Michelin Energy Saver opinions - craneboy

Hi there

I'm currently looking to replace all four corners on my 1.4 Citroen Berlingo in the next couple of days. As like most people these days,I am feeling the pinch and have been trying out various "maximiling" techniques to try and squeeze every drop out of my ever contracting fuel tank! So I was wondering about the claims Michelin are making for this tyre. They sound impressive but they are pretty darned expensive in comparison with my usual mid-range choice's (Firestone/Uniroyal/Avon) I also read somewhere that grip and handling can be somewhat compromised with energy saving tyres, however my driving style and vehicle choice certainly do not push tyres to their limits. So my question is... are they really worth the initial outlay, or just a clever piece of marketing?

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - primeradriver

I found their wet grip to be fairly poor, and German tyre tests say the same.

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - mlj

I have a Berlingo. Vredesteins for me. Better tyres, and cheaper, than Michelin. How you drive will affect fuel consumption rather than choice of rubber, in my opinion.

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - TeeCee

Another thing to consider in addition to the price, handing and grip is the road noise. These things are as noisy as all heck, especially at high speed.

My company car (Prius) came on these as standard. First time I've ever had a fleet car where the winter boots are significantly quieter than the summer ones. Everyone who's been in it has commented on the road noise. I am firmly convinced that the alleged slight fuel savings are not worth the awful racket.

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - turbo11

If you don't want to spend a lot, then if they are available in your tyre size then I would recommend Uniroyal RainExpert tyres. Fitted them to my wifes Mazda 3.( Event tyres-mobile fitters, very good. HJ recommends them) Quiet, drive nicely, very good in the wet, and were excellent in the snow. We live in a rural area on un-gritted and ploughed roads. Not once did she get stuck. Twice I had to leave my car at home and use hers to get to work. If they were available in my car tyre size (they're not) I would fit them without hesitation.

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - Slightlyfatdirector

I have no links whatsoever to Michelin, but went to Michelin Primacy HP's on my last car, a Volvo S60. They might be different to the Energy Savers, but I thought I would throw my two'penoth in.

The Michelin's replaced Pirelli P6000's which would be worn to the limit at 10,000 miles on the front. When I went to Michelin it went up to 30,000 miles which was a staggering improvement. As grippy too, which for me is critical. It made the small increase in cost pay for itself many many times over.

I see another person says they are noisy, but maybe these are different to the Primacy HP tyres. I found a significant improvement noise-wise, with road-roar significantly reduced.

Have just changed from Goodyears on the BMW 5 series Touring I have to Michelin HP Primacys and they have also reduced road noise and significantly improved the ride (despite being run-flats). The Goodyears lasted a massive distance (over 60,000 miles if I remeber correctly) so it will be interesting to see how they compare in time.

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - primeradriver

Different story altogether SFD. You've gone from a tyre that is known to be pretty poor (the P6000, regarded by many as a "ditchfinder"), which was well-worn (stopping distances in the wet are significantly longer with 1.6mm tyres than ones with 3mm or more), to a good tyre with full tread. Of course there is going to be an improvement.

I have P6000s on one of my cars and they're not a good tyre -- the Admirals that make up the other pair on the same car are far better, and cost half as much.

Michelins generally are good tyres, but I found the Energy Saver to be no better than a budget tyre for grip -- and I didn't see any improvement in MPG either. They last well, but then so does a Nankang NS2 at half the price).

The recommendation of the Uniroyal RainExpert is a good one.

Edited by primeradriver on 31/03/2011 at 15:15

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - madf

I bought Michelin Energy last year for my Yaris: 175/65/R14.

Grip: v good.. even in snow an dice: never any problems.

Averaging 70mpg on long runs - (2003 D4D)

Noisy? Not very...

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - craneboy

Many thanks for the replies folks, much appreciated. I have ordered a set of the Uniroyal rain expert, as they are available in my size, and they inspire me with confidence safetywise. will let you know how I get on with them...cheers

CB

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - Dingle232

Am thinking about buying a set of Uniroyal Rain Experts as, like you, I am a long time Michelin buyer but am not sure whether the name warrants the premium these days. The Uniroyals have been recommended to me but I wondered how you found them to be grip/wear/noise wise?

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - OssettTyreHouse

The Michelin Energy Saving tyres are a does exactly what it says on the tin tyre and do work (or they would be getting fined left right and centre), there are different reports of some people getting road noise and other people not getting road noise.

I have a Ford Fiesta Zetec s on 195/45r16 and ive just switched from continental contact sport 2 on the rear and contact 3 on the front after poor wear. I have switched to the Pirelli P Zero Nero and are a fantastic tyre, brilliant grip and no road noise for me what so ever. one thing that I also noticed is ive had the tyres on now for a good 5 months and have 6mm left on the front and 8mm on the back and im not one for cornering slow or driving slow I will admit

Vredesteins are an up and coming brand provnig to have brilliant performance in all weather conditions and we are finding them to become very popular amongst our customers. They are a lot cheaper then Michelin as well in pretty much every size

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - Collos25

Vredesteins are an up and coming brand provnig to have brilliant performance in all weather conditions and we are finding them to become very popular amongst our customers. They are a lot cheaper then Michelin as well in pretty much every size

I am 64 and you could buy them when I was a lad.

I have been running some cheap "Runway" tyres on my CLC they are excellent as far as wear goes but the road noise is something else so I have put some Dunlop winter tyres on a few weeks early and they are totaly noiseless,they are now compulsory here in Germany.

Edited by Collos25 on 01/09/2011 at 15:46

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - wrangler_rover

I have a Toyota Avensis 2 litre diesel tourer.

The original front tyres factory fit Bridgestones lasted 37,500 miles.

They were replaced by Michelin Energys which lasted 55,500 miles. I noticed no appreciable difference in handling, noise etc but I don't drive with a heavy right foot on the accelerator or brakes as averaging 56 mpg proves

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - oldtoffee

The latest Energy Savers seem to have sorted out the compromise between low rolling resistance and comfort/performance. I had them on my previous Passat and they replaced part worn Dunlop Sports which gave me one very scary moment in the wet. Michelins were much much better in every single way, quieter, more comfortable (M4 west between J5 and J6 and speed humps as the tests?) better wet and dry grip. Only had them on for 10,000 miles before I sold the car but they hadn't worn more than 1 or 1.5mm if that. Can't say they were notably more fuel efficient than the Dunlops as I never kept the Dunlops long enough to measure. I bought the Michelins assuming from test data that they'd be mpg efficient, wear well and offer good wet and dry performance. 25% off for 4 at ATS made them competitive with mid market offerings.

I've had Vredesteins summer and all seasons in the past and the only negative over the Michelins would be noise and comfort.

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - jc2

Echo the P Zero Nero-outstanding handling and grip but they're not wearing out!

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - OssettTyreHouse

Why would you want them to wear out? Id want them to last forever if i could.

With regards to vredestein I know they've been around years but what I mean is they are becoming more and more popular and making a bigger name for themselves and pushing on their promotions more than they used to

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - GeoffC

I have read LOADs of peoples opinions and tests on Tyres generally and it would seem to sum up that the Michelin Energy Saver is a nice driving comfortable tyre which has good grip in the dry. It is not bad in the wet but there are others noticably better, and for less money. So grip inthe dry, comfortable and nice to drive are the plus points.

The Uniroyals mentioned earlier are on my shortlist to try as they seem to be a sensible tyre. Also in the same bracket I have tried the Continental Premium Contact 2's and have been really pleased with them - only problem with those is they are not good in the snow where others I have tried have been better.

Will be interested to see if anyone posts 1st hand experience of the Rain Experts - my only resevations might be - they keep saying they are best for small to medium cars - I guess my old Scenic just about fits that catagory as the old Scenic was the same sort of dimensions as an old mk3 Astra

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - ChannelZ
Will be interested to see if anyone posts 1st hand experience of the Rain Experts - my only resevations might be - they keep saying they are best for small to medium cars - I guess my old Scenic just about fits that catagory as the old Scenic was the same sort of dimensions as an old mk3 Astra

I have the RainExpert on the front of my petrol Mondeo. It's a reasonably light car at around 1300kg, similar to an i30 amazingly.

They grip well, clear water well, but they're not the best handling tyre. You really need lots of steering input to get them to work. This leads to shoulder wear. They are quiet and comfortable. It looks like they'll be down to 3mm tread in around 12,000 miles on the front, which isn't good. Previous tyres, Bridgestone Turanza ER300 did 20,000 on the front.

As I said in another thread, I doubt I'll get them again, I'll likely go for another pair of Hankooks, as that's what I have on the rear of the Mondeo.

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - Steveieb

Our local taxi operators are specifying Hankooks and they drive mostly Mercedes. They point out that MB are fitting Hanlooks as standard .

I have fitted Hankook Eco's and they have improved the ride on my A4. And for £70 a tyre on a 205/55/16 they are amazing value for money.

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - daveyjp

I had no hesitation having the OEM Michelins on my B class replaced with the same. £80 a corner for Mercedes fitment 205-55-16 - 30,000 or so from the fronts last time round.

They are far better than the OEM Pirellis fitted to my wife's A class.

Michelin Energy Saver opinions - Wackyracer

I replaced my OE fitment Michelin Energy's with Continental Eco tyres. They feel smoother and are noticeably quieter.

I had Pirellis on my Toyota and I changed them for Nexen's which I was pleased with, Handling, Dry and wet weather were all good in my opinion.