Hi all
First post so please bear with me. I've been looking at reviews online and am more confused than ever - I can google with the best of them so this question isn't out of research laziness....
I'm looking for a small SUV that can get through maybe a bit of light snow. TBH it's the interior space I'm looking for as much as anything else, I drive a saloon at the moment and find it inflexible. I want something that isn't painfully slow, and is reasonable to maintain, so I'm not interested in Freelanders, which seem to have a high number of 'Friday cars'. I have a limited purchase budget but can afford to service and maintain, within reason. I like the mk1 Honda CRV, but I've seen a few Ford Mavericks that look good value too. I'm looking at the 2.0 Zetec Maverick, the same car as the Mazda Tribute, not the Nissan Terrano version.
There are more Hondas to choose from, as the Maverick was only on sale for a couple of years and wasn't popular, but the Maverick is shorter (which is important to me as I have to park on the street and my current 190E is long enough!) I also think the 2.0 Zetec is a pretty good engine for a Ford. Hondas have an excellent reputation for reliability, but most in my price bracket don't have full service history, and none have Honda history, which I was led to believe is key - as they need to be maintained using OEM fluids, etc.
I prefer the styling of the Maverick and it has more space inside, plus it doesn't have a tailgate-mounted spare.
Is this a no-brainer? Should I stick with the tried and tested Honda and just look for a good one or is the Maverick a contender? US sites show opinions on the CRV Mk1 vs the equivalent Ford Escape as being pretty equally divided, with the Ford being slightly better in the rough stuff due to having a dash button to lock the 4x4. I don't know how much use that'd get - I'm not an offroad person, I just want something with space that'll get me to work when the weather is bad (and figure that spring is a good time to look!)
The issue with the US websites is that they invariably compare the 2.0 CRV (auto or manual) with the 3.0 V6 Escape/Maverick, and I'm looking for a 2.0 manual Maverick .(Although it's a shame the 2.0 doesn't get leather like the 3.0).
Part of me wants someone to tell me the Ford is a decent prospect, because it appeals more, but if the CRV is a vastly better car, or even just a noticeably better car, then I'd be mad to go for the chunky styling over quality.
Any opinions gratefully received and thank you for reading my post!
|