any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

After a brief hiatus, Peter Rodgers is back again. This time the sage is concerned about cyclists. As with most IAM advice much that is trite and much that it true, but what is true is trite, and what was is not trite is not true.

There's the usual stuff about not cutting-up cyclists while turning left etc, but the point I take exception to is the advice to overtake gently because it makes the cyclist feel safer.

In the real world, the more gently you intend to overtake, the fewer overtaking opportunities there are. This means that you spend more time sitting behind the cylclist waiting to overtake. As a cyclist, I can say that this is much more disconcerting that a swift overtaking manoeuvre. The only thing I would ask is that overtaking drivers don't hold onto second gear any longer than necessary-engines are much louder outside the car than inside the insulated cabin!

any - More IAM advice! - dadbif
Having just been stuck behind a bunch (peleton?) of b***** Spanish cyclists for 6 km's with no chance of passing, the b******s fill the road, I have no sympathy, if I could get away with it I would grind the lot into the Tarmac !

Rant over

No it isn't, they are uninsured, untaxed and a wart on the buttock of road going humanity
any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

Where they riding two abreast? That is very selfish.

I find horses a much bigger problem. They are slow and take up a lot of space. Drivers are supposed to be understanding of the unpredictable nature of horses. Why do people feel the need to take these oversized, temperamental quadrupeds onto the road??

any - More IAM advice! - Dutchie

How often are you stuck behind Spanish cyclist dad.Once in a blue moon? Calm down and keep taking the tablets.>:)

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

I would've thought a long line of traffic breathing down your neck at 4mph would make the cyclist feel worse. I just boot it round them at the first available gap.

any - More IAM advice! - sb10

I would've thought a long line of traffic breathing down your neck at 4mph would make the cyclist feel worse. I just boot it round them at the first available gap.

These cyclists seem to do there utmost to annoy drivers no matter where they are riding,ie where they are supposed to use cycle lanes,well I dont remember seeing one use them,they would rather ride on the road, dodging humps and drain holes than the smoother cycle lanes (which cost us a fortune) put in specially for them,I am in favour of the overtake quickly if you get the chance

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

I prefer it when cyclists ride on the path to be honest. They dont have mirrors or indicators and they're horribly unpredictable. A car is going to go one of a few ways, you can plan for it but a bicyclist who's legally allowed on the highway with no training, licences or tests can do anything.

any - More IAM advice! - Leif

I prefer it when cyclists ride on the path to be honest. They dont have mirrors or indicators and they're horribly unpredictable. A car is going to go one of a few ways, you can plan for it but a bicyclist who's legally allowed on the highway with no training, licences or tests can do anything.

Yes but have you seen the paths? More often than not pedestrians walk in them, and when you reach a road, you have to stop, and give way to cars. So you make slow progress, and risk being knocked off by day dreaming pedestrians. That is why I used the road not cycle paths. I once had a motorist scream abuse at me not using the cycle path. He then drove so close to me that It scared me. A nasty unpleasant man he was. I gave him an earful at the lights. The truth is that cyclists and horse riders have a right to use the roads, and drivers have a duty to respect that right, even when it is frustrating. Yes, some/many cyclists are reckless and arrogant, and when a group of cyclists are wheel to wheel in a long line they destroy the road for other users. I can understand anger at that, and really that is very arrogant on their part as they must know the impact of their behaviour.

any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

The truth is that cyclists and horse riders have a right to use the roads

I wish the latter didn't. They are a real pain and should only be transported by horsebox.

any - More IAM advice! - Leif

The truth is that cyclists and horse riders have a right to use the roads

I wish the latter didn't. They are a real pain and should only be transported by horsebox.

What an arrogant statement. So when the horserider comes to the end of the bridleway, and reaches a country lane, they have to load the horse into a box? The truth is that they have a right to use country lanes. And when I am driving around country lanes I cannot see any reason why horses should not be there.

any - More IAM advice! - RT

The truth is that cyclists and horse riders have a right to use the roads

I wish the latter didn't. They are a real pain and should only be transported by horsebox.

The roads were built for horses!

We're only allowed on them as a concession - purpose-built highways (motorways) do ban horses, etc

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

The roads were built for horses!

We're only allowed on them as a concession - purpose-built highways (motorways) do ban horses, etc

The roads being built for horses dates back to when we kept black people as slaves. I'm not entirely sure we should apply rules of that age to the 21st century. So the horses can get out of the way! :)

any - More IAM advice! - mss1tw
uninsured, untaxed

VED Band A and 3rd party insurance through the CTC when I was last a regular cyclist.

Sorry to spoil your rant.

any - More IAM advice! - Bromptonaut

Surely this is not meant as advice to the IAM membership but is for general consumption. Intended to be picked on by the national and regional press giving them some free content and the IAM some free publicity. The stuff about turning left may seem trite but 'left hooks' happen daily. Was nearly taken out on Tuesday by a BMW who shot just after lights only to turn down a side street ten yards in front

Like UT though I'm a bit dubious about the overtaking advice. Wide and slow is best where traffice and visibililty permit but wide and swift is often OK. Close and fast is the no no. Once I've ascertained that the motorist is holding back patiently I'm OK with him in whatever gear. The French are very good at this but like Dutchie down thread they live in a culture where cycling is regarded as a normal activity rather than a wart on the bum of society.

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

Surely this is not meant as advice to the IAM membership but is for general consumption. Intended to be picked on by the national and regional press giving them some free content and the IAM some free publicity.

You cannot call yourself the Institute of Advanced Motorists and then proceed to give rather basic advice on basic - not advanced - issues. It just makes them look like morons.

any - More IAM advice! - Leif

Surely this is not meant as advice to the IAM membership but is for general consumption. Intended to be picked on by the national and regional press giving them some free content and the IAM some free publicity.

You cannot call yourself the Institute of Advanced Motorists and then proceed to give rather basic advice on basic - not advanced - issues. It just makes them look like morons.

Something tells me you have already formed your own opinion of the IAM. They give advanced driving lessons, but it is a sad fact that they do feel the need to offer basic advice to the general motorist. And I would say that it is needed. But most drivers do seem safe in relation to cyclists, and those that are dangerous are unlikely to listen to the IAM, so in the sense they are weeing in the wind.

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

They give advanced driving lessons,

Oh its that time of year again is it.

Perhaps I should try asking the following question for the 147th time on the HJ Backroom as the previous 146 have failed to yield an answer.

What do they teach which is advanced?

any - More IAM advice! - Leif

They give advanced driving lessons,

Oh its that time of year again is it.

Perhaps I should try asking the following question for the 147th time on the HJ Backroom as the previous 146 have failed to yield an answer.

What do they teach which is advanced?

They produce a book which will tell you what they teach. But there is a lot of useful stuff. Such as using gears more effectively, including block changes, and changing down to a low gear and declutching as you approach a red light, keeping a safe distance (obvious perhaps, but ignored by most road users), how to test that your rear brake lights work, why you shoud brake when slowing down, using brakes to slow, not gears, using the hand brake better (not making it click loudly) and so on. This is not advanced in the sense of police driving, but it is above the standard driving test, and it is useful. I have avoided some nasty scrapes thanks to IAM tuition, and I very rarely have incidents, which I think is due to the guidance I received. I sue the gears much more effectively too. No doubt some of the information is pointless, such as doing a three point turn without bumping the kerb, for goodness sake who cares other than a pensioner with a string of IAM awards.

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

Such as using gears more effectively, including block changes, and changing down to a low gear and declutching as you approach a red light,

Standard stuff, not advanced.

keeping a safe distance

Covered on first driving lesson before you're allowed to drive on a back road. Just because so many people drive at towing length distance on the motorway doesnt mean keeping a safe distance is 'advanced.' Its just rare.

how to test that your rear brake lights work,

Pretty obvious isnt it?!

why you shoud brake when slowing down, using brakes to slow, not gears,

Instructors haven't taught the 'use gears to slow down' method for about 20 years.

using the hand brake better

And people pay for these lessons?

but it is above the standard driving test

You haven't listed anything which isn't covered by an ordinary driving instructor.

I have avoided some nasty scrapes thanks to IAM tuition

Then you were obviously a terrible driver to start with and despite your claims to the contrary, you are still not advanced.

and I very rarely have incidents

Same here and I've never had IAM tuition. Does that mean I'm just a better driver than you?

No doubt some of the information is pointless, such as doing a three point turn without bumping the kerb

They still teach three point turns? Everybody else changed it to 'turn in the road' years ago upon discovery of the fact you cannot do it in three points on a very narrow road.

any - More IAM advice! - Leif

Such as using gears more effectively, including block changes, and changing down to a low gear and declutching as you approach a red light,

Standard stuff, not advanced.

No it isn't. The standard instruction covers more basic information. And people tend to forget or ignore what they learn as the years pass, and they slip into bad habits.

keeping a safe distance

Covered on first driving lesson before you're allowed to drive on a back road. Just because so many people drive at towing length distance on the motorway doesnt mean keeping a safe distance is 'advanced.' Its just rare.

Getting people back into a good habit is not a bad thing.

how to test that your rear brake lights work,

Pretty obvious isnt it?!

Not really. Add in lots of little things like that and you get useful knowledge.

why you shoud brake when slowing down, using brakes to slow, not gears,

Instructors haven't taught the 'use gears to slow down' method for about 20 years.

Nonsense. Some instructors do not even know why it is bad to engine brake.

using the hand brake better

And people pay for these lessons?

I've been in plenty of cars with drivers who make the handbrake click away merrily. It is only a small example, but not useless.

but it is above the standard driving test

You haven't listed anything which isn't covered by an ordinary driving instructor.

Nonsense.

I have avoided some nasty scrapes thanks to IAM tuition

Then you were obviously a terrible driver to start with and despite your claims to the contrary, you are still not advanced.

You do express youself in a very direct, arrogant and aggressive manner., with some nice put downs I was an okay driver before taking IAM lessons, according to the instructor. I made no claims to be an advanced driver, so don't put words into my mouth.

and I very rarely have incidents

Same here and I've never had IAM tuition. Does that mean I'm just a better driver than you?

That is a pointless statement. I know nothing about you, and vice versa. Do you know why so called advanced driving came about?

No doubt some of the information is pointless, such as doing a three point turn without bumping the kerb

They still teach three point turns? Everybody else changed it to 'turn in the road' years ago upon discovery of the fact you cannot do it in three points on a very narrow road.

I disagree with almost everything you have said. The driving test is about giving someone basic proficiency. IAM tuition does not get anywhere near police advanced driving - so I am told - but it does go beyong the basic driving test. I've been in more than a few cars with people who openly describe themselves as very good drivers, and been scared stiff by appalling driving. Whether or not you describe IAM tuition as advanced is irrelevent, given that there are more than a few people who could benefit from their teaching. And having someone sit next to you and observe your driving is not a bad thing.

Have you actually read the IAM book? Or similar books?

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

Getting people back into a good habit is not a bad thing.

Its not advanced either.

Nonsense. Some instructors do not even know why it is bad to engine brake.

You must know some pretty bad instructors. Just because some instructors dont teach basic things properly doesnt mean those basic things are advanced.

I've been in plenty of cars with drivers who make the handbrake click away merrily. It is only a small example, but not useless.

I dont use mine at all because I am really advanced.

You do express youself in a very direct, arrogant and aggressive manner.

Thank you.

Do you know why so called advanced driving came about?

Gotta sell those magazines somehow.

but it does go beyong the basic driving test.

You've still not provided any facts to suggest that is the case.

Whether or not you describe IAM tuition as advanced is irrelevent

Its quite relevent, given the title 'Institute of Advanced Motorists' I think its quite relevent indeed. So much so actually that its in the name!

And having someone sit next to you and observe your driving is not a bad thing.

Agreed. If only we could have some sort of compulsory system whereby that happened to all prospective motorists. Imagine the possibilities.

any - More IAM advice! - Leif

It looks like we must disagree.

Getting people back into a good habit is not a bad thing.

Its not advanced either.

Nonsense. Some instructors do not even know why it is bad to engine brake.

You must know some pretty bad instructors. Just because some instructors dont teach basic things properly doesnt mean those basic things are advanced.

I've been in plenty of cars with drivers who make the handbrake click away merrily. It is only a small example, but not useless.

I dont use mine at all because I am really advanced.

You do express youself in a very direct, arrogant and aggressive manner.

Thank you.

Do you know why so called advanced driving came about?

Gotta sell those magazines somehow.

Maybe you should do some research and find out. Hint: The UK police started it.

but it does go beyong the basic driving test.

You've still not provided any facts to suggest that is the case.

Whether or not you describe IAM tuition as advanced is irrelevent

Its quite relevent, given the title 'Institute of Advanced Motorists' I think its quite relevent indeed. So much so actually that its in the name!

Whether or not you think they teach advanced techniques is completely irrelevent, unless you know what you are talking about e.g. you are a certified advanced driver e.g. police class 1.

And having someone sit next to you and observe your driving is not a bad thing.

Agreed. If only we could have some sort of compulsory system whereby that happened to all prospective motorists. Imagine the possibilities.

What an idiotic remark.

Edited by Leif on 22/04/2012 at 23:19

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

Your partner may be petite but still needs to be comfortable, so you need to try the various options out and see which gives her what she needs

I need to be a police driver to point out block gear changing isn't advanced? What a weird world you live in.

any - More IAM advice! - NARU
The French are very good at this but like Dutchie down thread they live in a culture where cycling is regarded as a normal activity rather than a wart on the bum of society.

The rule in France is that the car driver is assumed to be the guilty party unless its proved otherwise.

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

The rule in France is that the car driver is assumed to be the guilty party unless its proved otherwise.

Yes well the French are peasants and communists so they would have ridiculous rules like that. In a democratic society nobody is presumed to be guilty for anything. In France even if they cannot prove the motorist is at fault he gets charged. Stalin would be proud of such regimes.

It should be up to the courts and police to prove the car drivers guilt, not the motorists responsibility to prove his/her innocence.

Edited by jamie745 on 21/04/2012 at 16:17

any - More IAM advice! - Leif

Like UT though I'm a bit dubious about the overtaking advice. Wide and slow is best where traffice and visibililty permit but wide and swift is often OK. Close and fast is the no no.

I would say that close is a no no irrespective of the speed. If you hit a pot hole, or get caught in wind, then it is too easy to wobble and hit the car. I agree that wide and fast is fine. Quite a few local drivers will go too close to me when I am running on country lanes. It is not pleasant, and most of the time there is absolutely no reason to be close.

any - More IAM advice! - 1litregolfeater

It is a problem, a clash of cultures, we have a lot of motorists with no appreciation of cycling these days, unfortunately.

Car drivers who've never rode a bike!

Until about 1980 people were poor and most people had been on a bike at some point.

Then with universal affluence came driving for all, and all manner of ungainly frames clamberered off the sofa and into the driving seat.

any - More IAM advice! - Trilogy
No point in arguing with jamie about the IAM test, he's never taken it, but knows all about it!!!!!
any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

Then with universal affluence came driving for all, and all manner of ungainly frames clamberered off the sofa and into the driving seat.

I'm led to believe that the working classes refer to sofas as "couches" or "settees". Come off it, the average age of a first time car (or house buyer for that matter) has risen steadily over recent years. There isn't universal affluence. Besides lots of peole (like me) ride for recreation.

Not everything was harder in your day!

any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

I'm going to start a rival organisation to promote road safety and awareness-Sophisticated Horseriding And Motoring.

Top tips.

Horses

1. If you intend to take your horse onto the road, it is essential that the mount the horse correctly and adopt a secure riding position. To do this, use the head of your horse as Point of Reference. Make sure that the head is in front of you. If the head is behind you then you have mounted the horse backwards and you will not be able to see where you are going. You must alight from the quadruped and remount.

Left Hand Turns.

When negotiating Left Hand turns in a motor vehicle, you must ensure that the trajectory of the vehicle follows your intended path. Failure to turn the steering wheel sufficiently will result in the car following an arc that is too wide. Conversely, turning the steering wheel too far will cause the vehicle to turn to sharply and possibly hit the kerb. To ensure that the vehicle turns the corner as intended, you must turn the steering wheel by just the right amount.

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

Usually these cycling discussions are filled with 'oh, poor cyclist' as the blame is squarely put onto the motorist but lets have a reality check. Most cyclists are a hazard. A few months ago I was driving home from work and theres a left turn I take at traffic lights, the house on the corner has such a massive wall around the garden that you cant see whats round the bend until you're round. The light is green so I go left and this pleb on a bicycle with a girl on his back is coming towards me on the wrong side of the road. A pensioner might've not reacted but I did and whilst making his way to the opposite side of the road he gives hand signals and refers to me as - apologies to Avant - a f***ing t*** 'innit.'

Now if I'd smashed into him the local paper would be full of 'oh dear poor cyclist' and emotional requests from his mother to ban all cars from the entire world as well as made up stories from the school about how he was such a lovely boy as i'm apparently a guest in the sixth formers tarmac playground.

Edited by jamie745 on 22/04/2012 at 16:11

any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

Ah, you need to consult the Sophisticated Horseriding And Motoring society for advice on left hand turns. As CEO, I am happy to conduct an audit on your driving for only £7458.99 (+VAT). Can you afford not to?

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

It would appear your monthly magazine would be entitled SHAM. Co-incidence?

any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

Is it? I hadn't noticed.

any - More IAM advice! - Avant

Can we all contribute to the SHAM manual?

CYCLING

Remember that the machine that you have chosen to ride has only two wheels. This means that if you stop and fail to put a foot on the ground, you will fall off. If you fall off in the road, a car driver may not be able to stop in time (if he is driving an elderly Jaguar, he may not want to).

It is inadvisable to turn right. Go left, left and left again. If you insist in doing so, and pull out into the centre of the road, there is just a chance that a car may be behind you. Be innovative for a cyclist and attempt to look round.

You have something in common with some BMW 3-series in that your vehicle is not equipped with indicators. You must use your arm to make a signal. Ten extra points if in doing so you hit another cyclist in the face.

(Tongue firmly in cheek - no offence intended.)

any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

SHAM is based on the wikipedia model-all contrubtions welcome.

You have something in common with some BMW 3-series in that your vehicle is not equipped with indicators.

They're an optional extra on the base 3 series but come as standard on the Special Equipment versions. :)

It is inadvisable to turn right. Go left, left and left again.

I've done this before! What's wrong with it?

any - More IAM advice! - TeeCee

but come as standard on the Special Equipment versions.

Must be made by Lucas as they never work.....

any - More IAM advice! - Engineer Andy

I think quite a lot of what the IAM says is quite obvious to most of us, but realistically how many of can honestly say that we've never cut it a bit close when overtaking a cyclist, especially if we were in a bit of a hurry?

I do agree that cyclists (and other slower road users [I'll come to them in a moment]) should be both more aware and more considerate of other traffic - as a cyclist myself, I make sure that I look over my shoulder reasonably often, even pulling over when I can see a long line of traffic behind headed by a lorry or other large vehicle. I suppose I can afford to do so, as I'm only a leisure cyclist, not a "hard-core" one with all the "tour de France" garb and £2000 bike. I even signal to the vehicle behind to overtake and deliberately back off to make it easier. A shame others can't do the same - it would only delay them for a few seconds and reduce the likelihood of an accident.

Horses are a different kettle of fish all together - I know some riders think they own the road, but most are fine, and it's worth remembering that horses are very easily spooked, so its always best to keep a reasonable distance.

IMHO the worst are scooter/moped riders - I come across several on my way into work (along deristicted "B" roads), and they have an annoying habit of constantly drifting from one side of the lane to the other, and of course at 30-40mph, which makes overtaking very difficult and sometimes downright dangerous. I'm not saying they shouldn't ride at that speed (many are likely restricted to 40mph or so), but it would be nowhere near as bad if they just kept as reasonably close to the kerb as they could, making overtaking easier for everyone.

Edited by Engineer Andy on 22/04/2012 at 20:46

any - More IAM advice! - carl233

I do not mean to sound controversial but I am thankful after spending time with the IAM and ultimately passing the test for all that they taught me. They talk allot of sense and looking at the standard of driving in the UK the roads are a huge mess and an embarrassment to any so called developed country. Driving in this country at present seems to be full of self-interest, lack of consideration and full of red mist and impatience . I am sorry to say that the standard of driving in this country is becoming more and more third world every day, the IAM are simply doing what is within their power to improve the standards of education.

any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

They talk allot of sense and looking at the standard of driving in the UK the roads are a huge mess and an embarrassment to any so called developed country.

Must be why the UK has lower accident rates than virtually any other developed country in the world-bar sweden and the Netherlands. Yes, there is bad driving, but indolence is the main problem rather than ignorance.

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

Must be why the UK has lower accident rates than virtually any other developed country in the world-bar sweden and the Netherlands. Yes, there is bad driving, but indolence is the main problem rather than ignorance.

Theres no virtually about it and our road safety record is actually better then the Netherlands. If you discount a few tiny islands which have too few cars to draw statistical analysis, only Sweden has a better road safety record currently than the United Kingdom by all measures and criterias. We are miles ahead of Spain, France, Denmark, Portugal and interestingly Austria whose recent changes to young driver laws have provoked discussion about a UK copycat, despite UK roads being twice as safe as Austrian roads. Our roads are 4 times safer than the United States, go to America if you want to see really bad driving.

I do get very annoyed with people who spout nonsense like 'the UK's roads are a huge mess and an embarassment to any so called developed country' and general fact-mangling about how the UK's roads are full of carnage - nothing more than BRAKE propaganda - when we're the second safest in the World. Also consider only 0.03% of motorists (the safest in the world) are members of the IAM.

Looks like the rest of us get on fine without them.

any - More IAM advice! - Smileyman

As the world becomes more of a global village so some traits from other countries .. either through people who moved here, or UK citizens having been overseas are being shared around.

I also consider congestion and bad (or anti car) road planning breeds frustration which breeds impatience.. the solution is not just to raise the education of the average driver but also to deal with (eradicate or minimise) the problems that they meet ....

any - More IAM advice! - barney100
Greenies love cyclists, unfortunately we don't seem to have the facilities for them that say Holland has. I do a bit of cycling but feel unsafe on the road knowing that the slightest mistake means bad news for me.
any - More IAM advice! - Trilogy

Most motorists tend to overtake cyclists as though they are not there.

Edited by Trilogy on 22/04/2012 at 23:02

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

Most motorists tend to overtake cyclists as though they are not there.

Cant blame people for some wishful thinking.

any - More IAM advice! - MikeTorque

I wish horse riders/owners would pick up the excrement that comes out of their horses exhaust. Same goes for vehicles carrying livestock with excrement & urine escaping the vehicle.

The IAM teach how to be fully aware of the environment and this includes the above mentioned hazards and avoiding contact with such substances/hazards.

While we're about it, the IAM is only one such organisation that teaches numerous skills, there many other organisations who teach driving skills such as security and anti-terrorism driving, off-road, etc. Perhaps when we've mastered the art of them all can we be described as an advanced driver.

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745

teach driving skills such as security and anti-terrorism driving

I'm sorry what?

any - More IAM advice! - Bromptonaut
I'm sorry what?

Training drivers who might be subject to terrorist type attacks or those who drive them. Not just government these days but any body who is targetted by for example anti vivisectionists. Abortion providers look like they might be in frame too

There's also a market, shared by IAM & ROSPA amongst others for teaching about managing the risks of driving for work. Far more dangerous than anything else done by the average manager or slaes rep.

any - More IAM advice! - Leif
While we're about it, the IAM is only one such organisation that teaches numerous skills, there many other organisations who teach driving skills such as security and anti-terrorism driving, off-road, etc. Perhaps when we've mastered the art of them all can we be described as an advanced driver.

Many years ago I tried to get advanced training on a paid by the hour basis, but couldn't find anyone suitable. I did IAM training, but you are reliant on unpaid volunteers, and I wanted someone with sounder qualifications who would I hope have better skills as a teacher.

any - More IAM advice! - nudger

"You cannot call yourself the Institute of Advanced Motorists and then proceed to give rather basic advice on basic - not advanced - issues. It just makes them look like morons."

Oh FFS?! Not again. How amny times does this forum get constipated with rock hard stook coming from people complaining about the IAM advice? Jamie - you are clearly a legen d behind the wheel - why do you get so worked up about the IAM telling morons advice that only a moron would need to be told? I don't think it's aimed at you because you clearly know all of this because...yes, it's very basic advice. But you must realise that a lot of people are inept behind the wheel?

The IAM does give this advice out because it is aimed at....morons! In other words, a significant number of dithering, slow driving, can't work out the rules of the road.

I am a driver and I give plenty of room to cyclists because unlike a significant majority of motorists, I've been taught how to overtake (oooh - going on the other side of the road - how dangerous!!) when the opportunity arises. Not to sit on the backside of the cyclist in a 3-series, with the veins in my temples bulging with pompous and self-righteous indignation because I can't overtake a hedgehog on a dual carriageway even though I specced my car with 19 inch really cool alloys..

I am also a cyclist - and anyone who tells me that I'm untrained and untaxed can have my two tax discs and hundreds or thousands of miles of driving inserted into eye sockets with a blistering wooden spoon. The vast majority of cyclists are drivers and when they are on their bikes, they are reducing the number of cars about for the rest of us.

And anyone who says they are holding up traffic is simply devoid of any talent behind the wheel.

Sorry.

any - More IAM advice! - nudger

"Oh its that time of year again is it. Perhaps I should try asking the following question for the 147th time on the HJ Backroom as the previous 146 have failed to yield an answer. What do they teach which is advanced?"

Jaysus - Jamie - AAAAAAAAAAARRRRGGGHHHH!

I know you are clearly love driving and cars but can you read? Can you Jamie? Can you read in English? Please tell me?

You keep asking the same questions over and over again. Is it pathological? Is it Jamie?

Why don't you just search through every post where you ask what the point of the IAM is and you will find that many people, including myself, do actually reply to you and tell you what it is the IAM actually does. Why do you have such a chip on your shoulder about them?

I don't believe for one moment that you are defensive about your own driving because I am sure that you are a good driver. I am also sure that you are extremely enthusiastic about cars and driving. But I guarantee that you are - just like me - not actually anywhere near as good as you think you are. And if you would simply try out a session or two with the IAM - with an open mind - I think you might be interested. It is not for everyone and perhaps it isn't for you but that doesn't mean that they are evil or a bad thing.

Will people try and post about interesting motoring things now instead of repeating the same foetid crap about the IAM everytime Honest John chooses to post some advice that they give?

any - More IAM advice! - concrete

Just to add my twopennyworth. I do think the IAM serves a useful purpose. It cannot do any harm to offer advanced driving techniques to those who wish to learn them. Basically they are only reinforcing common sense and trying to instil an attitude of thought before action while on the road. If you are not interested in what they say, then don't bother with them, but don't criticise them either.

Regarding the cyclists. I take great care when around cyclists, simply because no matter whose fault a collision is, they are going to come off second best. They are however their own worst enemy. I do find they are arrogant and have a holier than thou attitude towards motorists. A little bit more respect from all concerned and this situation would calm down. People would not behave the same way if on foot, they would not 'cut up' other pedestrians, block doorways etc yet many drivers think nothing of doing that in a vehicle. A bit more consideration is what is needed. If the IAM promote that, then they are doing a fine job. Best to all. Concrete

any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

How amny times does this forum get constipated with rock hard stook coming from people complaining about the IAM advice?

I can't speak on Jamie's behalf, but the reason that I get irritated by trite and banal advice from self-important, pompous gits is that it is very counter-productive.

Pressure groups are like politicians: they think that a message can never be reiterated too many times. The trouble is that the intended audience stop listening to incessant nagging. Useful information is lost in the white noise created by constant IAM communiques.

Does anyone take any notice of the 'SLOW' warnings that precede every corner on B roads? No, because if you cry wolf too often, your message is completely ignored thereafter.

any - More IAM advice! - Trilogy

Jamie, I believe you're in finance/accounts.....................your maths isn't up to much, 100,000 IAM members isn't 0.03% of motorists!

any - More IAM advice! - jamie745
Sorry. 0.3%
any - More IAM advice! - Engineer Andy

How amny times does this forum get constipated with rock hard stook coming from people complaining about the IAM advice?

I can't speak on Jamie's behalf, but the reason that I get irritated by trite and banal advice from self-important, pompous gits is that it is very counter-productive.

Pressure groups are like politicians: they think that a message can never be reiterated too many times. The trouble is that the intended audience stop listening to incessant nagging. Useful information is lost in the white noise created by constant IAM communiques.

Does anyone take any notice of the 'SLOW' warnings that precede every corner on B roads? No, because if you cry wolf too often, your message is completely ignored thereafter.

I'm often behind OAPs doing 35-40 in a (perfectly safe) 60 zone who brake whatever their speed is when the see the "SLOW" road marking - I could swear that some of them still think they're driving a Morris Minor or suchlike, rather than the Lexus/BMW/Merc they are actually driving. Poor awareness of speed in relation to road conditions & other road users (how many people slow down/give more braking room in heavy rain, espcially on fast roads?) is IMHO much worse than speed itself.

My other bugbear is drivers who come up to a junction/roundabout, and only look at the other roads around it when they've come to a grinding halt at the junction - a little bit of keeping a watchfull eye on the other roads around the junction would mean they can slow, but then enter the junction moving to suit the traffic flow, actually a help.

any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

My other bugbear is drivers who come up to a junction/roundabout, and only look at the other roads around it when they've come to a grinding halt at the junction - a little bit of keeping a watchfull eye on the other roads around the junction would mean they can slow, but then enter the junction moving to suit the traffic flow, actually a help.

Quite. It's even more infuriating if you're behind them and have looked ahead, seen the junction is clear and set your speed accordingly. Only the car in front has stopped unneccesarily, so you have to stop. Grr!

any - More IAM advice! - Bobbin Threadbare

My other bugbear is drivers who come up to a junction/roundabout, and only look at the other roads around it when they've come to a grinding halt at the junction - a little bit of keeping a watchfull eye on the other roads around the junction would mean they can slow, but then enter the junction moving to suit the traffic flow, actually a help.

Quite. It's even more infuriating if you're behind them and have looked ahead, seen the junction is clear and set your speed accordingly. Only the car in front has stopped unneccesarily, so you have to stop. Grr!

This is a bugbear I know several people have - I spotted a beautiful new Audi A6 Avant being driven at 65mph on the motorway (middle lane - grr) this afternoon. It was a 3.0l TDI. Dammit stop buying these cars if you aren't willing to drive them properly!!!

any - More IAM advice! - TeeCee
Does anyone take any notice of the 'SLOW' warnings that precede every corner on B roads? No, because if you cry wolf too often, your message is completely ignored thereafter.

Also why trucks get stuck under clearly signed bridges. That'll be because the bridge in question is one of the perishingly few where the height posted on it is somewhere near the truth, rather than the random distance greater than that which is more common.

My personal favourite, a bridge in Kings Langley, clearly marked as 10' 3" that would take a known and measured 11' 9" truck with over a foot of headroom to spare. Wolf! Wolf, wolf, wolf......

any - More IAM advice! - Bromptonaut

My personal favourite, a bridge in Kings Langley, clearly marked as 10' 3" that would take a known and measured 11' 9" truck with over a foot of headroom to spare. Wolf! Wolf, wolf, wolf......

That one go under the railway?

Even with (or I suppose perhaps because of) that margin for error it was the subject of regular bashes for years. I've lost count of the number of times, in 25 years commuting from Euston, I've been held up or turfed off trains at Watford because of an oversize truck ramming that bridge.

It's been better recently though.

any - More IAM advice! - Avant

Some people approve of what the IAM does (including me, on the grounds that any work done to improve driving standards is work worth doing). Some disagree with some of their policies, some with the whole idea of an IAM.

This discussion has been had on here several times before, and can never be conclusive. Shall we all agree to disagree, and leave it at that.

any - More IAM advice! - Bilboman

Wonderful period piece which has been posted before, but it really does take us back to a bygone, almost innocent age. Ex-military type of IAM chap driving from London to Bath with the running commentary all the way. Interesting roundabout manoeuvre, where the rule fo priority seems to be teh opposite of today's (Anyone hazard a guess as to when the give way to teh right rule was established?) And there are a curious couple of encounters with a red Herald driver which seem highly contrived. For those who haven't seen it before - enjoy!
tinyurl.com/7ncfwgt

any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

He certainly sorted out that mimser.

"There's a raker ahead (what is this?) , so I'll close up...signal with my headlights...and again. He hasn't a clue I'm here, so I'll sound the horn...and again. Yes, he's pulling in and I can go past. Giving me the V-sign-can't imagine why he thinks I'm interested in his politics"

What happened to the organisation??

any - More IAM advice! - Avant

I think his name was George Eyles - either ex-Services or ex-police or given his generation probably both. 'George' rather suits him. Some things have indeed changed since then (c. 1963 just two years before I learned to drive), but there's a lot of sound stuff in there still.

any - More IAM advice! - Bobbin Threadbare

I really enjoyed that video. Nobody speaks like that anymore! How quiet the roads were....

I do like his comments about driving decisively. 'If it's safe, do it'. I try to follow that.

any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

Apparently they never did speak like that! It was just that the sound recording equipment of the day made voices sound like that. Sorry to burst the bubble!

any - More IAM advice! - Bobbin Threadbare

People don't invent their own uppercrust accents anymore either, like the one Brian Sewell has.

any - More IAM advice! - HandCart

Do you mean: filmed at 24 fps, transferred to video at 25fps?

any - More IAM advice! - unthrottled

Quite possibly. I don't know the technical reason for the distortion. Wouldn't that mean radio broadcasts should sound more 'natural'? But if you listen to American recordings of the same era, you can hear the same clipped, nasel tone as the British ones.

Quite agree that Sewell's accent is affected.

But that trait isn't entirely confined to Upper crust wannabes. I heard an interview with Beryl Bainbridge in which she bemoaned the fact that the Liverpool accent had become an exaggerated parody of itself. Curiously, it is stronger in Runcorn, Winsford, and some parts of Flintshire, than in the home city itself!

any - More IAM advice! - HandCart

Maybe it was the similarity of the RCA model 44 and BBC Type A microphones.