Talk reaction

I know you have spoken out about clutch/dual mass flywheels before but the problem is very widespread. How can something be done about it? Is it fair that customers are still having to fork out for mechanical parts known to be a disaster? How much longer can so-called "reputable" car manufacturers keep using them? As it is costing them nothing - they pass the cost onto the customer telling them it is their "driving style" - why will they ever change and yet it is quite clear these parts are not "fit for purpose". No-one should be expected to pay for replacements when it is a known problem, but as you can see from my letter to charge £1,500 is simply despicable. It is time these DMFs were abandoned.

Asked on 10 April 2010 by C.G., via e-mail

Answered by Honest John
Manufacturers are now building cars where the ECU fulfils the same
function as a DMF, restricting torque in the first two gears to reduce
torque reactions on the transmission. The first application of this is in the current Fiesta 1.6 diesel that has no DMF.
Similar questions
We have a 2010 Mitsubishi ASX Diesel (1.8 MiVec engine, rather than the newer non-VVT engine) and at 34,000 miles the clutch started slipping intermittently, especially when the turbo kicks in. It's covered...
I've been getting a kind of honking sound when I change down gears (usually from 3rd to 2nd). My local garage says it sounds like a dual mass flywheel problem, which costs over £1,000 to replace. I drive...
I have run a 2010 D3 Volvo XC60 auto for 30 months now on mainly short journeys with no DPF problems. I am thinking of changing to a new D5 manual. Is there any difference in likelihood of future DPF problems...
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer