10 Things Vitara

How To Drive Native Copy1

California Native

GGG SE Copy (2)

Dash Cam Comp1

GGG SE Copy (1)

Deals Of The Week

Native Subscribe5

Mot Files

Cfs Native

Native Subscribe5

Real Mpg Native

Mercedes-Benz Reviews

New Cars
Good: First four-cylinder AMG model produces 360PS from turbocharged 2.0-litre engine. Impressive handling and grip levels. As quick as you'd expect. Mercedes Benz Mitsubishi EVO 9.
Bad: Expensive with a starting price of more than £37,000. Doesn't respond to the driver quite like an EVO 9.
Good: High quality interior. Strong diesels. A250 AMG Sport 4MATIC the best of the range.
Bad: Handling not up to BMW 1 Series. Suspension a little on the firm side.
Good: Aluminium framed and bodied 1,540kg front mid engined junior supercar with 4.0-litre biturbo V8 engine developing 462PS or 510PS.
Bad: Prices from £97k, £110 for the 510PS S and option packs such as carbo ceramic brakes can add a lot to that.
Good: Economical and practical. Interior quality and refinement improved. Pleasant, smooth shifting optional dual clutch automatic transmission does not suffer from same fault as DSG.
Bad: Not a sports car, so choosing 18-inch wheels creates a fidgety ride on rough roads.
Good: Much improved interior quality. More refined and better to drive than predecessor. C200 Bluetec is very impressive and economical. New six-speed manual.
Bad: Limited engine range initially. C220 CDI with automatic gearbox is disappointing.
Good: Well built and attractively styled. Available with low emission diesel engines. Entry-level C180 petrol is surprisingly good.
Bad: It's not as sporty to drive as you might think. Looks very similar to the saloon.
Good: Classier looking coupe version of impressive new C-Class.
Bad: Not arriving here until 2016.
Good: Fantastic depth of quality. Lovely cabin ambience and improved interior space. Very refined, quiet and composed – even the four-cylinder diesels.
Bad: No 4Matic four-wheel drive models for the UK. Expensive options required to get the best from it. Only a minor luggage space improvement. Unintuitive infotainment interface.
Good: Most refined and comfortable small van on the market. Big improvement on the Renault Kangoo it's based on. 109 CDI BlueEfficiency returns a claimed 65.7mpg.
Bad: Rival vans are cheaper.
Good: Small and stylish saloon based on the A-Class. Better quality ride. Decent sized boot given its size. Well finished interior. Better looking estate version from 2015.
Bad: Not particularly engaging or rewarding to drive. Rear seats are only really any good for occasional use.
Good: Handsome looking small estate. Good interior design. CLA 200 CDI is economical.
Bad: Sporty looks aren't quite reflected in the way it drives. Top models are expensive. Boot isn't that practical.
Good: Big CO2 reductions. Four-cylinder CLS 250 CDI available at last. Precisely-built interior. Retains unique style of original CLS. Comes with full LED headlights.
Bad: Rear headroom tight for taller passengers. Options expensive.
Good: Stunning estate version of the CLS. Has rakish coupe-like looks combined with 'shooting brake' practicality.
Bad: Top models are expensive. Exterior styling will not be to everyone's taste. Isn't the most engaging car to drive. Load space is awkward reach due to low hatch height.
Good: Distinctive and sharp looks. Excellent CDI diesels. Good motorway cruiser. Very comfortable and refined. Feels very well built.
Bad: Steering could do with more feel. Interior not as inviting as other premium saloons. Numerous reports of automatic transmission problems and software glitches.
Good: Elegant styling. Little top-down turbulence. Good selection of petrol and CDI diesel engines. Roof folds down (and up) on the move.
Bad: Not very exciting or involving to drive. Awkward shaped boot, Cramped rear seats. Springy manual gearchange. Four-cylinder diesels noisy with roof down.
Good: Classy and upmarket coupe. Superb C350 CDI engine. Decent headroom in the back. Good-sized boot. Supportive and comfortable seats.
Bad: Four-cylinder E250 CDI model is noisy and lacks refinement. Old fashioned touches like foot-operated parking brake.
Good: Well built and sharp styling. Huge and useful boot space. Comfortable long distance car. Excellent CDI diesels. Very refined.
Bad: Doesn't deal with corners as well as other premium estates. Disappointing smaller petrol engines.
Good: Huge road presence. Very exclusive and hand built to exacting standards. Bomb-proof reliability. Unstoppable off road but with a luxurious interior.
Bad: Only available through the Specialist Products Division at Mercedes-Benz World at Brooklands in Surrey. High list prices. Not designed for corners.
Good: Impressive ride quality. Available with two or four-wheel drive. Good rear passenger and load space. High quality interior finish.
Bad: Lacklustre dual clutch automatic. 220 CDI noisy and not as good as competitor diesel engines. Driving position not as high as other compact SUVs.
Good: Excellent refinement and very composed ride quality. Quiet diesel engine. Superb cabin quality. Spacious for rear seat passengers. Capable off-road if need be.
Bad: High price. Best ride quality depends on optional air suspension. COMAND system is still frustrating to use. Four-seat accommodation only. No room for a spare wheel.
Good: Surprisingly capable off-road. Luxurious cabin. Impressive V6 diesel.
Bad: Ride can be choppy on poor roads. Boot space on hybrid models is poor. BMW X5 and Volvo XC90 offer better value for money.
Good: Huge performance and road presence.
Bad: Limited rear visibility.
Good: Luxurious and spacious. The best big seven-seat 4x4 SUV. Adjustable air suspension standard. Outrageous performance from GLS 63 AMG.
Bad: They don't make parking spaces big enough. Unsuitable for the school run. Expensive to buy and run.
Good: New camper van from Mercedes-Benz built in-house. Will rival the Volkswagen California. Expect high quality.
Bad: Marco Polo Activity doesn't come with a sink, fridge or hob.
Good: More spacious and economical than before. High quality and comfortable interior. Great motorway cruiser. Impressive refinement.
Bad: ML 250 CDI engine can feel sluggish. 7G-Tronic gearbox not quick to respond. Poor in corners.
Good: Supremely comfortable with an elegant yet modern interior. Handles impressively well for such a big car. Reasonable economy and emissions.
Bad: S300 has a 2.1-litre diesel which can be noisy at times.
Good: Sleek successor to CL bursting with high tech features. S63 AMG Coupe offers Ferrari performance in an opulent 4-seater coupe.
Bad: S63 AMG Coupe Starts at £125,000. S65 AMG Coupe starts at £183,000. Not as 'engaging' to drive as an S500.
Good: Impressively refined with a smooth ride. Metal folding roof means it's as quiet as a coupe. AMG versions are brutally fast.
Bad: Doesn't feel particularly special given the price tag. Comfortable rather than outright sporty. Steering lacks feel.
Good: High quality interior. Three roof options. Offered with 250 CDI diesel engine. Also available with 5.5 litre V8.
Bad: Not as good to drive as competition. Optional automatic isn't quick or decisive enough. High list prices. Avoid 18-inch wheels.
Good: Improved Sprinter gets sharper look. Engines more economical. Better interior comfort. Quieter on the move than before. Still the best van on the market.
Bad: Not a brand new van more a thorough revamp.
Good: Replacement for Viano. More premium than before.
Bad: Not coming until 2015.
Good: Excellent quality and great to drive, Car-like refinement and cabin. Crew cab and minibus variants. Good standard equipment levels.
Bad: Foot-operated parking brake is a pain. 1.6-litre engine a little lethargic when laden. No high roof option.
Used Cars
Cars not officially imported to the UK
Concept Cars

Reader Offers and Prizes

Buying Advice

Honest John's Newsletter

Connect with Honest John

Facebook YouTube