Discovery - In the Guardian..... - oldroverboy

Nice story abot a Guardian reader who paid the AA £260 for an inspection of a 10 year old disco, and found it had faults that would cost £2000ish to put right. WHAT.... ONLY £2000

Discovery - In the Guardian..... - unthrottled

What's a Guardian Reader doing with a Disco??

Discovery - In the Guardian..... - Oli rag

I suspect if you looked over a quite a few ten year old cars with a fine toothed comb, you would end up with a long list of potentially expensive problems, then again not so much of a surprise on a land rover if reliability surveys are to be believed.

Discovery - In the Guardian..... - bazza

It amazes me that folk are so easily parted with their money, £4500 for a 10 year old Discovery, someone saw them coming. It's so easy these days to do a little research before any large purchase, 5 mins on the internet owners forums would have convinced them there are better buys out there. As for the Disco, a friend has just bought an 05 reg from main dealer, and it's an absolute dog, £1500 brake servo bill already plus electric handbrake failure, he's only had it 3 months. Similar story in the street here, with a neighbour. And then you read the popular mags and they can't stop raving about them, then in the same mag's reliability surveys they are languishing at the bottom as usual!

Discovery - In the Guardian..... - jamie745

Guardian reader....Disco.....the World has gone mad....

Discovery - In the Guardian..... - OG

Probably needs it to collect the organic veg from the farmers' market.

Discovery - In the Guardian..... - madf

A Guradian reader - if typical will be intelligent

and have little common sense.

Discovery - In the Guardian..... - bonzo dog

What's a Guardian Reader doing with a Disco??

Funniest comment i've read this month: well done!!!

Discovery - In the Guardian..... - Carole4X4
Can't see what all the fuss is about with LR.
I have a 97 p reg disco and it's totally reliable, quite average economy for the size/weight etc at approx 27 mpg urban and 32-34 mpg on a run at 60mph. It's comfortable, loads of space and servicing items plus spares when needed are 'cheap as chips'. A good, sorry an excellent local LR Indy garage completes the job.
This is my second disco ( no the first one didn't break down but as it was fully off road modified and we lost our driveway when we moved the ins co wouldn't insure it to be parked in our residents only area) and the first as as reliable as the new one I have.

Maybe it's. It refined liked a BMW X5 or Xtrail or even a Shogun but it will go absolutely anywhere, anytime and in any weather, starts first time every time, and has no dpf, egr, dmf problems to worry it. Best £2000 I ever spent and I've had vehicles worth much more than that, our notability qashqai is worth about 8 times that but I prefer the disco anyday.
Discovery - In the Guardian..... - jamie745

I think the fuss with Land Rover stems from the British Leyland years. The Range Rover was designed by a man called Charles Spencer King who was a very clever, forward thinking engineer. Unfortunately the items in his blueprints went on to be built by useless monkeys who were always on strike, so the cars were never as good as they should've been. Sure, good ones got through the net but unreliability has been long attached to the brand.

Discovery - In the Guardian..... - gordonbennet

You can't really blame LR factory workers (or indeed BL workers) for designing/approving a chassis that rusted through in short order due to the poor paint procedures, or aluminium panels reacting similarly, nor did they design gearboxes with a short in service useable life..and they certainly didn't authorise stickers to be applied to auto gearboxes informing that they were sealed for life...ho ho ho...what a wheeze.

My problem with LR is that they have never managed to put a proper Diesel engine in till the V8 lump arrived...that really is an addictive engine.;), Disco 3 and 4 (and RR sport which is a Disco in a short frock) weigh in at 2.7 tons, that needs a proper engine to get rolling, the 2.7 simply wasn't up to it needing lots of revs leading to serious clutch wear, the 3.0 is a little better but still lacks low revved grunt IMHO.

Meanwhile, Toyota has had the Diesel 4.2 6 pot in NA and TD form for years, now upped to 4.5 V8, and only fitted the 3 litre td (4cyl 750cc per cyl so fantastic torque from low revs) to lighter models since early 90's, ISTR some older Landcruisers in other markets having 4 litre 4 cyl petrol engines, you could probably have direct drive with that lump.

LR have no problem selling cars though, they have the badge and the kudos for those who want or need it, and the likes of TG and other comedy media on side, to be fair the big stuff do at least look the part which is what its all about in the market they pursue.

Discovery - In the Guardian..... - RT

Land-Rovers simply don't sell in any significant numbers in markets where reliability is important - only one reason for that.

4wd mid-size pick-ups have huge sales in North America, Australia and the UK business markets - they have two simple requirements, body-on-frame construction and reliability. The fact that Land-Rover is a minor player in that segment says it all.

In North America and Australia, ordinary buyers have public access to wild land requiring a capable, reliable vehicle - Land-Rover may have the capability but certainly not the reliability.

Edited by RT on 13/08/2012 at 10:22