Metallic or non-metallic paint?

I've placed an order for a new Audi Q3 TFSI, but need advice regarding paint. I’ve been given two choices: Brilliant Black (gloss black, non-metallic, no extra cost) or Phantom Black (pearlescent black, £525). Will the pearlescent paint likely to be harder wearing against the elements? And in your experience, which paint is likely to age better in years to come?

Asked on 12 September 2013 by luciusfox

Answered by Honest John

The gloss black non metallic will probably have a thin clearcoat of lacquer, but will be very difficult to keep clean and shiny (it's the most difficult colour). So probably worth paying the extra for the pearlescent black.

Tags: paint and bodywork

Similar questions

Is it worth me buying paint protection with my new Audi Q3?

I am about to change my car and am planning to purchase a new Audi Q3, and the salesman is encouraging me to pay extra for paint protection, namely Autoglyn or Supaguard. What is your opinion? Is it worth...

Car dealer is offering Autoglym Lifeshine - is it worth paying extra for?

I am buying a car and I have been quoted £370 for the dealer to apply Autoglym Lifeshine. I think this is too much but he won’t budge on the price. Is it worth the extra or can I buy this and apply it...

Is it normal for engine bay to be partially painted?

I looked under the bonnet of my new Citroen C5 X yesterday, and was surprised that the engine bay is only partially painted in the body colour. It actually looks a mess, like an overspray. So most of...

Related models