REAL MPG:
Ford C-MAX (2003 - 2010)
000892
21–65
Real MPG
40.6
Average
Best entry and egress of any car anywhere. Excellent front seat comfort.
Not so practical as an MPV with odd sliding rear seat arrangement.
Select engine for more Real MPG information:
| Engine | Official MPG | Real MPG Avg. | Real MPG % | |
| 1.6 | 40.9–42.8 mpg | 35.1 mpg | 84% |  |
| 1.6 TDCi | 57.6–60.1 mpg | 51.9 mpg | 88% | |
| 1.6 TDCi 90 | 58.9–60.1 mpg | 54.8 mpg | 92% | |
| 1.6 Ti-VCT | 42.8 mpg | 37.2 mpg | 87% | |
| 1.8 | 39.8 mpg | 33.5 mpg | 84% | |
| 1.8 FFV | 39.8 mpg | 30.9 mpg | 78% | |
| 1.8 TDCi | 52.3 mpg | 46.0 mpg | 88% | |
| 1.8 TDCi 115 | 52.3 mpg | 47.6 mpg | 91% | |
| 2.0 | 35.3–38.7 mpg | 32.6 mpg | 88% | |
| 2.0 Automatic | 35.3 mpg | 27.1 mpg | 77% | |
| 2.0 TDCi | 48.7–49.5 mpg | 46.4 mpg | 94% | |
| 2.0 TDCi 110 | 47.1 mpg | - | - | |
| 2.0 TDCi 110 PowerShift | 47.1 mpg | - | - | |
| 2.0 TDCi 135 PowerShift | 47.9 mpg | 41.3 mpg | 86% | |
Our Fuel Cost Calculator shows you which will be the best choice for you.
Compare the running costs of petrol, diesel and electric cars to make the right choice for you.
Read the Honest John review...
-
Ford C-MAX (2003 - 2010)
Best entry and egress of any car anywhere. Excellent front seat comfort.
Rivals
| Ford C-MAX (2003 - 2010) | 40.6 | avg mpg |
| Citroen C4 SpaceTourer (2018 on) | 43.5 | avg mpg |
| BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (2022 on) | 0.0 | avg mpg |
| Mercedes-Benz B-Class (2019 on) | 0.0 | avg mpg |
.jpg)
.jpg)
