A car that's been driven to station or shops and done 5,000 miles in a year needs a service probably even more than one that's done 20,000 in the year.
Why? OK, I'm biting......is this just old school (american) thinking?
Assuming a recent model car with a modern engine (designed/revised in the last 5 years) and lets assume its a petrol car (as diesels have known problems with/because of DPF's) and the minimum journey length is say 1 mile.
Using a good quality modern synthetic with "long life" specs (usually 20k/2years for petrol engines), lubrication and oil quality should not be an issue, even if fuel economy is. Modern injection systems are so tightly controlled and with conventional port injection I dont think bore wash should be a problem and I've never seen water in oil problems since the days of British Leyland engines.
Only thing that may suffer significantly could be exhaust systems although modern CAT design/placement means they heat up really quickly. Servicing more regularly cant fix that problem anyway.
In fact as most servicing is purely an oil and filter change, are you saying that a top quality synthetic oil breaks down far quicker with an infrequently used / low annual mileage car, that just doesnt make sense, and I'm sure Mobil,Castrol et al would beg to differ.
I often cringe at the noise made by engines for 5 seconds or so after a filter change when there is no oil pressure whatsoever. I'm pretty sure there's more damage done there than 100 cold starts.
Edited by brum on 19/01/2013 at 16:51
|