Will it be more economical for me to run a petrol CR-V than my current diesel CR-V?

I am considering changing my 2009 diesel Honda CR-V for a new petrol CR-V. Is there an annual mileage limit whereby it makes it more economical to run a petrol rather than a diesel, and are there any other criteria to help me make the choice to stay with diesel or change to petrol? Your advice would be greatly appreciated

Asked on 15 September 2011 by WM, Kendal

Answered by Honest John
I reckon at least 15,000 miles a year. Diesel engines are usually 20 per cent - 30 per cent more economical than petrol engines. But the technology now applied to them to make them run smoothly with low emissions makes them very vulnerable to expensive failure that can cost far more than any saving in fuel costs. Diesel particulate filters last between 60,000 and 120,000 miles. Dual mass flywheels last 50,000 - 100,000 miles. Exhaust gas recirculation valves can fail. Turbos can fail. Repairs between years three and six could amount to £6000.
Similar questions
Regarding latest EU emission regulations for diesel engines, could you please give us more information on the subject of the particulate filters being adversely affected by repeated short journeys? I have...
I have driven Volvos with tremendous satisfaction since 1970, currently a V70 diesel estate, but now at 82 I am finding it difficult to get in and out of, mainly due to the low profile of modern cars these...
I own a 2007 5 Series BMW diesel automatic. The car has a full service history, but is high mileage at 85,000. The DPF light came on and the message said that the car was safe to continue driving, however...
Related models
Roomy and versatile. Very comfortable, pleasant and relaxing to drive. not at all cumbersome. 2.2 i-CTDI diesel is excellent.
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer