|
My Brother went on one and the main messge rammed home was a real-life case study of someone on the A13 doing 50 in a 40 zone at 2 in the a.m. and someone who was completely drunk staggered out in front of his car and was knocked down dead.
Because the guy was 'speeding' he got 5 years for causing death by dangerous driving - which is hardly fair really as the drunk was mostly to blame - but that was kind of the point, to ram home the message that If you speed you run the risk of being being found at fault whatever the true circumstances.
NB that is was not the issue that had he not been speeding he might have avoided the drunk if he'd been doing 40 - the prosecution were under no obligation to prove that
|