Motorway Safety - can this be right?

On a recent trip west-bound on the M62, I joined lane 3 to overtake slower traffic. I observed a vehicle in lane 1 indicating and out of the corner of

my eye I spotted the vehicle in lane 2 that I was overtaking make a move towards lane 3 where I was passing him.

Fortunately I was able to squeeze into the remaining space between the lane and the barriers to narrowly avoid a collision.

Today whilst on a similar journey I noticed that similar space outside lane 3 that could offer a modicum of refuge was polluted with sandbagged iron stands with signs for the 50mph restriction on the east bound carriageway (westbound had reverted to 70mph limit).

In similar circumstances a collision with one of these signs would probably have had fatal consequences, so I ask why can't these signs be bolted to the dividing barrier or wall to reduce the chance of a death or serious injury.

Asked on 20 October 2014 by Wish131

Answered by Honest John
Probably because bolting them to the barrier would take too much time, which would mean closing off that lane for longer to put the temporary speed restriction signs in place.
Tags: driving
Similar questions
My recently purchased Peugeot 3008 comes with an electric parking brake as standard. This is the first car I have owned with this type of brake, and I am struggling to master it. With the car on a level...
Are front engine, rear wheel drive cars more stable in the wet than front engine, front wheel drive?
My sister is concerned about the amount of complex electronics in todays cars, she's now looking for a newer car but is worried that she'll have to adjust electric steering on the dashboard for different...
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer