Should my Suzuki SX4 have been sold with newer tyres?

The original tyres have perished on my April 2012 Suzuki SX4. A report prepared by Kwikfit states that the tyres were manufactured in week 33 of 2010. They were described as badly perished and immediate replacement was advised, despite 5mm of tread remaining. The supplying Suzuki dealer was not interested in the issue nor would it seem is Suzuki, despite writing to the UK Managing Director. Suzuki seems unprepared to divulge the date of manufacture of my car. The tyres have a DOT 3310, the battery is dated 3710 and the seat belts have a 2010 label. Various plastic panels are stickered 2010.

A car may be deemed to have been born on the date of registration but there are perishable and time limited items on a car such as tyres, brake fluid, engine oil and battery and I believe some are safety issues. For example if my car has sat in a storage pound for 18 months before registration, a brake fluid change should have taken place after six months of ownership, brake fluid being hygroscopic whether the car is parked or driven and the car handbook indicates a change as necessary after two years. My car does have a problem with a sticking brake calliper and it seems it is going to be me who picks up the bill. I also feel much deceived by the process as I part exchanged a 2009 Suzuki SX4 for what I thought was a car three years younger. I would be most grateful for advice on how to proceed with these issues and bring them to a satisfactory conclusion.

Asked on 14 September 2013 by GM, Penrith

Answered by Honest John
If plastic components on the car are stickered 2010, then the car was built in 2010, because all components for a modern car are made 'just in time' and never more than a month before they go into the car. How badly tyres perish depends partly on the compound and partly how much UV light has hit them. So a tyre stored in a cool, dark room will not deteriorate while a tyre on a car parked in bright sunlight will. If you bought the car "new" from a dealer then that is who you would have to sue for selling it with tyres "not of satisfactory quality".

Law is here: www.honestjohn.co.uk/faq/consumer-rights/ but since tyre "life" is generally agreed to be five years, you could only sue for losing the difference between five years and the period you have owned the car.
Similar questions
I purchased a car in May. The initial drive home on smooth motorways was okay but the day after I realised the car was very bumpy and erratic on urban roads and potholes etc. On inspection, I found an...
I took delivery of a new Ford Focus Estate fitted with 17-inch Michelin Primacy 4 tyres. The car had 8 miles on the odometer upon delivery. However, when I got home the tyre tread looked unusually threadbare....
I've just bought a used Porsche 911 Turbo and the front tyres are the originals by the look of them. They've got plenty of tread left, as they've only done 8000 miles, but they're probably seven or eight...
Related models
Reasonably spacious five-seater with a decent boot, strong and economical diesel, tidy handling in 4WD.
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer