
REAL MPG:
Suzuki Swift (2010 - 2017)
.jpg)
32–74
Real MPG
48.7
Average
Excellent equipment across the range, great fun to drive regardless of the engine, sport version is huge fun, 4x4 is great for rural areas.
Small boot limits practicality, interior feels cheap, lacks the refinement of modern rivals.
Select engine for more Real MPG information:
Engine | Official MPG | Real MPG Avg. | Real MPG % | |
1.2 | 56.5 mpg | 50.5 mpg | 89% | ![]() |
1.2 4x4 | 51.3 mpg | 43.4 mpg | 85% | ![]() |
1.2 Automatic | 50.4 mpg | 44.4 mpg | 88% | ![]() |
1.2 Dualjet | 65.7 mpg | 53.3 mpg | 81% | ![]() |
1.2 Dualjet 4x4 | 51.3–58.8 mpg | 55.2 mpg | 100% | ![]() |
1.3 DDiS | 67.3–72.4 mpg | 61.6 mpg | 88% | ![]() |
1.6 Sport | 44.1 mpg | 41.2 mpg | 93% | ![]() |
Sport | 44.1 mpg | 42.3 mpg | 96% | ![]() |
Read the Honest John review...
-
Suzuki Swift (2010 - 2017)
Excellent equipment across the range, great fun to drive regardless of the engine, sport version is huge fun, 4x4 is great for rural areas.
Rivals
Suzuki Swift (2010 - 2017) | 48.7 | avg mpg |
Peugeot 208 (2012 - 2019) | 52.9 | avg mpg |
Skoda Fabia (2015 on) | 49.1 | avg mpg |
Ford Fiesta (2013 - 2017) | 46.8 | avg mpg |