Learners - Ben 10

Can I take my kid out on the road for driving lessons under my insurance policy or do they have to have seperate cover while I am in the car instructing them?

Learners - unthrottled

Unless you have an unusual policy, you'll need to add them as a named driver. Insurers often lets you add named drivers for short periods and it isn't too expensive for provisional drivers. new full licence drivers are a different matter....!

Learners - jamie745

Yes you'll need to add the sprog as a named driver but like unthrottled says, it's not too expensive for those with a green licence.

If you work hard and pass the most up to date test in the land, you get hammered for doing so. Another symptom of race-to-the-bottom Britain.

Learners - RT

If you work hard and pass the most up to date test in the land, you get hammered for doing so. Another symptom of race-to-the-bottom Britain.

No - it reflects the fact that learners have very low claims rates while they're supervised but newly qualified drivers have high claims.

The only alternative to risk based premiums to to have a government levy like VED - but can you imagine what the total cost of that would be.

Any practical suggestions for reducing the accident rate and/or claims cost for newby drivers ?

Learners - jamie745

You're missing the point by declaring the only reason for the huge gap is due to 'risk based premiums' when that's clearly not the case. The United States has lower insurance premiums than the UK despite being the most litigious nation on Earth, with some states allowing 15 year olds to drive and a much worse rate of car accidents than the UK.

Why?

The fact is the insurance merry-go-round industry itself does just as much to inflate claims costs as new drivers do and even if new drivers suddenly became 'risk-free' do you think their premiums would come down?

Give me a break.

Learners - RT

The USA has many disimilarities with the UK, including much lower rural traffic densities

Do you really think that UK insurers are penalising new drivers by loading their premiums even higher than their claim costs? For what end, to subsidise drivers with lower claims ?

Insurance is a competitive industry, like any other, so plenty of scope for a new insurer to "undercut" all the others by offering purely risk-based premiums - how come no-one does?

Industry and commerce either works under free market conditions or state control with price controls - there is no in-between.

Inexperienced male drivers have much higher claims than inexperienced female drivers but recent EC legislation requires their risk-based premiums to be shared - I certainly feel that's a step too far in imposing sex equality - equal opportunity is one thing but enforced equality is wrong, IMO.

Learners - Collos25

The insurance premiums in the states seem very reasonable at first but there are so many add ons and taxes it ends up as much if not more than the UK.

Learners - jamie745

The USA has many disimilarities with the UK, including much lower rural traffic densities

Yet despite that you're 4 times more likely to die on an American road than a British road, yet their insurance is cheaper than ours.

Do you really think that UK insurers are penalising new drivers by loading their premiums even higher than their claim costs? For what end, to subsidise drivers with lower claims ?

Bashing the customer you don't like to benefit the one you want to keep would be an entirely new tactic wouldn't it.....

Insurance is a competitive industry, like any other, so plenty of scope for a new insurer to "undercut" all the others by offering purely risk-based premiums - how come no-one does?

Because - much like our political class - they're all the same. They're all run by the same people, usually linked to the same bank and under close inspection are all the same 2 or 3 companies.

Industry and commerce either works under free market conditions or state control with price controls - there is no in-between.

Don't think major financiers and brokers are free marketeers though, they're not. They're the biggest socialists this side of Ken Livingstone.

Inexperienced male drivers have much higher claims than inexperienced female drivers but recent EC legislation requires their risk-based premiums to be shared

It's the EU, not the EC and if you don't want it to apply to Britain then vote UKIP.

I certainly feel that's a step too far

Well first off this actually started because Belgian womens groups complained about having lower annual private pension payouts (because they live longer) and that movement grew into equalised insurance. Its application to car insurance was an accidental side effect really.

It's only really got this far because insurance prices have become so silly. You can't tell me inexperienced drivers cause more carnage now than they did 30 years ago, so the real reason for rising claims costs must lie with the insurance industry itself.

They managed to insure the inexperienced 30 years ago on - adjusted for inflation - cheaper premiums, why can't they do it now? Probably because they don't want to.

I'm not usually a fan of meddling legislation - and I'm not a 'fan' of this sticking plaster solution either - but when insurance companies ignore basic mathematics like women drive less miles and make up a minority of motorists so obviously they'll claim less, something does have to be done.

Edited by jamie745 on 14/05/2013 at 00:02

Learners - TeeCee

What would be interesting to know is what the American police's attitude to suspected insurance fraud is.....

I'll bet it's not "oh, that'll be difficult to prove, we'll drop it", as I saw on "Motorway cops" the other night. That week's programme ran a theme of "crash for cash" and presented a couple of obvious cases involving several people. The number of resulting prosecutions was, er, none.

I'd also be prepared to wager that when trying to claim a huge whack for personal injury off a yank insurer, you'd better be able to prove it in court!

Learners - Andrew-T

Give me a break.

Jamie, you seem to treat this site as your personal whingeing space. Maybe you should choose to settle in a country you like better, and give us the break? :-)

Learners - FP

"Jamie, you seem to treat this site as your personal whingeing space. Maybe you should choose to settle in a country you like better, and give us the break?"

I cannot believe you said that. Jamie regularly contributes perceptive and succinct comments on a range of topics, never allowing personal prejudice to stand in the way of sensitive responses to other posts.

Learners - madf

You're missing the point by declaring the only reason for the huge gap is due to 'risk based premiums' when that's clearly not the case. The United States has lower insurance premiums than the UK despite being the most litigious nation on Earth, with some states allowing 15 year olds to drive and a much worse rate of car accidents than the UK.

Why?

The fact is the insurance merry-go-round industry itself does just as much to inflate claims costs as new drivers do and even if new drivers suddenly became 'risk-free' do you think their premiums would come down?

Give me a break.

As ever jamie manages to let his prejudices overcome the facts which he has not bothered to present - presumably because he could not be bothered to find out what young US drivers pay for insurance..

"“Our survey found that households with teen drivers shell out an average of nearly $3,100 each year to allow their teens to drive,” said Larry Thursby, Vice President of Auto Product & Pricing at Nationwide Insurance"

tinyurl.com/3z9ufup


Edited by madf on 15/05/2013 at 17:21

Learners - Bromptonaut

Can I take my kid out on the road for driving lessons under my insurance policy or do they have to have seperate cover while I am in the car instructing them?

As below, you need to add the kid to your policy as a named driver. Did this with both daughter and son in last 4yrs. In both cases the premium while they were learners went from c£300 to c£800.

After they'd passed adding daughter was about same but then a change from Elephant to Admiral it went back down to £300. Son, even after the removal of gender from the premium/risk equation was a lot more - £1500 and irrespective of the facts they listed him as main user.

Problem solved by jumping ship to LV.

Learners - jc2

Many states in the US allow young people to drive-but usually in very restricted areas,ie to and from school! and nowhere else.

Learners - Chris M

I taught both of my sons to drive in one of our cars. For the first one we used Covered Learner as it worked out cheaper. The advantage being that it's their own insurance and if a claim is made, it doesn't affect your own insurance. It could be purchased in 28 day chunks with a discount for the longer periods. We ended up with 140 days. Other learner driver policies are out there.

By the time the second son came to learn, the first was a named driver on his mother's car. It then only cost £150 to add him as a learner, so worked out a bit cheaper than Covered Learner. Like his brother, he passed 1st time (excellent teacher!) and LV only charged £15 for the 3 months up to renewal.

Learners - Ben 10

Just did a search on tinternet this morning and found via a Guardian article back in 2010 an insurance company called "Marmalade Insurance" that will insure a provisional learner for £85 a month. The policy also gives the learner a no claims bonus, but the policy expires when they obtain a full licence. A cheaper way than adding them to your own policy.

You can check for yourselves if interested but works by insuring the learner in your car. If they have a biff they pay your insurance company which wont affect your own policy.

Could be a very cheap way to give your kids driving tutition without breaking the bank. I'll only be doing it as my daughter gets proficient enough with an instructor she already has, and she needs extra driving prior to her test, or failing that afterwards if she fails.

Bye the way I have no connection with this company. If anyone has any experience with this company good or bad, let us know. Otherwise I'll give them a try in a couple of months and report back.