The subframe of my car is cracking from corrosion. Does the manufacturer have any responsibility?
I've owned a 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLK from 2006. It's done 100k miles and is generally reliable. However, it needed the brake pipes replaced due to corrosion and, while doing this, the garage discovered cracking in the subframe from corrosion. They say it needs replacing as it's dangerous. No issues with previous MOTs. Never had this on any car before. Mercedes refuses to help out, saying the car is too old and not maintained in the dealer network. It seems like a problem on this model from the owners' forums. Does Mercedes have any responsibility?
Asked on 12 July 2021 by Jack Hughes

I'm sorry to read about the problems you're experiencing with your SLK, but Mercedes-Benz has no legal responsibility for a 15-year-old car (the statute of limitations ends at six years in England).
Tags:
compensation
Similar questions

I recently replaced the cambelt on my 2013 Ford Focus. Unfortunately, 5 days later the new cambelt failed, a tensioner bolt snapped. I lost the cost of a nights accommodation booked for the night of failure...

Whatever happened to the diesel claims which we were all asked to put in? Pogust Goodhead does send the occasional email but this has been going on for years now. Has it all been a big scam?

My Ford Fiesta 1.0-litre EcoBoost, registered/made in early 2016 with 67,000 miles, has just had a cam belt failure which has destroyed the engine.
The guidance from Ford is to change the cam belt at...
Related models
.jpg?width=115&height=75&rmode=crop)
Georgeous jewel like looks reminiscent of a miniature McLaren SLR. Electric folding hard top. A much desired and aspired to car.