do my mileage, suits my needs and is it fun to drive , these are the things i look for i dont care what it looks like on the outside my female friends said the Q3 looks like a blop and looks dull. I thought well it ain't dull to drive. I love the q3 and i think audi have done a good job with there design of the new q3 and it suits me.
Its super comfty even the base model i found very comfty were the base model Xc40 i did not find comfty until i tried the inscription then the Xc40 was comfty but to me that just showed me overall audi has the better comfort.
Its quite i did a long test drive of the q3 and it never once bothered my hearing condtion. I think audis have good sound proofing.
And the big one for me was that it was fun to drive , now im no racer or speeder im a sensible driver but i love driving and not once did the Xc40 make me smile were the q3 did i enjoyed driving it and cant wait to get into mine. I just felt a connection behind the wheel of the q3.
I also did not find the Xc40 quite either not sure what there sound proofing is like?
So there were a few reasons why i picked the q3. Im also not one for tech its just more stuff that can go wrong.
|
My parnter has remimded me my Q3 is not the base model its the next one up the s line i dont know why i keep thinking its the base model for. Thats why it came to a similar price as the inscription pro xc40 but i could have save £3k on the xc40 as i was offered a good deal of £3k less. Both cars without deals came to around £37k.
Thought i would update my mistake.
|
My parnter has remimded me my Q3 is not the base model its the next one up the s line i dont know why i keep thinking its the base model for. Thats why it came to a similar price as the inscription pro xc40 but i could have save £3k on the xc40 as i was offered a good deal of £3k less. Both cars without deals came to around £37k.
Thought i would update my mistake.
I think the term "base model", certainly in the context of most modern cars, is rather misleading, as even the bottom of the range car is going to be equipped with everything you actually need!.
Not like the "base model" of the Dacia Sandero, where you only get it in white, wind up windows, manual mirrors and no radio (just the DIN slot so you can get something from halfords).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|