Suzuki Liana MOT Results

Registered in 2003
50.3% pass rate
from 304 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Liana is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (93% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.99% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.3% fail on Springs
      • 5.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.3% fail on Coil spring
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.99% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.99% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.33% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.99% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.33% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.33% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.6% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Plate brake tester (11 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (15 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.99% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.99% fail on Rbt
          • 0.99% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.66% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.66% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.33% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.33% fail on Cable
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.3% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.33% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.33% fail on Valves
    • 0.99% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.99% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.33% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 16% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 16% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 16% fail on Spark ignition (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 9.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.33% fail on Non catalyst emissions
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (68% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 12% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 11% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 11% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Prop shafts (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.66% fail on Pipe (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Tank
      • 0.33% fail on Hose
    • 0.33% fail on Chassis
      • 0.33% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.33% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.33% fail on Body
      • 0.33% fail on Panel
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.33% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.33% fail on Door condition
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.99% fail on Headlamp aim (75% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.33% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.33% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.33% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 8.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.99% fail on Size/type
  • 8.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
  • 3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.66% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.66% fail on Condition
      • 0.33% fail on Requirements
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.99% fail on Steering (78% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Steering linkage components (80% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering
      • 0.33% fail on Other components
  • 0.66% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.66% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.66% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.66% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages