One in five Brits call for city centre SUV ban as 'carspreading' fears grow

‘Plus-sized’ SUVs are more dangerous to pedestrians than smaller vehicles, say one in three Brits – and a fifth believe they should be banned altogether from busy areas such as city centres.

A third of Brits would also support raising VED road tax on SUVs.

The survey of more than 1000 UK motorists by road safety charity IAM RoadSmart found that many Brits believe SUVs are a greater risk to cyclists than smaller cars, too.

However, despite their perceived threat to other road users, drivers’ embrace of SUVs is understandable from a personal safety perspective. The research found that more than half think SUV occupants are safer than those in smaller vehicles.

Indeed, this is backed up by Euro NCAP crash safety testing, which rates SUVs as among the safest family cars on the road.

“Huge cars were once associated with the USA but car spreading is alive and well in the UK,” says IAM RoadSmart policy and standards director Nicholas Lyes.

“Despite the fact that these cars are growing, both in size and popularity, our roads and parking spaces are not significantly wider and something needs to give.”

While no council has yet banned SUVs, some have increased parking fees for them. Cardiff, for example, has recently approved the principle of additional charges for residential parking permits for vehicles weighing more than 2.4 tonnes.

The move would follow Paris which, in 2024, tripled parking charges for heavier cars. Mayor Anne Hidalgo argued that SUVs are both dangerous and bad for the environment.

2025 research by Imperial College London concluded that pedestrians or cyclists hit by an SUV are more likely to be killed or seriously injured than if they were hit by a smaller car.

The odds of being killed increase 44% for adults and 82% for children and cyclists.

IAM RoadSmart says it would like to see more considerate SUV design, including bumpers and bonnets that reduce injury severity plus advanced pedestrian automatic emergency braking.

The road safety charity also called for greater awareness from drivers “who should be in control and have a greater spatial understanding of their vehicle... particularly on rural roads and in busy urban environments.

“While cities may opt for charges or hiking parking feels to discourage use, our view is that safer vehicle design and enhanced driver education can make the biggest difference,” says Lyes.

SUV sales continue to increase despite the risks. In 2023, they comprised almost half of new car sales globally, compared to just 15% in 2010.

Ask HJ

If I stop to let pedestrians cross at a box junction will I be liable for a penalty?

There is a new box junction near me. If I cannot clear it and stop to allow pedestrians to cross when turning right or left into the road (under the new Highway Code rules) will I be liable to a penalty? The road is busy so there are times when it's not possible to wait outside the box until the junction is clear of pedestrians. Or should I just avoid turning left or right into the road! Any vehicle following me and also in the box would of course be liable.
Potentially there is a gap in the Highway Code between the requirement to stay out of a box junction unless your exit is clear (unless turning right) and the requirement to give way to pedestrians. However, the rule for box junctions is a law stating 'you must not' whereas the rule for giving way to pedestrians is guidance prefaced by the term 'you should', which suggests the former is potentially open to prosecution whereas the latter is less likely. Ultimately it is a matter of using your judgement in the situation - you could enter the box junction with your exit appearing to be clear only for a pedestrian to start crossing, and it would seem unreasonable to be punished for avoiding a collision.
Answered by David Ross
More Questions