Your correspondent has consumer rights against a vendor if something is not sold as advertised.

As part of my economics degree course in the 1960s, I had to study Commercial Law. I was taught that according to the law of contract (not sale of goods) if any vendor advertises a product to the world at large, then that product must be as advertised. The case law is based on the famous ruling in Carlyle v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. Your correspondent KR may not succeed in the small claims court, but he does have consumer rights against the vendor.

Asked on 25 May 2013 by MS, Rochdale

Answered by Honest John
No one has any consumer rights against a vendor if the vendor is a private individual and not a trader. He may have contractual rights. But he does not have consumer rights. The case your refer to involves a trader: the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company, not a private individual.
Similar questions
I took out a contract lease on a new Ford Ranger. The vehicle broke down on delivery due to a variety of warning lights on the dash and was taken back to ford, in November 2016, since then I have personally...
A friend of mine bought a car from a dealer with six months warranty. After five months the head casket has blown and they are refusing to repair it. Where does she stand?
I’ve bought a Cat S vehicle by accident as it wasn’t on the write off database and the HPI search was clear. I’ve spoken to the salvage yard and it was written off but never recorded as Cat S. The dealer...
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer