REAL MPG:
Suzuki Swift (2010 - 2017)
.jpg)
000515
32–74
Real MPG
48.7
Average
Excellent equipment across the range, great fun to drive regardless of the engine, sport version is huge fun, 4x4 is great for rural areas.
Small boot limits practicality, interior feels cheap, lacks the refinement of modern rivals.
Select engine for more Real MPG information:
| Engine | Official MPG | Real MPG Avg. | Real MPG % | |
| 1.2 | 56.5 mpg | 50.6 mpg | 89% |  |
| 1.2 4X4 | 51.3 mpg | 43.4 mpg | 85% | |
| 1.2 Automatic | 50.4 mpg | 44.1 mpg | 88% | |
| 1.2 Dualjet | 65.7 mpg | 54.0 mpg | 82% | |
| 1.2 Dualjet 4x4 | 51.3–58.8 mpg | 54.3 mpg | 99% | |
| 1.3 DDiS | 67.3–72.4 mpg | 61.6 mpg | 88% | |
| 1.6 Sport | 44.1 mpg | 41.3 mpg | 94% | |
| Sport | 44.1 mpg | 42.3 mpg | 96% | |
Our Fuel Cost Calculator shows you which will be the best choice for you.
Compare the running costs of petrol, diesel and electric cars to make the right choice for you.
Read the Honest John review...
-
.jpg)
Suzuki Swift (2010 - 2017)
Excellent equipment across the range, great fun to drive regardless of the engine, sport version is huge fun, 4x4 is great for rural areas.
.jpg)
Rivals
| Suzuki Swift (2010 - 2017) | 48.7 | avg mpg |
| Peugeot 208 (2012 - 2019) | 52.8 | avg mpg |
| Kia Rio (2011 - 2017) | 50.2 | avg mpg |
| Alfa Romeo MiTo (2008 - 2018) | 41.6 | avg mpg |
.jpg)
.jpg)
