Real MPG: SsangYong Turismo (2013 - 2018)
Much better looking than its predecessor. Extremely spacious. Vastly improved by 2.2 engine and seven-speed auto gearbox.
Original 2.0-litre engine is not good to drive, nor very economical. Cabin materials far from the best.
Select engine for more Real MPG information:
| Engine | Official MPG (NEDC) | Official MPG (WLTP) | Real MPG Avg. | Real MPG % | |
| 2.0 e-XDi | 37.2 mpg | - | - | - | |
| 2.0 e-XDi Automatic | 34.9–36.2 mpg | - | - | - | |
| 2.2 e-XDi | 37.7 mpg | - | - | - | |
| 2.2 e-XDi Automatic | 35.3–36.2 mpg | - | 32.1 mpg | 90% |
Read the Honest John review...
.jpg?width=310&height=175&rmode=crop)
SsangYong Turismo (2013 - 2018)
Much better looking than its predecessor. Extremely spacious. Vastly improved by 2.2 engine and seven-speed auto gearbox.
Rivals
| SsangYong Turismo (2013 - 2018) | 32.1 | avg mpg |
| Citroen C4 Picasso (2013 - 2018) | 48.8 | avg mpg |
| Ford B-MAX (2012 - 2017) | 41.3 | avg mpg |
| BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (2014 - 2021) | 45.4 | avg mpg |
.jpg?width=300&height=160&rmode=crop)
Submit your Real MPG
