|
Audis are rightfully criticised because most of them excessively under-steer and have done so for decades, that's because Audi insist on putting the engine in the "wrong" place and then try to engineer their way round poor fundamental design. Handling, grip and steering are entirely different things, a car can grip well and yet handle poorly (Audi), similarly, having your spine smashed through your skull over the bumps or over-sharp steering isn't “handling” either. A Jag handles beautifully and yet is supple over the bumps. A Rover 75 handles beautifully and yet is supple over the bumps. The Germans just don't get it – lap times are easy to time and require no thought, your article writes itself. Unfortunately, after sampling the latest Jags even they heading down the “sporty” ride route to keep the adolescent Journos happy. RIP Jaguar. Yes the Journalists are to blame, but then so are the buying public for buying into it.
I remember reading an Autocar article on the Jag XJR vs Sporty Merc and M-Beemer, the Jag was given a hard time for lack of sporting credentials (wasn't stiff enough), then the weather changed and Germans just couldn't keep up, the Jag still came last in the test, it's not as if we get damp bumpy roads in the UK...
At least motorcyclists are more clued up, they are buying Triumphs by the bucketload over stiffly-sprung Jap sportsbikes. Triumph engineers know how to make suspension work on damp bumpy crumby British roads and do not pander to the magazine lap-time jockeys.
|