You can't legislate to protect people from themselves, if they're stupid enough to consider paying interest of 2000% or more to a bunch of fast buck wideboys, then let them.
So why bother legislating against cigarettes, alcohol, drugs, rogue traders etc etc?
And look at the effect all this legislation has had, almost nil, now we have calls to legalise drugs because those in power have failed in their duty to deal effectively with the problem.
Some people are inherantly stupid, short of becoming a version of the USSR (and our modern EU version is heading that way) where there are no freedoms other than those granted by favour of the apparatchiks, then the stupid/gullible/half witted will always smoke drink or drug themselves into their own personal hell, you cannot legislate against stupidity.
As for rogue traders, if it quacks and waddles there's every chance its a duck...i've seen the wide boys as featured on such programs and i wouldn't give them a second of my time, if people think a fast talking geezer in a tranny van who calls them sorr is an honourable businessman and want to put several thousand cash pounds in his sweaty mitt so be it....what else do you do put half the population in protective custody?
The irony of all this is that the biggest con of our time is a large percentage of our own dishonourable politicians, they make the legislation (or rather rubber stamp that of the EUSSR) so are hardly likely to outlaw themselves.
Edited by gordonbennet on 09/07/2013 at 08:26
|