Hyundai i10 MOT Results

Registered in 2017
88.1% pass rate
from 23,983 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i10 is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.3% fail on Visibility (16% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers (12% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (36% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on View to rear
      • 0.042% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.017% fail on Condition of glass (74% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Windscreen (74% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 2.9% fail on Brakes (38% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (38% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.0042% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0083% fail on Lever
        • 0.0042% fail on Cable
    • 1.0% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.083% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.0042% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0042% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.38% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.0083% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.0083% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0083% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.075% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.017% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.046% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.033% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.021% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.0042% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.038% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (140% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Parking brake control (73% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Lever (67% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (80% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0083% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.0042% fail on Pedal
    • 0.013% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0042% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 2.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (25% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.0083% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (81% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.23% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.029% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.14% fail on Headlamps (72% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp (73% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0042% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (52% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.013% fail on Horn
      • 0.0042% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.0083% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0083% fail on Switch
    • 0.0083% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0083% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.0083% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0083% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.0042% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.0042% fail on Position lamp
  • 1.8% fail on Tyres (47% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth (27% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Size/type (73% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.85% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Steering gear (32 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Steering rack (33 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Steering linkage components (71% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0083% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0042% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0042% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.0083% fail on Power steering
      • 0.0083% fail on Other components (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.19% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (66% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Exhaust emissions (70% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Spark ignition (50% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (62% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Catalyst emissions (53% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.0042% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.0042% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.029% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.029% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.18% fail on Suspension (79% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.054% fail on Anti-roll bars (60% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joints (80% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0042% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.0042% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.029% fail on Suspension arms (87% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0083% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.0083% fail on Ball joint (89% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Wheel bearings (70% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0083% fail on Springs (98% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0083% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0042% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.0042% fail on Mounting
    • 0.0083% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0083% fail on Ball joint dust cover (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0042% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0042% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0042% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (54% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.038% fail on Seats
      • 0.033% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0042% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.033% fail on Body
      • 0.021% fail on Other body component
      • 0.013% fail on Panel
    • 0.017% fail on Transmission (84% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Drive shafts (83% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Joints (82% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0083% fail on Undertray
    • 0.0042% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.0042% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0042% fail on Pipe
  • 0.12% fail on Identification of the vehicle (43% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Registration plates (43% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.079% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (67% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Seat belts (59% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0042% fail on Requirements
    • 0.029% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (72% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.021% fail on Road Wheels (87% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0083% fail on Attachment (92% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.0042% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0042% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai i10 (2014 - 2019)
    Stylish, good quality interior. Roomier and more mature than its predecessor. Refined for a small car and decent to drive.

    Search Good Garages