Is coasting downhill better than descending a hill in gear?

With my DVLA road tax reminder I received a leaflet exhorting me to save money (and petrol) by adopting a “smarter driving style”. Included was the advice not to coast downhill or towards lights in neutral “as this uses more fuel”. This seems counter-intuitive, so is it true, and why?

Asked on 30 June 2012 by JL. St Albans

Answered by Honest John
It's true. When decelerating in gear or descending a hill in gear with your foot off the accelerator the car's fuel supply is completely cut off and, effectively, the wheels turn the engine so it uses no fuel at all. You can see this on the car’s ‘instant consumption’ read-out. When coasting out of gear the engine uses a little bit of fuel to idle and stay running. The difference in consumption between in gear descents and coasting is actually tiny, but it is far safer to descend a hill in gear than to coast out of gear.
Similar questions
More than once in your column I've seen complaints by readers that cruise control is a fuel waster. I was always under the impression that cruise control allows the engine management system to select the...
I sold my Golf once it was repaired and replaced it with Ford Focus 125 Ecoboost, which is really nice to drive. I see the real world MPG for this car does look a little disappointing but I'm soon going...
Last year I bought a brand new 2012 Ford C-Max Zetec, and I have got to say the mpg I am getting is nowhere near as good as the manufacturer stated. I understand I will not get 68.9mpg. However, I have...
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer