Abysmal colour choice - Trilogy

A friend was going to buy a Kia C'eed (what a crass name) until the salesman showed him the colour choice.

Flat red.

Flat white.

Flat black.

Two shades of grey. Fifty might have been better.

Another white, perhaps it was light, light grey.

At the Skoda dealer there was a choice of 12 colours. Double Kia's paltry offering. Rapid is crass name for an unsporty car. Still, he's happy because he's going to get a colour of his choice. Shame on Kia and all the other manufacturers who expect you to buy a car without any decent variety of colours.

Anyone feel the same? Or know why some companies offer such a tiny choice of colours?

Abysmal colour choice - RickyBoy
Choice of only 5 (metallics or pearl) available for that new Optima (plus just the one diesel engine size (1.7) in manual or auto for the UK market at the moment).

Kia clearly aiming to concentrate the mind these days?
Abysmal colour choice - nailit

Yes indeed very limited choice in fact more choice in cheap k1tchens furniture. .....sorry ;-)

Edited by nailit on 11/01/2016 at 18:01

Abysmal colour choice - Cyd

Or know why some companies offer such a tiny choice of colours?

Cost! E very additional colour on the pallete adds to the production costs of the vehicle, so I'm assuming it's to keep these costs down (and hence the cost of the cars down)

Abysmal colour choice - Wackyracer
I doubt the issue is cost, these new spray systems they use on the production line can spray a different colour for every bodyshell.

Not forgetting that they usually charge the customer a few hundred quid for the paint on top of the basic car price too.
Abysmal colour choice - alan1302
I doubt the issue is cost, these new spray systems they use on the production line can spray a different colour for every bodyshell. Not forgetting that they usually charge the customer a few hundred quid for the paint on top of the basic car price too.

If they only havea few colours they can buy it in larger bulk and have less variations to bulid in the factory. Kia are are at the lower end of the market to they need to make savings somewhere and the paint choices will be one of those.

Abysmal colour choice - gordonbennet

Hilux was similar, they named each colour too just to add insult to injury, black, white, silver, red, green and (carlo) blue which we chose.

These were colours from the SA factory for european models, for those markets where the vehicles were Thai built were a different and much nicer range of colours and interiors.

Its where upmarket makers score, you can choose some really lovely and unusual colours yet the majority of customers still go for the standard silver, grey, black, white...can't quite get me head round people having so little imagination.

BMW and Merc offer two really dark greens that are wonderful to look at, BMW's Oxford Green and Mercs Green Black which has to be one of the loveliest colours i've ever seen on a car.

Abysmal colour choice - Engineer Andy

They're not alone in reducing choice (somewhere in between the limitless [and expensive] Ford/Audi ones and Kia's would be nice). I was looking through the latest Mazda3 brochure and, other than in top 'Sport' spec (you can also choose between two flavours of cow hide), there is only ONE, yes ONE seat cover option (and in lovely 'grey' stripes as well) across the ENTIRE range!! Essentially no difference inside apart from the A/C controls (climate control on SE-L & Sport) and the heads-ip display on the Sport. Wooo!

When I bought my mk1 back in early 2006, there was about 6, and you (if I recall correctly) weren't limited to having leather seats as an option only if you had a 'Sport' model either. The colours of the cars generally are a bit limited/subdued as well - more than KIA's three but not exactly setting the world alight. Come'n guys - we SOME (decent) choices!

I wish I knew why there are so few options in some areas of the cars and not others, though I must admit Mazda appear to have cut down generally, my guess being to save money on needing to have so many variations in dash/body design, paint shop size and fitting costs for different components/trim sourced from outside suppliers (and perhaps in small quantities).

Abysmal colour choice - galileo

Personally, when buying a car the colour is well down my list of criteria: when I bought the last one I opted for plain red because metallic colours were an extra £300, which I preferred to have in my pocket.

Once I'm inside the car I only have to look at the bonnet, so unless its a colour I really don't like, it isn't as important to me as solid build quality, practicality (spare wheel!) performance etc.

Abysmal colour choice - Mike H

We recently bought a Honda CR-V. Lots of choice if variations on dark gloomy metallic is your thing, but no really eye-catching colours. Even the red was an orangey shade. We ended up with a bright silver.

Abysmal colour choice - drd63

Maybe Kia are just protecting buyers from themselves and rampant depreciation from speccing a car in some awful shade of green (Allegro LE anyone), brown or pink?

Abysmal colour choice - Trilogy

Maybe Kia are just protecting buyers from themselves and rampant depreciation from speccing a car in some awful shade of green (Allegro LE anyone), brown or pink?

Plenty of good colours to offer that don't ensure greater depreciation.

Abysmal colour choice - davecooper
I actually don't mind a limited range of specs as it makes choosing a model easier. I don't want to wade through a telephone directory sized brochure to choose a car. Three basic levels of spec with limited options like leather and upgraded sound system are fine by me. Would certainly like to see some braver colour choices from some manufacturers though. Not many greens or purples out there.
Abysmal colour choice - Engineer Andy

May be, but Mazda don't give ANY choice on interior trim unless you buy the top-of-the-range model (Sport), and even then its only two (expensive) varieties of leather seats. Not even three or four seat trim patterns/colours like they used to, two for the lower grades, three for the middle/upper and leather as an option on the top two grades.

You'd find it difficult (without looking at the wheel/tyres) to spot the difference between a lower range model and the top-spec one (about £3k between them for the same engine spec). It wouldn't be so bad if the cloth seat covers were actually nice (bland at best - I don't like them, and I don't want to pay for the Sport spec and its hard-riding/expensive 18in wheels/tyres to get a seat cover look I like [two-tone leather]). Why they could keep the nice black cloth seats with the small shiny blue or red [my Mazda3] dots I don't know - far better than the grey stripes (my mode's similar option with blue stripes was horrid). Still, better than the tartan carp VW Golf GTi owners get as 'standard' (I've seen better looking 'mum' bags with that 'cloth').

If I wanted ral cheapie no-frills, no-options motoing I would choose a Dacia or suchlike. Even KIA isn't the lower end of the market any more, and should (as should Mazda) be offering a reasonable range of no-cost options on the middle/upper middle of the ranges of their cars. Some of these issues are actually stopping me from considering some makes/cars unless they change specs. I wonder if other people are doing the same?

Abysmal colour choice - xtrailman

One of the reasons i prefer Jap cars is the lack of options, but a substantial standard kit.

The Sport model is on 19" wheels not 18" the SE on 17". Ride is firm but that's exactly how i like it, i suspect you didn't test drive the car?

I don't see a reason for Mazda to add extra colours, just red and silver would do for me, red is my favorite colour, but silver does not need washing very often, about 5 weeks normally.

Abysmal colour choice - Engineer Andy

The ride may be fine when new, but once the suspension 'wears in', you start to feel the bumps more on any car, but more so on very low profile tyres where there's far less air cushioning your ride, making the suspension work far harder, and presumably wearing it out quicker.

I also do not wish to have to pay well over £500 for a replacement set of tyres every 2-3 years (they last less than higher profile ones I find) when I could get a better ride on 16in or 17in rims (4 tyres costing about £300 fitted) and notice no difference (except in snow when it would be far better) in handling unless I thrashed the living daylights out of the car round a track.

I don't wish for German levels of options, but at least a reasonable number (remember - only one on the seat covers for people not wishing to/being able to afford the Sport model to get leather seats [which not everyone wants]) to choose from, as they had on the mk1. Not entirely unreasonable.

Abysmal colour choice - xtrailman

55 profile i wouldn't call low profile,fitted to the 19" wheels, even my last xtrail on 17" was on 60.

I've had an Audi on 45 and wouldn't touch one again, ride far too hard.

Yes the handling is better on the 19" wheels confirmed by a chap who sold me a full set of 19"wheels and tryes, but traded in on the 17" he bought for winter wheels. You might though get another 1mpg out of the 17" on 65 profile.