Some poor argument here.
“...you think I'm moaning. No again, just making observations just like you lot do over there about HJ.” This is disingenuous. You are certainly doing more than “making observations” when you refer to “the dyed in the wool right wingers that control that particular forum” or “They always raise issues around and against left of centre support, anti union, anti local government, public pensions and the like.” That seems very much like sniping from the side-lines to me, not mere observation.
“You cherry picked a couple of nicer posts...” I was trying to show that there was a more balanced discussion than you seem to believe possible.
“Who are you over there then? Too shy to post on both with same name.” This is quite amusing, coming from someone who has strong views about the other place, but is (it seems) “too shy” to post anything there!
“Whenever I stick up for this site, when other sites slag it off...” so you do have an agenda – it’s not just about “making observations”. And why stick up for HJ here? You’re preaching to the converted – do it over there, where it counts.
“...you always seem to be the only one from there to jump on me.” Maybe it’s something to do with what you say and the way you say it.
Yes, I am FocalPoint on the other site. I don’t see why I have to have the same name here as there. Perhaps you would care to check the kind of posts I make “over there”. I try to be thoughtful and sympathetic on internet forums and elsewhere, but I one thing I can’t abide is people who don’t seem able to look at themselves.
Probably this thread will get locked soon, or deleted, and that will be no great loss. It’s a pity it was even started.
Enough.
|